Quote:
Originally Posted by Kiimosabi
Are you talking about taking this guy in the 1st? Because I don't think so.
|
He's better than Diggs, Johnson, and...Fulton.
Where is the value if that's the case?
And Fulton was one of the few CB's that I entertained taking in our spot before.
Arnette is better.
And these same NFL write ups are that you are referring to did such brilliant work as this:
Patrick Mahomes 5.87
WEAKNESSES Can be inconsistent in his approach. Needs to play inside the offense and show more discipline. Too eager to go big game hunting. Ravenous appetite for the explosive play can also bring unwanted trouble. Willingness to default to playground style appears to limit his ability to get into a consistent rhythm. Needs to improve anticipatory reads and learn to take what the defense gives him. Decision making can go from good to bad in a moment's notice. Operates from a narrow base and allows his upper body and arm to race ahead of his feet. Has a dip and wind-up in his standard release. Explosive delivery and follow-through causes some throws to sail. Needs better touch on intermediate and deep balls. Carries ball a little low in the pocket. Impatient. Will leave pocket prematurely rather than standing in and winning in rhythm. Better as a scrambler than pure runner. Looked a little less mobile in the open field this season.
DRAFT PROJECTION Round 1-2
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2017/profil...mes?id=2558125
Might as well call these NFL profiles on NFL.com NFL astrology!
They gave Nathan Peterman in the same draft a similar grade to a generational QB. A guy that was so bad at Tennessee he got apples thrown at him and chased out of the conference.