Quote:
Originally Posted by TomahawkChump
"pick apart" might be the most laughable thing I've read on this site. You just compared single players on Seahawks and Chiefs and used that as empirical proof that the Seahawks haven't been a "dominant" team. First, I'd argue maybe we have different standards for dominant. I believe that going 11-5 (49ers, Saints, Ravens, Rams, Cardinals were the losses) with the hardest SOS showed they were one of the best teams in the NFL this year. I hate the Seahawks, but I'm also not ignorant to the fact that had they not had a run of injuries late in the season they would've been a tough out for anyone in the playoffs. Keep dancing, monkey.
|
Scored fewer points. Gave up more points. Less efficient on offense. More porous on defense. You want 'empirical proof' feel free to Google it.
Ultimately the Chiefs scored 46 more points than the Seahawks and surrendered
90 fewer than that quaint little facsimile out west. But hey, what's a 136 point swing in scoring differential among friends? We'll just explain away more than a touchdown difference per game by saying SoS and ignoring contextualized stats like DVOA, etc that ALSO show the Chiefs being a superior squad in every single way even when accounting for schedule strength.
I mean I thought I was being generous by giving them the positional breakdowns because it at least allowed me to kick LBer their way.