Quote:
Originally Posted by Hern
Whattttt????? What fan from any team would ever make that claim???
|
Well, let's see . . . we've heard that D. Watson is a superior QB to Mahomes, is more athletic (I'll give them that), is faster (ditto), has a better arm (no way in hell), tougher (no idea where that comes from), and is mentally stronger (don't think so).
Then we heard that Tannehill was statistically a far better QB over the last 8 weeks or so, was more accurate, faster and tougher, and some other nonsense.
So I figured that the Niners trolls would follow suit.
Also, earlier in the year I visited a Niners site and read that Pat was just a system QB, that he was just lucky and would soon fall back to Earth and be no better than Derek Carr or someone, that Pat wasn't capable of leading his team back from adversity, that without Kelce and Hill, Pat would be no better than average, etc., and so on.
I don't really care; I've watched every game Pat has played about 4 times each, used the coaches film POV on GamePass, and I've been analyzing QBs for almost 30 years. As an amateur of course. But I've never seen anything like him. So IMO, Pat's the best I've ever seen. And the guy I had in first place before Pat was Joe Montana.
But I'm sure that before the SB gets started, some Niners trolls will be on here regurgitating some of those exact sentiments. Which is great.