Quote:
Originally Posted by Callidus
I am not saying tanny is a game breaker but he is alex with a big arm at worst. And charles was a great all around back but he is not even near as scary as Henry. Henry might not be the all around back but he decimates and demoralized teams for half the year. Charles got it done no doubt. But no1 thought he would single handedly beat them.
Side note: sorry about the mass of posts in a row by me. Was just catching up to the stuff since I went to work. Don't know you forums stance on this. In the future I will put multiple quotes and responses in one comment ifnthat is how you prefer it. Just let me know.
|
Is Henry more physically imposing? Sure.
Charles was a terrifying back to face, though. Track speed with great patience and the ability to take any touch the distance. Huge playmaker/gamebreaker.
He single-handedly beat a lot of teams over the prime of his career, including that 2013 season.
Tannehill has more arm than Smith. Won't argue that. But the way they play and are set up by the things around them and can make some plays with their feet is similar.
Hope for your sake your team is smarter about what it pays a QB of that general type than the Chiefs were.