Quote:
Originally Posted by Megatron96
No. That turns out not to be the case.
The BAL offense is predicated heavily on establishing the run; everything they do depends on running the ball on early downs and getting to 3rd and short. From there they execute their passing game. Not the other way around. 3rd and long for the Ravens is worse than flipping a coin.
It was the same exact problem for the Vikings as well this weekend. Everything in that offense is dependent on Dalvin Cook running the ball and getting to 3rd and short. When they faced 3rd and long consistently, they couldn't execute their passing attack at all.
The Chiefs offense isn't dependent on a strong running game. Pat doesn't need 3rd and short to execute at a high percentage of efficiency. As a matter of fact, if you check those advanced stats everyone likes so much, you'll find that Mahomes converts 3rd and long more efficiently than he does 3rd and short. By a significant margin.
In fact, I'd have to check to be sure, but I don't think the Chiefs ran the ball more than 6 times during that 7 TD stretch. We ran RPOs and play-action, but they were almost all passing plays.
And the Titans passing defense is ranked in the bottom third of the league.
Just like the Texans passing defense.
Holy crap, did anyone else notice that the Chiefs actually ended up running for more yards than the Texans offense? Wild . . .
|
You could be right. Admittedly, I was just going by stats and Ravens have just been insanely good. As we've seen stats don't always matter even if Ravens had more yards and points than Chiefs. It didn't matter at all in the Titans game. Anything can happen, Chiefs go down 24 and then score 28 in a quarter. Sports are crazy. Hope the refs let them play.