Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Meck
because they were short on offensive talent.
The argument has always been: Is it Brady, or is it Belichick?
I think they both want to prove they each were the reason for the 6 rings and 9 appreances in the 'bowl.
if Brady goes elsewhere and wins it, and I think HE thinks he can, then his ego will be assuaged.
Personally, I think it was both, and Belichick could win with another QB, but that team is not ready to seriously compete offensive talent-wise.
Brady would need a supporting cast at this point, and a good offensive mind running things. Like a Reid, a Payton, someone like that.
|
Sorry, but no, Brady was NOT short on offensive talent. It was basically the same ****ing team he had last year. Same RBs. Same WRs. Same offensive coaching staff. His LT was injured last year? So was the LT this year.
One thing changed. Gimped Gronk retired. One ****ing slow ass TE was all the difference for a 41 year old QB vs the 42-year old abortion we saw this year?
Scratch that. One more thing changed. Brady changed. He advanced another year in his 40s in the NFL. He was a huge part of the offensive decline for the Patriots.