Quote:
Originally Posted by BigRedChief
There are not two sides in this situation. People must be convicted based upon " beyond a reasonable doubt".
The DNA collected at the scene shows conclusively that it was not the Central Park 5's sperm, skin under her fingernails, hairs found at the scene. Later another well known rapist admits to the crime. And guess what, his DNA matches exactly to the crime. He admits the crime. No matter how you slice this new confession and DNA match, that's some serious, no way around it "reasonable doubt". Case over. release them.
|
So your position is that this DNA evidence establishes that this woman was in fact simply raped by a lone individual?