Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate
You're both missing the point entirely but I'm not going to debate it. You've already pre-conditioned your minds to accept this cluster****.
|
wha?
No.
Nobody's missing your point.
You say:
Peters=bust, bad pick
Hunt=bust, bad pick
Hill=bust, bad pick.
Your words.
We say:
Peters-not ideal, worth the risk, 3 years of good play nets a #2 and a #4 in trade.
Hunt-two seasons of all-pro level play for a mid round pick.
Hill-three seasons of amazing, game changing play for a 5th round pick.
While we'd love it if we got 5 plus years from all those guys, you can't be mad because it didn't last longer. They were all HIGH performance per investment.
And we don't know what's going on with Hill. It's just as likely that he'll be cleared as found guilty.
I say you're reacting on an emotional level and not thinking logically.