Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
Yea i agree, but I honestly don’t think that’s it with Dan specifically as he’s one
of the guys that will tell you Lebron is better than MJ or at least entertain it.
He’s just one of those that is just now realizing that young QB’s having early success can be misleading in terms of their future. I used to make that same argument with guys like Kap, Dak, Carr, Watson, RG3, etc.
I see a lot of people are just now starting to realize it, and they’re applying it to Mahomes who is nothing like those other guys.
Just like I could see Wentz wasn’t one of those dudes last year, you can see it with Mahomes now. Some people don’t know a special QB when they see on.
|
Which is fine. If he keeps performing at a high level over a long time, they will give up on the “fluke” idea. Then it will be scrutiny on whether he wins enough (Rodgers/Marino/Peyton). I feel like he’s stuck in similar situation to college. Very questionable defense backing him up. Montana and Brady would not have 4+ rings if they had the Chiefs current defense.