Thread: Chiefs Boy it really feels like they're gearing up for a SB run this year.
View Single Post
Old 09-01-2017, 12:52 PM   #13
mdchiefsfan mdchiefsfan is offline
Supporter
 
mdchiefsfan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2009
Casino cash: $783904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower View Post
You have a point with the Ravens, but not with the other three. The Pats have Brady; it doesn't seem to matter what slapdick they trot out as a WR. The Broncos had Thomas and Sanders which still made a punchless Manning effective, the Hawks had one SB appearance with Golden Tate and Doug Baldwin and had the other with Baldwin and Kearse.

Conley and Hill aren't on the level of four of the five receivers mentioned above. Hill has a decent likelihood of proving better than Kearse in the short term (this season and the next; Kearse became a 500 yard type of guy in his third season) and the others in the longer run.

Conley might look like a bonafide #2 receiver that starts on a dozen or more other teams, but I think it's homerism to immediately assume this is the case.
So, with two viable receiving threats? Isn't that what your bagging on the Chiefs for?
__________________
2017 Adopt-A-Chief:TYREEK HILL
Posts: 10,793
mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.mdchiefsfan is obviously part of the inner Circle.
     Reply With Quote