Quote:
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe
The Broncos QB situation is nowhere near as bad as the Jets, Rams, Browns, Texans, Dolphins, Bills, Jags, Bears, Cardinals, 49ers, and Chiefs'. |
I'll give you the Jets. The Rams have Goff, last years 1st overall pick. He is unproven, but I would put them at least equal with the Donks until Goff shows if he was worthy of his draft staus or not. Browns just drafted Kizer in the first, so I will also put them equal with the Donks until Kizer proves otherwise. The Bills have Tyrod Taylor. He's no superstar, but is he worse than Pixton and Semen? No. The Texans just drafted Watson. See Rams and Browns. Jags. Seriously? Are you really going to tell me that Pixton and Semen are better than Bortles and Henne? Even ElFraud would trade his quarterbacks for either of them. Again, no superstars. But they are better than Denver's signal callers. Bears just drafted Tribusky and have him grooming behind Glennon. Definitely not worse off than the Donks. Probably just a little better. Cardinals need a better quarterback. But Palmer has had some pretty good seasons, including in Arizona. He is at least as good as Semen and Pixton. I'll give you the 49ers too. But the Chiefs?
. Now you're just trolling. Alex Smith has owned the Donks and the AFC West. He sucks, but he's better than Semen. And Pixton is looking like a bust, while Mahomes is looking like he's going to be a star. At Worst, Chiefs are equal because Semen looked just like Smith last season and Mahomes is unproven. But in now way shape or form is their quarterback situation worse than the Donks.
So, out of the teams you listed, I see 2 dumpster fire teams that you can tout that are worse off than the Donks. But the rest are equal or better to anyone not wearing orange colored homer blinders.
edit: I left off the Fins. Nice to pick a team whose starter just went down. Their future is still brighter than the Donks. And Cutler, as bad as he is, is still better than Semen and Pixton.