Quote:
Originally Posted by RunKC
This is Clark's fault 100%. This isn't a CEO's type of responsibility. This is management of any level, period.
Surely Clark had done yearly reviews and knew something deeper?
What you described is a completely incompetent CEO. There is no way this should have happened at all. If Clark saw problems, he should have done his due dilligence and found out the source of the problem.
If it was Dorsey, then he should have been fired after the playoff game and Ballard should have been promoted.
|
If Clark knew that Dorsey could be a problem without Ballard.....then you deny Indy the ability to interview Ballard and keep him for when you dump Dorsey. Clark knows that there is a year on Dorsey's contract left....and he doesn't want him around without his balance (Ballard). Eventually Clark would have to decide between the two.