|
Why are people saying Dorsey was bad with contracts? It seems like revisionist history. I didnt like Houston's and Berry's contracts but in Houston's case, the guy had just had a 22 sack season. The only option that could have been better than what Dorsey did would have been to tag Houston as his value could only go down IMO after that monster season and then give him his contract the following year. In Berry's case, I think we gave him too much but again it seems like Dorsey was absolutely standing his ground but at the end of the day Berry just had had a great season and he wouldn't budge. Maclin's contract was not bad though a bit risky because of his injury concerns. When we signed him, I can't remember any fan being disappointed with that contract as the Chiefs were severely lacking talent at WR and the contract seemed on par with what was given around the league at that moment.
Anyways Dorsey was a great talent evaluator and that trumps all.
I thought with Dorsey we were to be a perennial winner like the Steelers, Packers and Ravens.
|