Thread: Chiefs Dorsey gone?
View Single Post
Old 06-23-2017, 11:13 AM   #1183
ChiefAshhole1056 ChiefAshhole1056 is offline
Veteran
 

Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Casino cash: $6241100
I think this comes down to this team wont be manageable going forward unless we bring in a guy capable of managing cap space appropriately. Its bizarre to think about but this roster has become so talented that scouting and talent acquisition takes a backseat to cap manipulation now, and Dorsey just simply is not the guy for that.

Think of alllllll the young talent we have that are players you are going to want to keep long-term throughout this roster currently, I dont think Clark believes Dorsey is capable of handling that properly. What contracts do you really think he would end up giving Peters, a top flight CB? Dee Ford, a promising pass rusher at a position that is simply not cheap. Chris Jones, a blooming DL with an immense ceiling. Tyreek could be expensive if he turns into a true WR. Thats just the names we know of now, what happens when we have another year of Dorsey finds that could progress into notable talents (Mitchell, Hunt, Conley, Murray possibly)?

I'm not saying this is THE reason, but I think its one of a few that made Clark weary. Along with the possible GB departure, maybe the locker room relationship with the front office after how the whole Maclin thing worked out, and probably the fact that Dorsey got rid of the teams WR1 and has yet to do anything with the space and the team is like "wtf why get rid of him for nothing?". Not to mention I'm sure Hunt has started to get tired of exiting players that he's probably grown quite fond of like JC and Maclin having disparaging words about the franchise on their way out.

Idk, this is by far one of the most bizarre and shocking developments of my time as a chiefs fan and i'm just grasping at some explanations here but so far those has given me the most solace. Take it for what you will, but I definitely think there's some elements of these things that are contributors and until we get some true clarity on the situation I'm going to go with these.
Posts: 1,176
ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.ChiefAshhole1056 must have mowed badgirl's lawn.
    Reply With Quote