06-23-2017, 06:07 AM
|
#1006
|
Diablo Negro
Join Date: Sep 2003
Casino cash: $-297338
|
Stop all the nonsense about Reid taking over football operations and player personnel etc...
Quote:
Reid, who was in charge of personnel toward the end in Philadelphia, will not do the same here.
▪ Reid was told about Dorsey, but not asked to approve or give input on the decision.
▪ The Chiefs’ structure of the coach, general manager, and team president reporting equally to Hunt will not change. Hunt will conduct the interviews and hire Dorsey’s replacement.
That’s what I know to be true. Additionally, here is what I believe to be true:
▪ Reid did not force Dorsey out, but Hunt didn’t come up with this idea by himself. He is far more in touch with the Chiefs day-to-day than many think, and would not have done this if he thought Reid or others in football operations would have a major problem. He must’ve heard or seen issues with how Dorsey did his job.
▪ This was not a reaction to the amateurish way that wide receiver Jeremy Maclin’s release was handled, the player saying he learned from a voicemail, and was never asked to take a pay cut. Hunt is not a reactionary, and besides, we haven’t heard Dorsey’s side of what happened.
▪ Hunt decided his team transitioning from abject embarrassment in 2012 immediately into its most successful run in two decades was done because of the coaching and perhaps even in spite of the personnel and salary cap management.
And, now, one thing I suspect could be true:
▪ Perhaps this all broke down around negotiations for a contract extension. Hunt had been consistent — even after the end of the 2016 season — that he expected a long-term deal for Dorsey, whose contract was to expire after the 2017 season. Dorsey could have asked for too much, whether in money or years or an out to take the job in Green Bay if it opened.
I want to be as clear as possible: I don’t know that to be true. But it is my working theory.
|
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...157737484.html
|
Posts: 74,271
|
|