Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut
You're totally clueless. There is no precedent like we are witnessing. You are making up a rationale for the trade up that is NOT concordant with Dorsey/Reid's interviews. They know Smith will AT LEAST be around for the next year with no guarantee for the following year if he were to have a serious injury. So what better opportunity then to draft a raw kid who has the ability to learn from a 12 year veteran. How many 12 year veteran QBs are in the league right now with the winning record like Smith's this side of the decade?
Common sense.
|
All I can do is laugh.
How about the precedent when Andy said he ideally would like a rookie QB to develop for one year? -->
http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2017/5...-a-year-to-sit
It's sad. You're clinging to this average ass QB who they so clearly want to replace with a more talented player. Does he need his one year to develop? Sure, but it's go time in 2018 for the Chiefs. Andy Reid and John Dorsey don't have forever left on their careers. They are pushing their chips in on PM2, just as they did on Draft night.