Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
I've talked myself into it.
If it were the 1st and a comp 3rd, it's a no-brainer. Throwing in the 2nd next year stings a bit but it puts us so far ahead of where we'd be if we waited until next season (or took the next best option) that it's worth the capital.
Meanwhile, we still hold onto our 2nd this year to find the ILB we need and our original 3rd to get depth on the DL or edge. I don't see a lot of pass-catching talent out wide in the middle rounds but there are some intriguing TE options that we could target in the 3rd or 4th as well if we went that route.
We don't feel the real sting in that trade until 2018 but if it gets us to our QB a year earlier, you do it and you don't think twice. If Ballard offered that deal to move up to 14, I'd probably take it.
I'd regret it because ultimately I think the Cardinals stuff is a smokescreen and it's unlikely that anyone actually takes Mahomes before 22, but **** me I'd hate to be wrong. I really like that guy.
|
Your last paragraph sums it up for me, and this is my conundrum. For me personally it is either Mahomes or Watson for KC as qbotf. I liked Kizer, but the recent reports of his immaturity have scared me off.
I know I proposed the move up to get to Indy's pick for Mahomes. This was before the scenario was proposed about Foster still being on the board. If Foster is still on the board at that point however, do you take pause and re-evaluate? It is not often you have top five talent available to you in the mid to late teens at a position of need that you can manoeuvre for given our draft position.