Quote:
Originally Posted by New World Order
Meh, Assweiler played well too with Denver. I think Semen and Assweiler are one in the same.
Doesn't really matter to me if Denver starts Semen or Lynch. I just don't want them to get Romo.
|
Siemian is way more accurate than Brent and can throw a better deep ball.
The problem is the OL was historically bad and there was no run game after CJ and then Bibbs went down. Booker was a project pick in the 4th only meant to spell CJ not take the load and he was even bad as a backup.
Siemian is smart, can make the play calls, can read the D and can make all the throws. Did he check down a lot because teams took DT and or Sanders away because there was no TE threat? Sure but when he did have time to make a big throw it was placed where the receiver had a chance to run after the catch. The bomb he threw in the Bengals game was a thing of beauty and then he had that great touch pass to Fowler against you guys that should have won the game.
I think Lynch is the Brent clone and he is a couple years away, that was a need pick, not BPA so John will force them to get him to improve but they have 2 QB's because John believes in drafting and developing QB's every year.
I keep hearing rumors that John prefers Lynch and doesn't like Siemian but Siemian was clearly the better QB last year. Lynch got worse as the year went on.
With CJ back, a drafted RB to compete with Booker, a TE upgrade (either FA or Draft), improving WR depth after DT and Sanders, and of course multiple OL upgrades Siemian should pay big dividends for us under McCoy's scheme and in his 2nd year of starting.
You guys get to trot out alex again and the same old scared Line of Scrimmage O that Andy has coached for the last 5 years while your D atrophies into averageness.