Quote:
Originally Posted by Baby Lee
Yes, it was ambiguous and dismissive. So I asked you to clarify, not because I didn't know that there was a difference between a 72 and 75 body style. I posted the damn differences in body styles. I asked you to clarify because no rational person would think that the body style changes from 72-75 were the point of mac and my exchange.
You've conceded you misread the matter, what is so hard about saying 'sorry for interrupting the conversation, . . . I'll be on my way?'
What in you drives this need to be 'right' about something that didn't even involve you at the time, then you interjected to provide unneeded 'knowledge' you later concede was superfluous.
Oh well, the entire conversation is shot to hell anyway.
in the interest of board comity
Thank you Sauto for noticing the differences between my grandfather's truck and mac's grandfathers. Those of us less versed in the automotive arts tend to miss those kind of subtle sledgehammers of visual information. I apologize to mac if I in any way insinuated that the truck I was not offering to sell was in any way similar to his grandfather's, which clearly has body differences. I should probably know to keep my sentimental trap shut when menfolk are talking, and with that I apologize once more all around and take my leave.
|
saying a truck has a different body style isnt in ANY ambiguous. not in ANY ****ING WAY. it HAS a different body style because they CHANGED IT IN 1973.
you are a crazy, whiny, ****ing ****.