Quote:
Originally Posted by BigChiefTablet
No it was a direct ****ing comparison. If you want to dismiss the argument that the Rams and Jeff Fischer made a decent QB look bad, you have to dismiss that a bad 49ers team and multiple offensive coordinators made Alex Smith look bad. So that must mean that Alex Smith sucks. Or, maybe he doesn't suck, but then neither does Foles.
You are the one applying one set of rules to Alex Smith criticism and another to Foles. Both looked bad on bad teams with the wrong coach. Foles did manage to slip in a record breaking season, however. And he looks to be doing pretty good now that he's back in a system that is better for him with a coach that is better for him.
|
Okay, I see your misunderstanding.
example A
" Nick Foles sucked then because of HC, etc etc etc. "
" Alex Smith sucked then because of HC, etc etc etc. "
These two sentences.. to me.. are NOT.. excuses.
example B
" Alex Smith sucked then because of HC, etc etc etc. "
" Nick Foles sucked then because of HC, etc etc etc. "
Accepting one of these sentences as an excuse.. but not the other..
is what many other people do here. That is hypocritical, and fails.