Quote:
Originally Posted by SNR
I think what you put up when you're with a team is a far more accurate measure of what you're worth as a WR to that team. In this case, those players went to Tampa at the end of their careers and put up numbers with the team good enough to rank in their top 10.
As far as I'm concerned, it doesn't matter if you're Albert Wilson or the Queen of England. If you're a good WR when you're on the team, it will show. If you're not, then welp. And if you're not there long enough to make a very big dent, then how valuable were you to that franchise?
That last question isn't rhetorical, by the way. I'm genuinely asking. What are measures that can set you apart from other players?
|
I'm big on single-season stats as opposed to career stats. I'd rather have a guy who's dominant for three seasons than a guy who's above average for eight. So maybe if you looked at "best season in a team's uniform", that could provide some input. Pro bowls as well.
It's possible that a team could string together a bunch of guys who have three or four good seasons and then let them go, and as a result none of them will have stellar career stats. It's not a likely scenario, but it's possible.
That said, I don't think the Buccaneer or the Chiefs fall into that category.