Quote:
Originally Posted by mcaj22
but you can say the same about the two turds the Cavs are offering hence why they havent taken that deal either.
If there was such a big gap between both deals like youve been claiming from the Cavs end, then why hasnt Minnesota taken it yet. Its clear they think both deals are shit and there isnt much of a difference. Because if there was, like you claim, then they should just do it. But its funny youre saying the front office blew it on Garnett then want them to take Waiters and Bennett. Wouldnt that just be Minnesota blowing it again? Many would say, yes.
|
I never said either was a good deal for Minnesota. I think Minnesota probably blew a lot of opportunities to trade Love a month ago, which is why they're in the position they're in right now. If these are the two best deals they're going to get, I think the Cleveland offer is clearly better. If they're going to play hardball, they had better be really careful to avoid the trade offer going even lower.