ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Sam Darnold to Seattle (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=357440)

FloridaMan88 03-10-2025 12:34 PM

Sam Darnold to Seattle
 
Just heard on NFL Radio.

Three years, $110.5 million, $55 million guaranteed.

FloridaMan88 03-10-2025 12:42 PM

Schefter just updated the total amount of the contract… $100.5 million.

scho63 03-10-2025 12:44 PM

That is a little bit of a surprise

Titty Meat 03-10-2025 12:48 PM

Sam Cassel dude is cheeks

TLO 03-10-2025 01:12 PM

LMAO

RedinTexas 03-10-2025 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FloridaMan88 (Post 17994707)
Schefter just updated the total amount of the contract… $100.5 million.

Pretty nice for a guy that was considered a total bust in his first contract.

notorious 03-10-2025 01:14 PM

If he's a bridge while they develop someone it's ok. If they think he's the answer than ROFL.

chiefzilla1501 03-10-2025 01:14 PM

I actually think this is strangely a decent move. Turn darnold into a pure game manager and lean heavily into running behind walker/charbonnet. It’s better than last year where they were way too aggressive passing behind a mid qb. Seattle not competing for anything but it seems a better fit for their team than geno

BWillie 03-10-2025 01:17 PM

This guy sucks.

New World Order 03-10-2025 01:26 PM

Hes going to return to his old form in Seattle

Deberg_1990 03-10-2025 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 17994768)
This guy sucks.

I hope he dies!!!!!

DJ's left nut 03-10-2025 01:32 PM

I don't think that's a bad deal.

I think Darnold has mid-tier ability and if he's protected he's capable of making a lot of throws that other QBs in that tier can't.

Seattle has a pretty strong OL.

If you aren't trying to make him throw it 40+ times/gm, you should be in nice shape. And it's a short term deal so you can still sniff around for a long-term option. Moreover, he's young enough that if he shows last year (in aggregate) was no fluke, he can be your long-term guy going forward.

Geno was trying to get a new deal. Given where Seattle is in the competitive cycle, I think they were better served dealing Geno and getting a guy with more ceiling in Darnold (who's also much younger) in Darnold while also getting a decent pick in return for Smith.

kcgreene 03-10-2025 01:34 PM

Honestly, this surprises me. The play for Seattle seemed obvious after trading Geno. Bridge Start Sam Howell, whom they traded for, while you draft and develop your guy this year.

scho63 03-10-2025 01:58 PM

What does Darnold give them that Geno didn't?

Their Oline was terrible for Geno and he is more mobile.

What am I missing? :hmmm:

TwistedChief 03-10-2025 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17994812)
What does Darnold give them that Geno didn't?

Their Oline was terrible for Geno and he is more mobile.

What am I missing? :hmmm:

Younger.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.