![]() |
Neil Smith and the 3-4 Defense?
Do I remember right that during Dan Saleamua's time in KC, we ran a 3-4 D with Sal as our NT?
If that's right, that would mean that Neil Smith was a dominant pass-rushing DE in the 3-4. Correct? I'm under the impression that the 3-4 DEs are not expected to generate big sack totals. If all that's right, what's the story with Neil's stats? |
Only from '88-'91. I don't know what his sack totals were those years. When Adolph came in '92, they signed Joe Phillips and switched to a 4-3.
|
Quote:
|
I didn't remember him as a 3-4, but could well be wrong. I just remember Saleaumua and Phillips at DT. Eh, what do I know?
|
|
Quote:
It raises the question why we were drafting a 3-4 DE at the top of the draft. I kept hearing how awful that decision is and it occured to me that we had to have done the exact same thing back in 88. |
Quote:
|
DT pretty much rushed every down giving us 4 guys with their hand in the dirt.
He was pretty much a DE during that time... |
Neil Smith wasn't a 5-technique defensive end. He wasn't asked to absorb blockers so that the linebackers could make plays. It's a completely different task.
Tyson Jackson doesn't even PLAY on third downs because pass rushing is his big liability. Smith was more of a 7-8 tech, rush defensive end in the mold of Bruce Smith, Mario Williams, Reggie White, etc. |
Quote:
|
Falcon!!!
|
Neil started in the 3-4 with Maas at NT. By the end the Chiefs were playing a 5-2 with DT outside only rushing the QB...giving Shannon Sharpe HOF numbers...The Chiefs used several MLB's and for many years Chris Martin was the all around OLB on the other side.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.