ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   News Passenger flight from Wichita collides with military helicopter in D.C. (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=356936)

DaFace 01-29-2025 10:26 PM

Passenger flight from Wichita collides with military helicopter in D.C.
 
Well, this is awful.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Reports: Inbound plane from Wichita collides with helicopter near Washington, D.C. airport<a href="https://t.co/4dpNJb8rqT">https://t.co/4dpNJb8rqT</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/kwch12?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#kwch12</a></p>— KWCH 12 News (@KWCH12) <a href="https://twitter.com/KWCH12/status/1884795268253581707?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Up to around 70 people were involved between the two aircraft.

New World Order 01-29-2025 10:29 PM

Damn

RollChiefsRoll 01-29-2025 10:35 PM

Horrible. Praying for those folks’ families…

Video of the crash on Twitter:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-media-max-width="560"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">RAW VIDEO OF THE DCA AIRPLANE CRASH<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/BREAKING?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#BREAKING</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/lookner?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@lookner</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/flightradar24?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@flightradar24</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/JordanHallWX?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@JordanHallWX</a> <br><br> <a href="https://t.co/gy3axktKAx">pic.twitter.com/gy3axktKAx</a></p>&mdash; Austin Ayers (@AustinAyersTV) <a href="https://twitter.com/AustinAyersTV/status/1884791190224073118?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Chiefslifer72 01-29-2025 10:39 PM

I live in Wichita and I am booked on that same flight in March. I dont know anyone with certainty that was on the flight but Wichita is a small
Place. Just tragic and hits a little too close to home.

scho63 01-29-2025 10:45 PM

I stuck the original in DC

https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=356935

Kiimo 01-29-2025 10:53 PM

I'm friends with several air traffic controllers at LAX and Van Nuys.


This? This doesn't happen in the US normally. It's almost always pilot error and in this case I'm thinking chopper pilot



Loss of separation alone gets people fired fast and that happens at 1000 feet

Why Not? 01-29-2025 11:04 PM

Awful. Not sure there’s a happy outcome for anyone involved.

RealSNR 01-29-2025 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17944707)


I’ll bet a lot of warm and sensitive things will be said over there

DaFace 01-29-2025 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 17944725)
Awful. Not sure there’s a happy outcome for anyone involved.

There was originally a report that some had been rescued from the water, but that appears to have been bullshit. Guessing there aren't going to be many happy stories out of this.

Ocotillo 01-29-2025 11:25 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is so sad.�� <br><br>Man waiting for his wife at Reagan National Airport, who was on board the commercial plane that crashed with Blackhawk, tells local news that she texted him shortly before the crash.<br><br>“I’m just praying that someone is pulling her out of the river right now.”�� <a href="https://t.co/yDamJCoPOd">pic.twitter.com/yDamJCoPOd</a></p>&mdash; Sean (@Xcellent78) <a href="https://twitter.com/Xcellent78/status/1884822295891370471?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

BigRedChief 01-29-2025 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimo (Post 17944717)
I'm friends with several air traffic controllers at LAX and Van Nuys.


This? This doesn't happen in the US normally. It's almost always pilot error and in this case I'm thinking chopper pilot



Loss of separation alone gets people fired fast and that happens at 1000 feet

I heard it was a training flight that wasn’t entered into the FAA ledger so the air traffic controllers were out of the loop.

We will all eventually get the truth of what happened.

DaFace 01-29-2025 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 17944740)
I heard it was a training flight that wasn’t entered into the FAA ledger so the air traffic controllers were out of the loop.

We will all eventually get the truth of what happened.

Reading through the ATC transcript, it's almost certainly the helicopter's fault. They said they had a visual on the regional jet and were told to maintain visual separation. Obviously, they didn't.

baitism 01-30-2025 02:04 AM

Terrorism

TambaBerry 01-30-2025 02:35 AM

Man I just heard that it had members of the US figure skating team on board and family. This is absolutely awful

Fishels 01-30-2025 02:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ocotillo (Post 17944736)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is so sad.�� <br><br>Man waiting for his wife at Reagan National Airport, who was on board the commercial plane that crashed with Blackhawk, tells local news that she texted him shortly before the crash.<br><br>“I’m just praying that someone is pulling her out of the river right now.”�� <a href="https://t.co/yDamJCoPOd">pic.twitter.com/yDamJCoPOd</a></p>&mdash; Sean (@Xcellent78) <a href="https://twitter.com/Xcellent78/status/1884822295891370471?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Man I hope she’s alive. That’s gotta be the worst feeling in the world

siberian khatru 01-30-2025 06:43 AM

No survivors.

27 bodies recovered from the plane so far, 1 from the helicopter

InChiefsHeaven 01-30-2025 06:55 AM

Lord have mercy. How does this happen? I mean, a Helicopter is MUCH more maneuverable than a commercial airliner...this had to be pilot error for the helicopter...

Just awful...

scho63 01-30-2025 07:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RealSNR (Post 17944726)
I’ll bet a lot of warm and sensitive things will be said over there

Wrong......:doh!:

scho63 01-30-2025 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spott (Post 17944788)
Does that airport get a lot of commercial traffic? I fly a lot and can’t say I’ve ever seen helicopters anywhere near the airports I fly out of.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why Not? (Post 17944790)
Yeah. It’s literally one of the busiest airports for commercial travel in the country if not world. And being DC and just the region anyway, there is tons of military traffic as well.

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17944810)
It's busy but it is all the helicopters that fly back and forth and up and down the Potomac night and day, both singular and in groups.

Busiest helicopter traffic I have ever seen. 3 major military bases they fly from: Andrews Joint Air Force, Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling and Ft Belvoir.

Ft Belvoir is the main helicopter training facility. Our first office in Springfield took me by there multiple times a week and I would see as many as 8 helicopters in the air at once in formation.

I also once saw 6 of them all practicing a ground hover at about 3 feet off the ground like they were standing still.

It is a very concentrated area.

I am shocked this hasn't occured before.

I have seen copters nearby takeoffs and landings all the time over my 10.years in the area.

I used to take a water taxi from Alexandria to Georgetown up the Potomac and it would pass Reagan Airport and it was always busy with all types of air traffic.

Spott 01-30-2025 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scho63 (Post 17944827)
I am shocked this hasn't occured before.

I have seen copters nearby takeoffs and landings all the time over my 10.years in the area.

I used to take a water taxi from Alexandria to Georgetown up the Potomac and it would pass Reagan Airport and it was always busy with all types of air traffic.

I used to see a lot of helicopter traffic when I lived in Jacksonville because of the 2 large navy bases there, but they were probably 20-30 miles from the commercial airport. Obviously DC is a different situation with everything that is there. With all that traffic there with different types of aircraft, it’s surprising that something like this hasn’t happened before.

dlphg9 01-30-2025 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ocotillo (Post 17944736)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is so sad.�� <br><br>Man waiting for his wife at Reagan National Airport, who was on board the commercial plane that crashed with Blackhawk, tells local news that she texted him shortly before the crash.<br><br>“I’m just praying that someone is pulling her out of the river right now.”�� <a href="https://t.co/yDamJCoPOd">pic.twitter.com/yDamJCoPOd</a></p>&mdash; Sean (@Xcellent78) <a href="https://twitter.com/Xcellent78/status/1884822295891370471?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

****ing Christ

IowaHawkeyeChief 01-30-2025 07:37 AM

Unfortunately, a lot of the US Skating Team and coaches and family were on the plane. Horrible.

TLO 01-30-2025 07:38 AM

Absolutely awful. :(

threebag 01-30-2025 08:28 AM

Photos show it came apart in mid-air. Prayers to those impacted by this tragedy.

seamonster 01-30-2025 08:30 AM

I work right across the river from Reagan National. The Coast Guard is running constant sorties out of National (Jayhawks), you've got blackhawks tooling up and down the river doing god knows what, you've got VIP's flying in State Department helicopters at all hours of the day...But the worst from my experience are these Blackhawks. It's like Vietnam over the Potomac sometimes.

siberian khatru 01-30-2025 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag (Post 17944880)
Photos show it came apart in mid-air.

Happens all the time! / Frankie

VAChief 01-30-2025 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seamonster (Post 17944881)
I work right across the river from Reagan National. The Coast Guard is running constant sorties out of National (Jayhawks), you've got blackhawks tooling up and down the river doing god knows what, you've got VIP's flying in State Department helicopters at all hours of the day...But the worst from my experience are these Blackhawks. It's like Vietnam over the Potomac sometimes.

I know it would be expensive, but maybe it's time to begin to shut down commercial flights into Reagan, transition to just government and military air space.

Dulles and Baltimore would need to be expanded, and maybe another airport in either Northern Virgina or Maryland. The metro now goes out directly to Dulles. It couldn't happen all at once, but that traffic around the Potomac is crazy and their is only ONE runway where heavies can land.

luv 01-30-2025 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ocotillo (Post 17944736)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is so sad.�� <br><br>Man waiting for his wife at Reagan National Airport, who was on board the commercial plane that crashed with Blackhawk, tells local news that she texted him shortly before the crash.<br><br>“I’m just praying that someone is pulling her out of the river right now.”�� <a href="https://t.co/yDamJCoPOd">pic.twitter.com/yDamJCoPOd</a></p>&mdash; Sean (@Xcellent78) <a href="https://twitter.com/Xcellent78/status/1884822295891370471?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

:deevee:

Dartgod 01-30-2025 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ocotillo (Post 17944736)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is so sad.�� <br><br>Man waiting for his wife at Reagan National Airport, who was on board the commercial plane that crashed with Blackhawk, tells local news that she texted him shortly before the crash.<br><br>“I’m just praying that someone is pulling her out of the river right now.”�� <a href="https://t.co/yDamJCoPOd">pic.twitter.com/yDamJCoPOd</a></p>&mdash; Sean (@Xcellent78) <a href="https://twitter.com/Xcellent78/status/1884822295891370471?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Why does our media think its a good idea to stuff a camera and microphone in front of a person experiencing the worst moment in their lives? Nobody needs to see that shit.

blake5676 01-30-2025 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ocotillo (Post 17944736)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">This is so sad.�� <br><br>Man waiting for his wife at Reagan National Airport, who was on board the commercial plane that crashed with Blackhawk, tells local news that she texted him shortly before the crash.<br><br>“I’m just praying that someone is pulling her out of the river right now.”�� <a href="https://t.co/yDamJCoPOd">pic.twitter.com/yDamJCoPOd</a></p>&mdash; Sean (@Xcellent78) <a href="https://twitter.com/Xcellent78/status/1884822295891370471?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 30, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Anyone else thinks it's incredibly tacky for the reporter to ask a terrified family member to see their phone to confirm the text message? What kind of normal person thinks thats a good idea.

This whole ordeal is just incredibly sad and scary. Plane travel is still easily the safest form of transport but when its been so long since we've had an incident in the US this is a sobering reminder that accidents happen.

RockChalk 01-30-2025 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAChief (Post 17944885)
I know it would be expensive, but maybe it's time to begin to shut down commercial flights into Reagan, transition to just government and military air space.

Dulles and Baltimore would need to be expanded, and maybe another airport in either Northern Virgina or Maryland. The metro now goes out directly to Dulles. It couldn't happen all at once, but that traffic around the Potomac is crazy and their is only ONE runway where heavies can land.

I've only flown into / out of Reagan once, all my other trips out there have been into Dulles / BWI, but I was astonished to see all of the non-commercial flying going on around it.

threebag 01-30-2025 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 17944891)
Why does our media think its a good idea to stuff a camera and microphone in front of a person experiencing the worst moment in their lives? Nobody needs to see that shit.

For the clicks and attention

Third Eye 01-30-2025 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VAChief (Post 17944885)
I know it would be expensive, but maybe it's time to begin to shut down commercial flights into Reagan, transition to just government and military air space.

Dulles and Baltimore would need to be expanded, and maybe another airport in either Northern Virgina or Maryland. The metro now goes out directly to Dulles. It couldn't happen all at once, but that traffic around the Potomac is crazy and their is only ONE runway where heavies can land.

You are probably right, but man, it's so much more convenient flying into Reagan.

KCUnited 01-30-2025 08:55 AM

Yeah I'm not watching that interview

What a terrible tragedy

ChiTown 01-30-2025 08:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RockChalk (Post 17944893)
I've only flown into / out of Reagan once, all my other trips out there have been into Dulles / BWI, but I was astonished to see all of the non-commercial flying going on around it.

I use that flight a lot from Wichita because it’s easy to get into Baltimore from DCA. Prayers to these families. I’ve been spending my time tracking down people I know that take that route. Tragic.

alpha_omega 01-30-2025 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 17944891)
Why does our media think its a good idea to stuff a camera and microphone in front of a person experiencing the worst moment in their lives?....

This x infinity.

RockChalk 01-30-2025 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 17944909)
I use that flight a lot from Wichita because it’s easy to get into Baltimore from DCA. Prayers to these families. I’ve been spending my time tracking down people I know that take that route. Tragic.

My wife's cousin was originally supposed to be on that flight but she ended up changing flights to go back home (North Dakota) for a few days and grabbed a flight out of Grand Forks instead.

RockChalk 01-30-2025 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 17944891)
Why does our media think its a good idea to stuff a camera and microphone in front of a person experiencing the worst moment in their lives? Nobody needs to see that shit.

Clicks clicks and more clicks Most media gave up on any kind of actual reporting because half (or more) of the population doesn't have the attention span for it anymore.

DaFace 01-30-2025 09:43 AM

Continuing to read through discussions about this from people who actually know the aviation industry, it seems like the most likely explanation is that the black hawk said they had the CRJ in sight, but they were looking at the wrong plane.

It's hard as a civilian to understand how that can happen, and I have to imagine they're going to take a long look at standard practices in that area to ensure this can't happen again. Even if it's technically pilot error, there shouldn't be a situation where looking at the wrong lights in the dark ends up killing 70 people.

Just terrible.

Deberg_1990 01-30-2025 11:40 AM

Apparently 1/3rd of the people on the flight were figure skaters or people in that circle. The US figure skating championships were just in Wichita a few days ago.

Kiimo 01-30-2025 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 17944952)
Continuing to read through discussions about this from people who actually know the aviation industry, it seems like the most likely explanation is that the black hawk said they had the CRJ in sight, but they were looking at the wrong plane.

It's hard as a civilian to understand how that can happen, and I have to imagine they're going to take a long look at standard practices in that area to ensure this can't happen again. Even if it's technically pilot error, there shouldn't be a situation where looking at the wrong lights in the dark ends up killing 70 people.

Just terrible.



There are systems already in place where multiple things have to go wrong for anything to happen which is why nothing had happened in 16 years of constant flights all over the country. In short, there won't be one thing that went wrong it's a failure across multiple things.

Frazod 01-30-2025 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 17944891)
Why does our media think its a good idea to stuff a camera and microphone in front of a person experiencing the worst moment in their lives? Nobody needs to see that shit.

I guarantee that if I was ever in that position and one of those shitheads stuck a mic in my face, my answer would be about as far from cordial as you could get.

I've often wondered why more people don't just tell them to **** off.

Megatron96 01-30-2025 12:04 PM

It's extremely difficult to pick up a helo in the dark. And the slower the helo is moving, the harder it is to spot them. plus, CRJs don't have the greatest visuals anyway. Not as bad as a Metro, but not a lot better either.


Terrible tragedy.

suzzer99 01-30-2025 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 17944952)
Continuing to read through discussions about this from people who actually know the aviation industry, it seems like the most likely explanation is that the black hawk said they had the CRJ in sight, but they were looking at the wrong plane.

It's hard as a civilian to understand how that can happen, and I have to imagine they're going to take a long look at standard practices in that area to ensure this can't happen again. Even if it's technically pilot error, there shouldn't be a situation where looking at the wrong lights in the dark ends up killing 70 people.

Just terrible.

Quote:

Quote:

If it was in the airspace of the airport the air traffic controller tells the chopper to adjust its height and the chopper has to do so.

Kind of but not really. But aside from numerous technical caveats that would be getting off subject I'll just say tower is never going to try to separate by altitude in this spot. The route the helicopter was on is already restricted to 200' max, which is recklessly low in any other context, so tower will never give instructions to go to a lower altitude. Even if they wanted to tell the helicopter to literally skim the water the airplane will be low enough on approach to make that extremely uncomfortable separation.

They're not going to tell them to go higher either. The airplane needs space above in case they need to abort their approach and go around, not to mention just having enough space in case their approach is a bit higher or longer than standard. And the helicopter was tasked with maintaining visual separation, which makes sense as they're more maneuverable and in cruise flight vs a jet that has slowed to near stall speed and needs to maintain a pretty tight path to land on a short runway. You want the aircraft seeing and avoiding to be lower because cockpit visibility is a lot better looking up than looking down. And >99% of the time helicopters are cruising lower than jets so it makes sense to keep them that way unless you have a really good reason to switch them up. And by the time you have that reason it's too late to coordinate it. That's the reason the helicopter route is restricted to 200', with nearby routes allowing higher the further away you get from the airport. It keeps helicopter traffic separated from jets in nearly all cases outside of the jet's short final.

Bottom line, lateral separation is the only way to deconflict in this spot.

Quote:

Being night time the helicopter will have its own radar or it shouldn’t be flying at night, but my sister is a pilot and it’s kind of surprising these don’t happen more often as most helicopters don’t have radar and good luck always spotting a plane coming toward you as fast as planes travel and taking the right course to avoid.
The technology you're thinking of isn't radar but it displays similarly for pilots. Also not a night requirement and shouldn't be (should be day and night). There is a requirement as of 2020 for **civilian** aircraft to be equipped with the half of the technology that broadcasts your own information so other aircraft can see you on their "radar". But there's no requirement to have the side that lets you see what everyone else is broadcasting (again there should be, but this is an expensive upgrade for a small airplane).

The Black Hawk doesn't necessarily broadcast anything because government aircraft are exempt from the requirement. Older Black Hawks aren't even capable. I believe the Army has upgraded theirs to have the capability to broadcast but it can be turned off. As far as I know the unit who had this accident is in the habit of leaving their broadcast on, at least for training flights. I used to fly with an organization that insisted theirs remain off and it's ****ing stupid. So the airplane likely would've "seen" the helicopter on their "radar" but that doesn't do much good when they're trusting the helicopter to avoid them and DC runs traffic tight enough and the resolution on these things is broad enough you have to ignore the alerts.

What's really stupid is Black Hawks don't have the receiving end of the technology or at least no capability to display it to the pilots. So the helicopter wouldn't have had any "radar" showing the airplane or any alerts outside of ATC's warnings. Maybe an iPad with a moving map showing traffic, but you're not looking at that flying 200' off the Potomac and it's not giving you aural warnings. I flew Black Hawks for 15 years and now fly much cheaper civilian helicopters but I have the "radar" display now. I wouldn't say it saves me cause I survived without it for 15 years but there are multiple times a month where it gives me useful enough information I'm glad to have it. In fact just a few days ago I was thinking "I can't believe I flew so long without this and it's dumb that there are still people flying around without it." So keeping in mind clovis's valid point that we can't know what caused this accident, would it have been avoided if we could drag the military's fleet of aircraft into the 21st century? Almost definitely, yes.
From a professional helicopter pilot I know from another forum.

seamonster 01-30-2025 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 17945239)
From a professional helicopter pilot I know from another forum.

They've got to ground these morons. Keep them and other "VIPs" from flying prehistoric choppers near a busy commercial airport hub. Jesus.

BigRichard 01-30-2025 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frazod (Post 17945166)
I guarantee that if I was ever in that position and one of those shitheads stuck a mic in my face, my answer would be about as far from cordial as you could get.

I've often wondered why more people don't just tell them to **** off.

It probably happens more often then we get to see... they just don't show those interactions.

notorious 01-30-2025 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 17944740)
I heard it was a training flight that wasn’t entered into the FAA ledger so the air traffic controllers were out of the loop.

We will all eventually get the truth of what happened.

They still talk to clearance, ground, tower, and departure. ESPECIALLY around DC.


DC is the most controlled airspace in the world.

notorious 01-30-2025 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimo (Post 17945164)
There are systems already in place where multiple things have to go wrong for anything to happen which is why nothing had happened in 16 years of constant flights all over the country. In short, there won't be one thing that went wrong it's a failure across multiple things.

The Swiss cheese holes lined up.

notorious 01-30-2025 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 17945239)
From a professional helicopter pilot I know from another forum.

Military aircraft avionics are complete shit compared to most civilian aircraft.

I was hanging out in the Amarillo FBO some F-16s pulled up and parked.

I don't ever pass up the chance to talk to the baddest ass mother ****ers on the planet so we chatted about stuff. I was flying a low tail Piper Lance (a very nice one) and they asked me about it. Had dual Garmin 430's in it which was sensational back in 2002. I took them out to show them and they were blown away at how nice the dash was. One guy said he would kill to have one moving map GPS in his plane. They had a light indicator that verified via GPS receiver that LORAN was accurate.

That blew me away. 25 million dollar airplane. I hope things have changed.

RedRaider56 01-30-2025 05:05 PM

Looks like the ATC was working two different areas, simultaneously ... Yikes.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/staffing-...ion-faa-report

Kiimo 01-30-2025 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedRaider56 (Post 17945704)
Looks like the ATC was working two different areas, simultaneously ... Yikes.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/staffing-...ion-faa-report



This is a nothing nonsense inflammatory story. This happens all the time, everywhere.


That would actually HELP the situation, not hinder it.

RedRaider56 01-30-2025 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimo (Post 17945766)
This is a nothing nonsense inflammatory story. This happens all the time, everywhere.


That would actually HELP the situation, not hinder it.


Good to know. Not passing judgement, just going to follow what the NTSB investigation uncovers

Kiimo 01-30-2025 06:02 PM

Just pointing it out mostly because the article makes it sound like one person running both is overloading the ATC guy but actually coordinating everything with one person has less room for error than two. Communication is essential when there are two.

seamonster 01-30-2025 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimo (Post 17945773)
Just pointing it out mostly because the article makes it sound like one person running both is overloading the ATC guy but actually coordinating everything with one person has less room for error than two. Communication is essential when there are two.

Sounds like the onus is completely on the Blackhawk to maintain "visual separation".

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/hfgllf1L9_4?si=L_gw0s_qz-sWB_DQ" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" allowfullscreen></iframe>

notorious 01-30-2025 06:25 PM

If the Blackhawk had ADS-B out the plane would have known exactly where he was and probably would have been all over it.

The situational awareness that system provides is amazing.

Demonpenz 01-31-2025 12:23 AM

Rerunkc should give us the skinny

Ocotillo 01-31-2025 11:10 AM

Edited to put the video in spoiler tags. There is something about seeing in detail the moment that 60+ people lose their lives that I feel needs a warning. Watch at your own risk. -Dartgod

Spoiler!

notorious 01-31-2025 11:45 AM

Jesus.

R Clark 01-31-2025 11:46 AM

Damn talk about a head on

seamonster 01-31-2025 11:58 AM

After watching that video I don't want to here shit about understaffed air traffic controller's...That was one of the worst ****ing video's I've ever seen in my life. How do you not see a commercial jet, lit up like a football stadium, barreling down at your position?

BigRedChief 01-31-2025 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R Clark (Post 17946370)
Damn talk about a head on

I understand a passenger jet can’t maneuver like the Blackhawk. But, it looks from this video that the Blackhawk never attempted to avoid the aircraft. Even at the last minute.

ChiTown 01-31-2025 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 17946398)
I understand a passenger jet can’t maneuver like the Blackhawk. But, it looks from this video that the Blackhawk never attempted to avoid the aircraft. Even at the last minute.

The voice transponders have been collected. It'll be interesting to find out what sort of info they unearth from that.

Bowser 01-31-2025 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seamonster (Post 17946391)
After watching that video I don't want to here shit about understaffed air traffic controller's...That was one of the worst ****ing video's I've ever seen in my life. How do you not see a commercial jet, lit up like a football stadium, barreling down at your position?

Yeah, those lights are bright to look at miles out, much less a thousand feet or less.

WilliamTheIrish 01-31-2025 12:14 PM

Statement from the Sec Def said they were wearing NVG’s.

Damn.

New World Order 01-31-2025 12:16 PM

Almost looks like the helicopter pilot did it intentionally…

suzzer99 01-31-2025 12:34 PM

Here's the link on CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/31/us/vi...deo-ldn-digvid

Why was someone filming that?

ChiTown 01-31-2025 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by suzzer99 (Post 17946439)
Here's the link on CNN: https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/31/us/vi...deo-ldn-digvid

Why was someone filming that?

I used to wonder about these things myself, but then I quickly realized that people are constantly videoing the most inane things all day, everyday. So, this doesn't really surprise me that someone caught this on video.

DaFace 01-31-2025 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seamonster (Post 17946391)
After watching that video I don't want to here shit about understaffed air traffic controller's...That was one of the worst ****ing video's I've ever seen in my life. How do you not see a commercial jet, lit up like a football stadium, barreling down at your position?

Things happen fast when it's two vehicles moving at 150+ mph, in the dark, with lots of other lights around and massive blind spots, all while trying to listen in and follow instructions on crowded radio channels.

Radar Chief 01-31-2025 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 17945494)
Military aircraft avionics are complete shit compared to most civilian aircraft.

I was hanging out in the Amarillo FBO some F-16s pulled up and parked.

I don't ever pass up the chance to talk to the baddest ass mother ****ers on the planet so we chatted about stuff. I was flying a low tail Piper Lance (a very nice one) and they asked me about it. Had dual Garmin 430's in it which was sensational back in 2002. I took them out to show them and they were blown away at how nice the dash was. One guy said he would kill to have one moving map GPS in his plane. They had a light indicator that verified via GPS receiver that LORAN was accurate.

That blew me away. 25 million dollar airplane. I hope things have changed.

Military Technology generally lags civilian technology by several years.
For example, when I joined the Army in '88 the HAWK system I would work on was still using vacuum tubes in the PAR, or Pulsing Acquisition Radar.

Megatron96 01-31-2025 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seamonster (Post 17946391)
After watching that video I don't want to here shit about understaffed air traffic controller's...That was one of the worst ****ing video's I've ever seen in my life. How do you not see a commercial jet, lit up like a football stadium, barreling down at your position?



Happens all the time. especially in the dark. And how well lit up the aircraft is dependent on the angle at which you're viewing it (head-on and you're looking into a giant landing light, but from the side or behind it's just recog/nav/logo lights). And the CRJ was necessarily moving at 200+, while the helo was moving at some fraction of that. Depending on the actual angle of intercept, altitude difference, etc. there may not have been a lot of angular change/movement across the field of view, which would make spotting each other more difficult.

Bottom line, it's almost impossible to really understand the spatial relationships between these aircraft from just the video. We need the radar tape at the very least. Another video from a different angle would also be helpful.

SAGA45 01-31-2025 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief (Post 17946488)
Military Technology generally lags civilian technology by several years.

That's wild! I always thought it was the opposite. I guess that's just in the movies.

Marcellus 01-31-2025 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief (Post 17946398)
I understand a passenger jet can’t maneuver like the Blackhawk. But, it looks from this video that the Blackhawk never attempted to avoid the aircraft. Even at the last minute.


From what I heard on a podcast this morning from someone who talked with several experienced ATC's -

The Blackhawk never saw the plane as it was above them at the time. You cant look up in a Blackhawk helicopter as you cant see through the roof.

It also appears the ATC asked if they could see the plane, well the only plane the Blackhawk could have seen was the one taking off not the one above them. When the Blackhawk said yes they could see the plane the ATC should have known they were seeing the wrong plane as they cant physically see one that is above them.

The ATC is almost certainly at fault here. Should have told the Blackhawk to drop to 1500ft.

Also there is supposed to be an ATC handling Helicopters and another handling fixed wing but the same guy was doing both.

Pennywise 01-31-2025 01:54 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">How is it possible the Blackhawk pilots did not see the AA jet.<a href="https://t.co/EAe4Q0j2y9">pic.twitter.com/EAe4Q0j2y9</a></p>&mdash; Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) <a href="https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1885414739578147018?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 31, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

That barrel roll is absolutely brutal. I also heard on the radio earlier it was relatively easy to recover most of the passengers because they were still strapped in their seatbelts. :(

Smed1065 01-31-2025 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17946522)
From what I heard on a podcast this morning from someone who talked with several experienced ATC's -

The Blackhawk never saw the plane as it was above them at the time. You cant look up in a Blackhawk helicopter as you cant see through the roof.

It also appears the ATC asked if they could see the plane, well the only plane the Blackhawk could have seen was the one taking off not the one above them. When the Blackhawk said yes they could see the plane the ATC should have known they were seeing the wrong plane as they cant physically see one that is above them.

The ATC is almost certainly at fault here. Should have told the Blackhawk to drop to 1500ft.

Also there is supposed to be an ATC handling Helicopters and another handling fixed wing but the same guy was doing both.

The rules must have changed because hen I was ATC we even did planes, copters and even Drones but I was military so might be the difference.That and been a long time.

DaFace 01-31-2025 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17946522)
From what I heard on a podcast this morning from someone who talked with several experienced ATC's -

The Blackhawk never saw the plane as it was above them at the time. You cant look up in a Blackhawk helicopter as you cant see through the roof.

It also appears the ATC asked if they could see the plane, well the only plane the Blackhawk could have seen was the one taking off not the one above them. When the Blackhawk said yes they could see the plane the ATC should have known they were seeing the wrong plane as they cant physically see one that is above them.

The ATC is almost certainly at fault here. Should have told the Blackhawk to drop to 1500ft.

Also there is supposed to be an ATC handling Helicopters and another handling fixed wing but the same guy was doing both.

And, likewise, you can't see below a jet very well either, so it's pretty likely that neither aircraft saw the other.

I'd be surprised if there was a true error on the ATC side, as it sounds like the flight rules in the area allow for visual separation. The ATC pointed out the heading of the CRJ, and the Black Hawk pilot confirmed that they had a visual on it. That very probably seems like a miscommunication and mistake on the pilot's part. All that said, I think it's a very valid question if the flight rules in the area should be reconsidered.

All that said, others have alluded to the "swiss cheese" metaphor, and it's very likely that it applies here. Some level of fault lies with:
-BH flying "dark" and, therefore, not visible on CRJ's equipment
-Short-staffed ATC having one person working multiple roles, which isn't unusual but might need to be considered due to the complexity of this airspace
-ATC not understanding that the BH couldn't actually have a visual on the CRJ (assuming that's true)
-Rules that allow helicopters to fly directly into the descent path at all
-Rules that allow for visual separation in the area
-Simple BH pilot error

Time will tell what they conclude in the investigation, but it sure seems like this is iffy enough that they should change how things operate in the area.

Marcellus 01-31-2025 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 17946559)
And, likewise, you can't see below a jet very well either, so it's pretty likely that neither aircraft saw the other.

I'd be surprised if there was a true error on the ATC side, as it sounds like the flight rules in the area allow for visual separation. The ATC pointed out the heading of the CRJ, and the Black Hawk pilot confirmed that they had a visual on it. That very probably seems like a miscommunication and mistake on the pilot's part. All that said, I think it's a very valid question if the flight rules in the area should be reconsidered.

All that said, others have alluded to the "swiss cheese" metaphor, and it's very likely that it applies here. Some level of fault lies with:
-BH flying "dark" and, therefore, not visible on CRJ's equipment
-Short-staffed ATC having one person working multiple roles, which isn't unusual but might need to be considered due to the complexity of this airspace
-ATC not understanding that the BH couldn't actually have a visual on the CRJ (assuming that's true)
-Rules that allow helicopters to fly directly into the descent path at all
-Rules that allow for visual separation in the area
-Simple BH pilot error

Time will tell what they conclude in the investigation, but it sure seems like this is iffy enough that they should change how things operate in the area.

Probably a combination of those thigs listed which is almost always the case.

The staffing issue seems to be pretty glaring to me though. That's WHY the ATC exist, to keep this shit from happening.

Megatron96 01-31-2025 02:17 PM

Rarely will the NTSB/FAA find that an accident was the result of just one mistake. It usually is a domino effect of several mistakes. They will usually find that one aircrew/group was mostly responsible. Until we have a lot more information, we're all just guessing.

seamonster 01-31-2025 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaFace (Post 17946559)
And, likewise, you can't see below a jet very well either, so it's pretty likely that neither aircraft saw the other.

I'd be surprised if there was a true error on the ATC side, as it sounds like the flight rules in the area allow for visual separation. The ATC pointed out the heading of the CRJ, and the Black Hawk pilot confirmed that they had a visual on it. That very probably seems like a miscommunication and mistake on the pilot's part. All that said, I think it's a very valid question if the flight rules in the area should be reconsidered.

All that said, others have alluded to the "swiss cheese" metaphor, and it's very likely that it applies here. Some level of fault lies with:
-BH flying "dark" and, therefore, not visible on CRJ's equipment
-Short-staffed ATC having one person working multiple roles, which isn't unusual but might need to be considered due to the complexity of this airspace
-ATC not understanding that the BH couldn't actually have a visual on the CRJ (assuming that's true)
-Rules that allow helicopters to fly directly into the descent path at all
-Rules that allow for visual separation in the area
-Simple BH pilot error

Time will tell what they conclude in the investigation, but it sure seems like this is iffy enough that they should change how things operate in the area.

Laughable to claim the pilot couldn't see the plane after watching that video. Especially considering <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/01/31/dc-plane-crash-helicopter-airport-updates/">they were flying well above their 200ft ceiling.</a>

Megatron96 01-31-2025 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seamonster (Post 17946568)
Laughable to claim the pilot couldn't see the plane after watching that video. Especially considering <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/01/31/dc-plane-crash-helicopter-airport-updates/">they were flying well above their 200ft ceiling.</a>



You would be surprised at how often pilots can't pick up other aircraft, or to be more precise, the exact aircraft ATC is warning you about.

DaFace 01-31-2025 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seamonster (Post 17946568)
Laughable to claim the pilot couldn't see the plane after watching that video. Especially considering <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2025/01/31/dc-plane-crash-helicopter-airport-updates/">they were flying well above their 200ft ceiling.</a>

I don't think any of us here have anywhere near the expertise to definitively conclude anything about what they could or couldn't see. I just know that other incidents that outsiders would conclude should have been easily avoided are less so once they really look at the factors at play. It's obviously not the same situation, but an A350 collided with a coast guard plane on the runway in Japan a year ago. People have asked how it's possible that the A350 wouldn't have seen the coast guard plane sitting on the runway, which seems logical until they actually mocked up what it would look like to the pilots...

https://i.imgur.com/IIXO6yB.png

(Note the slight break in the centerline about halfway down the runway. That's what they estimate the coast guard plane looked like to the A350 pilots.)

This is why investigations are important. We can guess all we want, but until they carefully study everything that happened, we don't really know where the fault lies.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.