|
49ers Brandon Aiyuk has requested a trade
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Brandon Aiyuk is under contract for a little more than $14 million this season. The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/49ers?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#49ers</a> survived a trade request from Deebo Samuel. We’ll see if they can find their way through this one from Aiyuk. <a href="https://t.co/jKpRuBqOkJ">https://t.co/jKpRuBqOkJ</a></p>— Mike Garafolo (@MikeGarafolo) <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeGarafolo/status/1813260580117250128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 16, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Lol and they haven’t even paid Purdy yet
|
The cap applying the figure four to the niner knee bone right now!
|
He's not going anywhere until next offseason.
Like the Bengals with Higgins, they will tell him to get ****ed, because they're all-in on a SB this year. |
God that would be a wet dream but we're the last team in the universe sf would deal with
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Eagles got way better, Lions are still really good and experienced, Packers on the rise and their division will be better. Rams won 10 games in a rebuild year, Seahawks rebuilding and won 9. Mike McDonald embarrassed Rat Jr’s offense last year and has nice pieces on his new team. Could see 49ers drop to a 4 or 5 seed tbh. |
Quote:
|
He'll be a 9er this year. They've got the leverage unless he wants to go full nuclear.
|
Quote:
|
We don’t need him.
Bart knows what he’s doing. This team is going cheap at WR and LT but investing ample draft capital at both positions. |
Quote:
|
He isn't going anywhere unless someone pony's up big picks and a lot of money. Not happening for both. He's not and elite player.
|
I hope a team doesn’t go full-reerun and hand them a future haul of picks.
You know they are out there. |
Give them Toney and Skyy
|
Quote:
|
Guess he doesn't like coming in 2nd
|
|
Quote:
|
Deebo and Robbie Gould both requested trades too and they both got deals.
Nothing more than a scare tactic |
Quote:
|
I think I read somewhere that Aiyuk is looking for close to $30 million/yr, and SF only wants to pay him in the low to mid $20s. I get that he's a top-10 WR the last season or two, but he's not on the same tier with JJ, Davante Adams, Tyreek, Amon-Ra, etc., imo. He should take the $24 million/yr or whatever and try to win SBs in SF. Wherever he gets traded to, they won't be in real contention for a Ring anytime soon; it's how they'll be able to afford him, fcs.
|
Quote:
But as of right now, yeah we're loaded and don't need it |
30 million for Aiyuk would be dumb as ****
|
Quote:
Honestly, if you're such a great QB whisperer like he has the reputation of, he should have at least gone .500 in those seasons. Andy did that shit all the time. |
He is definitely not coming here. We shouldn’t really need him given the improvement in our WR room. And there’s no way we would pay what he would want. And no way San Francisco would trade him to us. I expect he’ll stay in San Francisco and try to improve his negotiating position for when he probably goes somewhere else next year.
But I do wonder if the chargers will make an attractive offer. |
If Aiyuk wanted $30mil/yr maybe he should've showed up to play in the Super Bowl. Bro got outplayed by Jennings. And for those giving all of the credit to Sneed and McDuffy blanketing him, for $30mil/yr you better figure out a way to get open.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Without reading the posts, he ain't going NO WHERE! He will be tagged unless a team like the Commanders or whoever makes a ridiculous offer for him. Either way, he stays and plays for the 49ers. Nothing to see here move along.
|
In years past this would be a 250 reply thread by now minimum. Chiefs planet has lost its burst.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I wouldn't pay a lot of assets to get Aiyuk if I were a rebuilding team, but a team that is close to winning a SB and is in need of a stud WR then I would definitely consider it. Green Bay for example is a great team but doesn't have a number 1 WR right now. It all depends on the current roster. Aiyuk is a top 10 WR. Now if you were to ask me should Kansas City give multiple 1sts to get him, I would say no way. |
49ers Brandon Aiyuk has requested a trade
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now tight ends.should be a focus on keeping them elite mainly for cost comparison. |
Don't think he will be available but I would look at that for KC.
We don't have a #1 and Kelce is aging out soon. When Kelce retires we will need someone just like this. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> are signing former Slippery Rock WR Kyle Sheets, per source. Sheets originally signed with New Orleans as an undrafted free agent.</p>— Tom Pelissero (@TomPelissero) <a href="https://twitter.com/TomPelissero/status/1813580069929119795?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 17, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What's a slippery rock? <iframe scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html?origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.chiefsplanet.com" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;" frameborder="0"> </iframe><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: medium none;" title="Twitter analytics iframe" frameborder="0"></iframe> |
Quote:
|
I could see Texas making an offer and paying him. Great young QB on a rookie deal.
|
Quote:
We already have our savior edit: We also don't need Slippery Sheets |
Quote:
|
I'd ask for a trade if I had to play with Brock Purdy too.
|
Unpopular opinion:
I’d rather hold onto Mcaffrey, Aiyuk and deebo and roll with a guy like Jimmy g than lose one of those 3 and go with Purdy |
I agree.
Pay Aiyuk, keep McCaffrey and Deebo, plus all the other talent, trade Purdy to NYG and pkg some picks to move up for a 1st round QB on another cost controlled rookie deal to take that talent filled roster over the top. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If Jimmy G were still serviceable as a game manager starting QB, he'd still be making Geno money at a minimum. I don't know if the Niners could give top-end deals at their respective positions to all those guys and still dole out Geno money to their QB. And if they did, they'd for sure be seeing some cuts to some to their defense. I get that Trent Williams is going to retire soon. That will help them, certainly, but they've still got 2 $100 million WRs, a pricey TE contract, the top RB contract, a top 3 DE contract, a top 10 CB contract, yadda yadda yadda. Purdy costs them nothing and that's the only real reason why they can consider extending Aiyuk right now. |
They might be the first team to have 100M tied up in a QB/WR combo in the upcoming years with Purdy eligible for an extension after this year.
With Aiuyuk, I suspect that they will franchise him next year and then extend him in 2026 making him a damn near a 40M a year receiver. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Deebo is gone after this year, he’s not really a wr. If they’re smart they’d pay aiyuk, keep him with purdy and trade deebo next offseason or cut him.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pretty good is an understatement |
Quote:
|
Can't wait to piss pound the Texans
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Big WR that can eat 10+ targets a game such as Michael Pittman. Sorry that this is too hard for you to understand. |
Quote:
If everyone stays healthy and Diggs gets stuff back on track they'll be a top 10 passing offense. That team still plans to pound the football on the ground. |
Why wouldn't the Lions make an all-in move like this? The NFC is as bad as I can ever remember. That Lions team is one more major piece away from making a Super Bowl.
Montgomery and Gibbs at running back. LaPorta at TE. St Brown, Aiyuk and Williams at receiver. That is a Super Bowl roster. Give it to that poor fanbase they deserve it. |
Quote:
|
I think this is damaged beyond repair.
|
Quote:
But then fortunately for them, Shanahan can make use of a tweener like Deebo better than most. Based on what happened last season, I’d bet they’ll look to at least negotiate with Deebo. It looks like Aiyuk is the odd man out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Rashee Rice looks to be every bit as productive as Pittman, having caught more TDs in his rookie season than Pittman ever has. His yards would be Pittman's third best total. Maybe you should familiarize yourself with the players on THIS team. |
Quote:
He was used as a bully slot last year and caught most of his passes at the LOS. That's great. That's nice but his route tree and usage needs to expand this year. |
Quote:
Just look at the SB tape. Deebo couldn't separate from our great cover corners, while Aiyuk was getting open consistently. Aiyuk is an actual WR. Deebo is an offensive weapon. If they choose Deebo over Aiyuk, it's about a difference in money, because Aiyuk is the better player all things even. |
Quote:
I disagree. The last healthy season Deebo had, he put up 1400 receiving yards (plus another 350 on the ground). If they value Aiyuk over Deebo, it’ll be due to the fact that Deebo’s role in their offense is more likely to lead to him getting hurt than Aiyuk’s traditional usage. |
Quote:
Again, watch the SB tape. One guy couldn't get open while the other was doing it consistently. I understand Deebo is a valuable weapon, but weapons aren't more valuable than legit WR1s that can run a full route tree and separate consistently. And just pointing to his 1,400 yard season means nothing. Why do you constantly do this? "Blake Bortles is a good QB because he threw 30+ TDs". Stats mean nothing without context. Deebo is what he is. He's a playmaker and he's fantastic with the ball in his hands. He racks up receiving yardage after the catch. He's not a route runner or separator though, and those guys are more valuable. |
Quote:
|
Deebo was hurt during the SB. First half, iirc. First, he reinjured his shoulder, then his hamstring.
Which is the problem with keeping Deebo over Aiyuk; he's had a recent history of injuries. But from a football perspective, I think I'd rather keep Deebo; he's more versatile. Shanahan can line up Deebo in the slot, out wide, in the backfield, even at the H and T. He's not the pure WR that Aiyuk is, but from a coach's perspective you can find more uses for him. Also, when you look at SF's statistical efficiency over the last few seasons, Deebo makes more of a difference than Aiyuk, iirc. |
Quote:
Deebo has never been a route runner or separator. That's not who he is, and he will never be that guy. He's a very valuable weapon, but he's essentially a WR/RB tweener, and that's not as valuable as a legitimate WR that can run a full route tree and separate consistently. If all things were even, the 49ers would still 100% choose Aiyuk over Deebo. |
Quote:
“Both of these guys have 4+ years worth of games but look at this one in particular that fits my narrative” lol You’re such a clown. The reason this guy is open consistently is because he’s the fourth option on a stacked offense. No one goes into a game against the 9ers worried about Aiyuk. They’re checking for CMC first, then Deebo, then Kittle. |
Quote:
It was a fact. Deebo suffered a shoulder injury earlier in the year that kept him from playing for a few games. Then he reinjured it in the NFCCG, I think. Then he injured his hammy. Now, I don't know about you, but I can't run very well/fast when I tweak my hammy. And in that "Receiver" show, Deebo told one of his trainers on camera that he couldn't move his left arm without experiencing a lot of pain (I think, might've been a teammate). Now, we agree that Aiyuk is the better WR. It's just my opinion that Deebo is the more versatile weapon. Ymmv. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
