Chiefs release Ben Grubbs
 

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...iled-physical/

Just a year after trading for Ben Grubbs and giving him a new four-year deal, the Kansas City Chiefs are parting ways with the veteran guard.

According to Howard Balzer of the Sports Xchange, the Chiefs released Grubbs on Wednesday with a failed physical designation.

Grubbs played in just seven games for the Chiefs before landing on injured reserve with a neck injury.

The Chiefs replaced Grubbs at left guard with Jeff Allen and Zach Fulton for the remainder of the season. But Allen signed with the Houston Texans on Wednesday, leaving the Chiefs with one fewer option to potentially replace Grubbs this season.

Fulton and Jah Reid would be potentially replacements already on the Kansas City roster.

Grubbs turns 32 on Thursday. He could still see interest on the market from line-needy teams if he can move beyond the neck injury that ended his 2015 season.

Writing was on the wall once they re-signed Jaye Howard. Aging defensive tackles in today's NFL are a dime a dozen.

Grubbs plays OG you dumbass

:spock::spock:

LMAO WTF?

What is the cap hit on this move? Kind of a bummer deal. At least the trade wasn't for much

Dude.....you need work on your football takes...

ROFL ROFL

.
ROFLROFLROFL

June 1 designation or nah?

Also, it's good to have a GM that's not afraid to admit mistakes.

This is writing on the wall material.

Well done, Mother****er.

As I see it, LDT spent most of the 2014 season working as a LG, then moved to the right side last preseason.

Chiefs might move him back to the left side this offseason, with Reid taking over on the right.

Releasing Grubbs was an inevitable no-brainer.

This saves the Chiefs $1.1 million against the cap, but leaves behind $5.2 million in dead money.

Cant say I'm very surprised, or concerned... he was somewhat of a disappointment

Out with the old, in with the new

Geoff Schwartz, come on down!

Yep. He's Mitchell's brother. :)

Damn, I had this one wrong. Thought we'd keep him around another year. Guess the injury is pretty bad. Wonder if we get any of that money opened up due to failed physical?

Now let's dump Fanaika.

Agreed. He'd be a terrific swing linemen for the bench. The chiefs concern right now isn't starters. It's bench depth. We need a few utility linemen who can play multiple positions. In addition to Schwartz we need to find a cheap but effective backup LT.

giving Grubbs a new contract immediately was not one of Dorsey's better moves

It wasn't a bad move. We were cap-strapped last year..... couldn't afford his expensive Saints contract.

There are better way to do it.

Ways that don't create more dead money


Pretty much the worst thing you can do when dealing with the cap is create dead money.

Free agency is just as much of a gamble as the draft.

If the signing worked out, it would have given us a much stronger OL.

And please, tell us how to manage the cap correctly....ROFL

They didn't redo the contract to generate dead money. They didn't know he wouldn't be able to pass a physical this season when they did it.
If Grubbs could have passed his physical and contributed this year then it would have been considered a good cap move.

Tamba's contract, on the other hand, deliberately created dead money in a season where the Chiefs knew they'd have more cap space to work with.

It was a trade, not FA

I know quite a bit about the cap, at least the old cap.

Dead money is the main thing to be avoided, everything else is workable.

Of course they didn't do it to intentionally created dead money but giving a guy a new contract when you did have to is risking that.

They could have freed up money using another player that we knew what we had.

$5.2m in dead money and $1.1m in savings.

I don't blame him for not knowing Grubbs. Dude was a shit salad. Might as well have been a WR.

We have dead money in Grubbs because Dorsey signed him to a deal that was going to be cheap yearly after giving him a decent signing bonus.

If the deal works out, Dorsey looks like the genius he is...but the guy was having trouble changing to a new blocking scheme and then hurt his neck before he could acclimate.

As a fan, I'd love to see Dorsey continue to take shots like that.

It's not always going to work out.

FWIW cutting Fanaika would leave us $1.1m in dead money and only save $966k

Name it.

The way Dorsey did it also created $4 million in rollover by drastically reducing in cap hit for last season. That $4 million in roll-over will essentially cover his dead money for this season.

The extension didn't hurt us. At all. His cap hit for the 2015 season was reduced by enough to pay for the dead money created. It was dollar in, dollar out.

The trade was fine. The extension was fine (and really, the upside built into it was enormous). It just didn't work out.

That's football.

He was cut because he failed the physical. I thought if a player fails a physical the salary is not counted against the salary cap and is thus not dead money. If he's cut in general, yes, but not in these circumstances.

Maybe I missed that but at least I knew Grubbs played guard.

If that was the case, teams would be reporting players "failed physicals" all the time......

Lord no.

Every team has its own baselines for failed physicals. If a team could just designate guys with a failed physical designation anytime they wanted to avoid a cap hit, the abuse would be off the charts.

The Redskins took a cap hit for a dude that got murdered. The NFL doesn't really give a great number of ****s when it comes to your cap hit - you're pretty much always going to have to deal with that dead money.

Physical exams are available for independent verification so the union can see player passed or failed to avoid this problem. If a player retires the salary is not d ad money because the player is backing out of the contract. If the player fails the physical, the player is physically unable to complete the contract, hence it shouldn't be dead money.

I've been trying to find an answer this morning. I should be working.

Again, your very premise is incorrect.

When a player retires, his money generally counts against the cap. I believe there are limited exceptions granted for signing bonus money that is able to be re-captured by the team, however. For instance, if the Lions elect not to purse Megatron's remaining signing bonus, it's going to count against their cap. If he gives them the finger and fights them in court, it counts against the cap until they actually win a judgment and recover it.

If he had a roster bonus that was spread out over the remainder of the cap and it triggered in the past, that amount CANNOT be recovered by the team and any remaining pro-rated amount will accelerate against the cap.

You're way out there on what you think earns cap credits. Very few of these mechanisms do. A failed physical designation is nothing more than a courtesy extended to the rest of the league. Teams do it as a good faith measure to other squads.

He could have manipulated the contract of any player he knows he's keeping, at minimal risk. Alex Smith is not going anywhere, covert his base salary into a bonus. Smith is playing out his contract, we lose nothing.

listen ... i'm not saying Dorsey sucks or anything

but the Grubbs move didnt' work out, giving him a new contract really didn't work out

As for rollover, if we had cap room to rollover then we didn't need to make room by giving Grubbs a new contract.

we created rollever and then flush the rollover with dead money. Waste.

No tears shed here

We didn't have the cap room to rollover. It wasn't a waste at all - it created cap space that immediately paid for itself. We didn't 'flush' the rollover; we forward paid it.

The new contract made no difference at all. If you believe a Smith restructure could have been done then, well it can still be done now.

That new contract had absolutely no detrimental impact on the 2016 cap. It paid for itself.

That's been one of my favorite things about Dorsey and Reid. Pioli would have never admitted wrong doing on a player so quickly. These guys have little ego. "Well, that was a mistake, let's cut him and move forward."

It helps that they've generally done a good job of giving themselves an out and the one time they didn't, he smoked his way into giving them one.

Dorsey and Reid have never had a really painful cap cut they've had to make. Flowers was the worst and I don't believe his contract came on their watch.

So I'm not convinced they're any less likely to double down on a mistake as anyone is, they've just been very smart thus far in ensuring that their decisions are generally pretty easy ones to make.

we just disagree.

That's just as fine by me.

Getting let go and its your birthday poor Grubbs.

Signing Fanaika last year, to me, is far and away the very worst decision that Dorsey has made as the GM of this team.

It was an absolutely horrible decision, no matter how badly the Chiefs needed OL help.

That guy needed to be cut before he was ever signed.

This.

LMAO

I thought he was a Fullback. OK, actually, I had no idea who he was.

He was a waste.


Basically a piece of shit player.

Not surprised, Grubbs was on his last legs even when he was healthy, nowhere near his former Pro Bowl level play.

Bye Felicia.

Yep. That was obvious early on.

Not even close to as bad as the Dunta Robinson signing.

Fanaika was terrible, but he signed for peanuts...Robinson was trash and he signed for like 6m per.