Should the Chiefs have signed Saquon?
 

I know we didn't have a ton of cash and Pop is a decent back, but what would Saquon have looked like in our offense? He got just under $38 million over 3 years, which is a chunk. Had we not given Trav additional cap room (for no additional years) and restructured a few other deals, maybe?

Don't know, just throwing this out there.

Given what we know now, yeah, duh.

Or should have signed King Henry.

Hey everybody! Deberg is back!

Pacheco + Hunt is cheaper and will be just as effective.

Interesting question but I have a better one. Should the Chiefs have drafted Joe Montana in the 1979 draft? I still think Steve Fuller was the right move but I was only a glint in the milkman's eye back then.

With hindsight of Brown getting hurt, yeah. It made sense at the time, even though this team desperately needs some explosive run plays.

Who is better on short yardage and goalline? Thats all I care about with running backs.

Either should had sign Barkley or Henry!

Just as effective?

Saquon is on pace for 2100 yards rushing on 6 yards a carry and almost 400 yards receiving.

We don't need him but saying our guys are just as effective is silly

Pretty sure every team in the NFL should have

Did you watch tonight’s game?

Holes big enough for even MEHHH to have a big game.

Should have traded for Myles Garrett

most people here would have screamed bloody murder, but I would have liked that.

How is this Boise St running back's pro potential looking like? I wouldn't mind seeing the Chiefs trade up for him around pick 20 if he's still there if he's going to be a special RB.

We might have undervalued the RB position a bit too much, a truly great one can still make a difference. ESPECIALLY when you already have a great QB.

Devin Neal next year

Not so sure. If we had healthy Rice, Pacheco & Hollywood Brown our offense would be humming. I don't think we would have had the money to bring him in but obviously he would have made a great addition to any team.