![]() |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The Chris Jones extension is getting a lot of speculation throw around it. The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Chiefs?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Chiefs</a> have no problem paying CJ. The issue is CJ wants security and the Chiefs are trying to protect themselves from dead cap when he inevitably gets older. The money is there, it’s the structure.</p>— Chris (@chiefs_outsider) <a href="https://twitter.com/chiefs_outsider/status/1690438450107895809?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 12, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
This makes sense. |
If the money is there then Chris Jones should take it.
Because it may not be there, at the amount he wants… from any team… next offseason. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Chris Jones needs a no-trade clause and call it good.
|
Quote:
|
Sorry, been out of the country. Does this mean we haven't signed this POS yet no
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I really don't want either side to start fighting this through social media. That's always an ugly ending... |
Quote:
|
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/zsbcYSmJ_NM" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.