ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Is it time to start Foles over Smith? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=302115)

OnTheWarpath15 11-06-2016 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12531159)
Going to play a little game and take a shot every time Foles makea a throw ASS11 can't/won't. So if I quit posting after half time it will be because I passed out.

LMAO

Rausch 11-06-2016 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 12523790)
If he is symptom free and passed all the tests, why hold him out? Yes, I know it's the Jags and there isn't really reason to risk injury, but they risk injury every time they step on the field - so if he's not injured, why hold him out?

:D

rico 11-06-2016 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12531159)
Going to play a little game and take a shot every time Foles makea a throw ASS11 can't/won't. So if I quit posting after half time it will be because I passed out.

Holy shit, I'm already drunk off this game!!!!

BigCatDaddy 11-06-2016 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rico (Post 12531209)
Holy shit, I'm already drunk off this game!!!!

I thought about taking a shot every time TigerBob posted something stupid, but I want to see Foles play for more than 7 or 8 game minutes.

Mr. Flopnuts 11-06-2016 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12531159)
Going to play a little game and take a shot every time Foles makea a throw ASS11 can't/won't. So if I quit posting after half time it will be because I passed out.

LMAO LMAO

rico 11-06-2016 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 12531212)
I thought about taking a shot every time TigerBob posted something stupid, but I want to see Foles play for more than 7 or 8 game minutes.

ROFL

KranzDictum 11-06-2016 03:29 PM

It is hard to tell if Foles was bad or if it was the WR's? Macklin went out early, They were trying to throw downfield and he hit Wilson a lot but they were like 1 for on 3rd down with the West run at the end of the game the only conversion I can remember.

Foles was lucky all of his scoring drives started in scoring range or this one would have been ugly. 4 turnovers and a missed FG and only 19 points? Typical.

loochy 11-06-2016 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KranzDictum (Post 12533590)
It is hard to tell if Foles was bad or if it was the WR's? Macklin went out early, They were trying to throw downfield and he hit Wilson a lot but they were like 1 for on 3rd down with the West run at the end of the game the only conversion I can remember.

Foles was lucky all of his scoring drives started in scoring range or this one would have been ugly. 4 turnovers and a missed FG and only 19 points? Typical.

Sounds smith-like

We saw the trade offs we expected

Nice deeper throws with more chances taken and wtf moments

He is what we though he was

Bwana 11-06-2016 03:32 PM

Well this question should be answered. "Folds" needs to go back to holding a clipboard.

DaneMcCloud 11-06-2016 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bwana (Post 12533613)
Well this question should be answered. "Folds" needs to go back to holding a clipboard.

Exactly

Now, just maybe, some people will have figured out why he was beat by Case Keenum.

MMXcalibur 11-06-2016 03:32 PM

Quote:

Is it time to start Foles over Smith?
No.

petegz28 11-06-2016 03:32 PM

Yeah, like I said last week...there is a reason Foles is a backup. Dude was terrifically average at best today

ArrowheadHawk 11-06-2016 03:33 PM

Foles, ha!

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk

Bwana 11-06-2016 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12533617)
Exactly

Now, just maybe, some people will have figured out why he was beat by Case Keenum.

He made me pine away for Chase Daniel today.

Chief Roundup 11-06-2016 03:33 PM

The answer is still no and will not change.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.