ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals 2014 Royals Repository (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=279729)

Fansy the Famous Bard 07-21-2014 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 10757305)
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...cle771525.html

Good article...should put on some heat. Someone paste I'm mobile

Quote:

Hope is not a plan. Belief is not a right. Patience went out years ago. You want to talk about the problems with the Royals? That’s a good place to start.

So is this:

They regularly shrink as the moment grows.

As much as anything, that is the mark of these Royals. They laid down with four hits and no fight in a rare game that even the same-day-everyday baseball establishment recognized as important in Boston on Sunday, opening the most important second half of Royals baseball in a generation with a sweep that alternated between infuriating and incompetent.

When the Royals do this — and, basically, they do it every time expectations raise even a smidge — they expose all their other flaws in gruesome detail. They stink with the bats, haven’t developed nearly enough hitting, and are less than three months from losing the ace they mortgaged part of their future for to free-agency.

Remember when they surged into first place by winning that series in Detroit that we all thought was important at the time? The Royals are 9-17 since then, now in third place, below .500, and closer to last than first.

The Royals always seem to do this, don’t they? Grab just enough of your attention, and then scatter. For the last few years, the Royals have regularly played their worst when the attention is the heaviest.

It is often said of good teams and good players that the brighter the lights shine, the better they play.

For these Royals, the brighter the lights shine, the more their flaws are exposed.

This could be a column pointing out that Ned Yost torpedoed a game with a brain-dead pitching change on Friday, the kind of failed leadership the Royals just can’t afford. This could be a column pointing out that Dayton Moore has had more time in charge of the Royals than the constitution allows presidents in the White House, all without a postseason while the team that just passed them in the standings is on its second successful rebuild in that time.

This could be a column pointing out that it’s always about the players, good or bad, and too many of them are content and pampered and have been celebrated beyond their achievements.

Actually, each of those three specific columns may be written very soon. But right now, really, this is on all of them.

The Royals are dropping an opportunity eight years in the making with a combination of weak hitting, bad decisions and an inability to justify the trouble. They seem to wait until the stakes are just high enough to let you down.

They are the worst kind of hometown team: too slow in developing, too quick to claim victory, not good enough to be more than hope and not bad enough to completely forget.

Because, sure. The Royals could turn the season. They could win 10 in a row the way they did last month or they could win 17 of 20 the way they did this time last year. Eric Hosmer could keep up this form, Billy Butler could regain his, and there is enough talent on the roster to come up with a realistic way for the Royals to end the longest playoff drought in North American sports.

But to do that, aside from a long list of lucky breaks, the Royals would have to break their habit of charring under the spotlight.

There is no reason to believe they’ll do that. No reason to expect it. Some Royals players and others in the organization are reading these words. You can put these men into one of two groups: those self-aware enough to understand this is all true, and those with enough delusion and arrogance to think it’s not.

This team should be better. By now, this should be a winner, not a team trying to win. Three years ago, in 2011, the joke among scouts in spring training was that the best team anyone saw was the 2014 Royals. The coming success was so locked that a Back to the Future-style article in Sports Illustrated talked about the playoffs in 2013 and the world championship in 2015.

The 2014 Royals are now seven games behind the Tigers, 3 1/2 behind the Mariners for the second wild card, and, barring a break from character, 65 games from becoming the first franchise in more than 20 years to not make the playoffs within four seasons of being chosen baseball’s best farm system by Baseball America.

It is impossible to single out one problem for all of this, of course. The slow development of top-shelf prospects like Mike Moustakas and Hosmer get most of the attention. Christian Colon over Chris Sale still keeps some in the organization up at night. Danny Duffy and Yordano Ventura are the first smell of good homegrown starting pitchers. We could go on.

But they are also developing quite the reputation for an inability to perform under any modicum of expectation. They are too often at their worst when it matters most.

They have baseball’s worst record in one-run games despite a lockdown bullpen, and — whether it’s the season opener, gagging in front of big home crowds, the 9-17 nosedive since the 10-game win streak, losing three of four to the Tigers going into the break or being swept out of Boston out of the break — seem to find the precise wrong moment to go soft.

On Sunday, the Royals hit one more low. Alex Gordon said the players needed to look in the mirror. Yost called a closed-door meeting. The Royals have fired the hitting coach, juggled the lineup, demoted a should-be slugger and heard the manager admit that the players need to grow up.

It’s all led here, to a team that wipes out good streaks with bad, and good pitching with weak hitting. They have scored one more run than they’ve allowed, and lost one more game than they’ve won. They are, in other words, a near-perfect picture of mediocrity.

Actually, so far, they’ve shown mediocrity is where they’re most comfortable.
Here ya go boss

Kidd Lex 07-21-2014 06:32 AM

Best article Sam has ever scribed.

KCUnited 07-21-2014 06:50 AM

If we hadn't of had that 9-17 stretch, our record would've been good enough for a wildcard spot. /March 2015

ChiTown 07-21-2014 07:22 AM

They lose this series with the Pale Hose and we are done. I don't give a **** how many games back we are of the last WC spot, this Team will fold and go away until they are 8-10 back of the WC SPOT. Then, they will make a mad dash in the last 30 days of the season just to finish slightly above .500

Rinse, repeat, stuck in neutral, slit your wrist, full of hope in the Spring of '15. FML

Archie F. Swin 07-21-2014 07:36 AM

"For these Royals, the brighter the lights shine, the more their flaws are exposed." canon scripture

Archie F. Swin 07-21-2014 07:40 AM

"The 2014 Royals are now seven games behind the Tigers, 3 1/2 behind the Mariners for the second wild card, and, barring a break from character, 65 games from becoming the first franchise in more than 20 years to not make the playoffs within four seasons of being chosen baseball’s best farm system by Baseball America." :deevee:

Canofbier 07-21-2014 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser (Post 10756359)
Oh, you bet. These guys are going to turn it on any day now.

http://confoundedinterest.files.word...bezm.gif?w=585

I'm a few pages late, but I just wanted to say that this is a great gif.

duncan_idaho 07-21-2014 07:49 AM

If an entire team is made up of home-grown players, with most of them being high school draftees or international signings, and they can't handle pressure, that isn't just about the players.

That's another strike against the development process that's in place.

There's an air of satisfaction with mediocrity, a participation medal feel, around this front office (that's what happens when you're two games under .500, wildly inconsistent and up-and-down, atrocious in one of the big areas of the game, and let it leak that you don't understand why you're not selling out every night).

That filters down to everybody. You just don't get a feel that there's a demand for excellence.

The stuff about BA and best farm system is just terribly damning. That goes to player development in the minors and at the major league level, too.

ChiTown 07-21-2014 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 10756696)
That's not homerism or optimism. It's 3.5 games. That's one good week of baseball. They had a hot week or two about a month ago and were in 1st place. If someone gives you a Samardzija type deal maybe you listen about Shields. I'm not sure that'll happen though. Trading Gordon or Hosmer or anyone else is crazy. It's basically throwing in the towel during a 4-5 football season when you're one game out of a WC spot.

Last year after 97 games this team was 5 games under, and 9 games out of a WC spot. This year they're 3.5 and there are less teams to hop... Toronto's come back to earth, the Yankees are missing two of their best pitchers, we still have several games against Cleveland and Seattle has to battle Oakland/Anaheim. Dayton should be out there trying to wheel and deal for help to overtake these teams. His job should depend on it.

I hear what you are saying, but there is NO EVIDENCE to support that he is capable of getting this done. NONE!

You can't be this wildly inconsistent as a team, and expect that the other Teams around you are going to continue to keep you in the game. Those other franchises have actually won something in the last couple of decades, and know how to make deals to get better in the 2nd half of the season. The "Be Royals" and Dayton Moore..................yeah. Not so much.

Archie F. Swin 07-21-2014 08:28 AM

http://www.pinetarpress.com/royals-s...probably-wont/
Royals Should Sell, But History Means They Probably Won't
DB Lesky

After the fears of many have been realized, the Kansas City Royals are now in the home stretch of July and under the .500 mark. This may seem familiar. Just last year the Royals didn’t reach the .500 mark to stay until they beat the White Sox to win their sixth straight and got to 51-51. They’d fall back to exactly .500 once more before finishing the season on a strong note and getting to 86-76. At that time, the season was trumpeted by the organization as a success. You may recall Dayton Moore’s probably regrettable quote about the World Series. So that brings us to today, in the midst of the most anticipated Royals season since 2004, and the team is floundering. It seems like so long ago that the Royals were 39-32 and in charge of the AL Central with a 1.5 game lead. That’s vanished. They’ve even lost their hold on second place in the division.

So now, they should sell.

I’m a firm believer that if a team doesn’t have a real shot at the playoffs that they should always be trading parts that can allow them to receive help for future seasons. How many players I’d trade really depends on the team and the season. The Rangers, for example, are pretty clearly losing because I’m pretty sure their entire roster has spent time on the disabled list. With better health hoped for and assumed in 2015, the Rangers should probably hang on to some of their key guys. Maybe Elvis Andrus could fetch something on the open market, but he can be a key contributor to a good Rangers team next year, so why trade him just to trade him? At the same time, Adrian Beltre might be a good fit to be traded because the Rangers have Joey Gallo on the way, so they could boost their 2015 team with the return for Beltre and hopefully not lose anything at third base next year with the young guy coming up.

With a team like the Cubs, trading Jeff Samardzija was probably the right move. They’re on the cusp of being good, but not right there, so trading a guy who would probably be gone after next season anyway is smart. If the Cubs felt they could win next year, then I think it would be harder to trade Samardzija. The Rays might believe they can contend next year. If that’s the case, they’re not likely to receive anyone in return for David Price who can better help them to that goal, so maybe they hold on to him.

You can see that it’s not so easy to make these decisions. The Royals are kind of no-man’s land right now because they are sort of in striking distance of the second wild card with a fair amount of time left to go this season. This is where the history of the franchise gets in the way of the future of the franchise. If the Royals were an organization that had a couple playoff runs here and there and weren’t gunning for their third .500+ season since the strike, things would be very different. The Royals would look at their current roster and see a lot of potential for this team next season with the right moves being made. The front office wouldn’t feel the weight of their first eight years in control along with the weight of the 21 years prior to that. If we’re being honest, anything that happened before 2014 from a franchise perspective should be irrelevant. If we’re being logical, though, we know that’s not the way things work.

Now the Royals are in a situation that they don’t really know what they should do. If you watch this team, it’s pretty apparent that they’re mediocre. No, they aren’t as bad as they’ve shown at times, and they’re not nearly as good as they showed during their winning streak that vaulted them into first place. They’re probably a team destined to win somewhere between 78 and 86 games. A team without the last quarter century plus of losing might look at that record and see that it’s not good enough to really get anywhere and realize that the difference between 72 wins and 86 wins is nothing if it means no playoffs. A team like the Royals, though, sees value in 86 wins over 72 wins because even a .500 record is so hard to come by. That’s a big reason why you’re not going to see a Royals team near .500 and relatively close to a potential playoff spot in July selling off pieces. If it gets really bad, then maybe the conversation changes.

A related reason is the failure of this regime to get to the playoffs in nearly a decade on the job. When the Royals traded for James Shields and Wade Davis, a pretty clear message was sent that the Royals were expecting to make the playoffs in 2013 and/or 2014. I think there are ancillary benefits of respectability that a lot of people just don’t want to hear, but you don’t trade one of the best offensive prospects your system has seen for two years of a legitimately good starting pitcher unless you expect to make the playoffs with that guy. You don’t trade a potential stalwart in the outfield to have two .500+ seasons. Some can argue that, but they’d be wrong. So yeah, this season means a lot to this front office.

And that’s why they’re probably not going to do what they probably should do and trade James Shields to a team desperate for starting pitchers. That’s why they’re probably not going to pick one of Davis or Holland and trade them now. That’s why they’re probably not going to even seriously consider trading a guy like Eric Hosmer or Lorenzo Cain or, gasp, Alex Gordon. Instead, they’re likely going to stand pat or maybe even add some pieces to make a run as the 2014 season begins to wind down. This team could potentially even make a run if they add the right pieces. A right-handed bat who can hit some homers would be huge in this lineup. Bolstering the bullpen would be really helpful to aid a very good starting rotation. And this team could make a bit of a run and they could get to that 86 or 87 win mark. The problem is that I don’t think that’s even going to be enough to make the playoffs. Why sell the farm to miss the playoffs by three games?

I’ve been an advocate of buying for the Royals, but my advocacy stems from the fact that I just don’t see the Royals doing the opposite. Realistically, they should probably sell and try to re-tool for next season. They have two guys in their rotation in Yordano Ventura and Danny Duffy who have shown that they may be able to headline a rotation. There’s potential for 2015. If the last 29 years of Royals hadn’t been such an abject failure, the organization might be able to look to that year and tell the fans that they’ll try again next year with a stronger team, with holes from this year’s team fixed and strengths made stronger.

With all the flack we deservedly give this organization, it’s easy to forget that they know exactly what’s going on with team. They know the problems. Still, they see a team with a lot of potential and often focus on what they can do rather than what they have done. When you look at the entirety of what this team has done, it’s just hard to see a way this team makes the playoffs. Becuase of that simple point, I would sell. Unfortunately, Dayton Moore and company know the history of both this organization and their regime and feel they just can’t do that. And unfortunately, that has a chance to lead to the organization missing an opportunity to strengthen the next few years for the glory of not being mathematically eliminated until late in September again.

gblowfish 07-21-2014 08:37 AM

I've been saying these guys are pants wetters forever. Any time we draw a big crowd at home, they play like shit. But if it's Tuesday night in September and 10,000 (barely) people show up, they play like world beaters.

Glass won't do anything to change anything. This team was "better" this year, which means they waited until July to implode instead of May. Next year will be 30 years even of futility. They should put a shoulder patch on the uniform to commemorate the achievement.

Even if Glass did whack GMDM, the next contestant would stand up at the press conference and announce "I have a plan, but the fans need to be patient. Give me five years...."

Uuuuuugh.....

We are the American League Version of the Chicago Cubs.

ChiTown 07-21-2014 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 10757436)
I've been saying these guys are pants wetters forever. Any time we draw a big crowd at home, they play like shit. But if it's Tuesday night in September and 10,000 (barely) people show up, they play like world beaters.

Glass won't do anything to change anything. This team was "better" this year, which means they waited until July to implode instead of May. Next year will be 30 years even of futility. They should put a shoulder patch on the uniform to commemorate the achievement.

Even if Glass did whack GMDM, the next contestant would stand up at the press conference and announce "I have a plan, but the fans need to be patient. Give me five years...."

Uuuuuugh.....

We are the American League Version of the Chicago Cubs.

WRONG!

The Cubbies have actually been to the Playoffs 5 times since we last went. We are in a league of our own.

gblowfish 07-21-2014 08:43 AM

We're better at being the Cubs than the Cubs!

Nzoner 07-21-2014 08:48 AM

Quote:

This could be a column pointing out that Ned Yost torpedoed a game with a brain-dead pitching change on Friday, the kind of failed leadership the Royals just can’t afford. This could be a column pointing out that Dayton Moore has had more time in charge of the Royals than the constitution allows presidents in the White House, all without a postseason while the team that just passed them in the standings is on its second successful rebuild in that time.
Once again I'll bring the argument that a good manager can make a big difference.

Hootie 07-21-2014 10:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 10757450)
We're better at being the Cubs than the Cubs!

Hate to say this, because it sounds very Royal-ish...

but the Cubs and the Astros are the two teams who are set up to be damn good in 2017.

I know we all thought that about the Royals 3 years ago so...yeah. Anything can happen I suppose.

Dayton should sell. He should sell Shields and Holland for sure. And then he should get the boot and we, once a-freaking-gain, should start over.

Hire some stats geek from the A's or the 'Stros and go from there.

TambaBerry 07-21-2014 10:27 AM

Please Glass sell the team to the cerner group. I'm tired of this no accountability. From the owner to guys like Moore and yost.

C3HIEF3S 07-21-2014 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dingleberry (Post 10757619)
Please Glass sell the team to the cerner group. I'm tired of this no accountability. From the owner to guys like Moore and yost.

Glass has zero reasons to sell the team.

Hootie 07-21-2014 10:32 AM

I'm not seeing why, currently, David Glass is an issue. We spent plenty of money this year. We've spent more money than the Pirates and the A's to name a few...a lot more money than those two teams actually.

So yeah. He's clearly not a great or attentive owner...but the failure has to be on Dayton at this point. If we want to blame Glass for Dayton's failure I suppose that's acceptable.

Jerm 07-21-2014 10:35 AM

Save Our KC Royals fixin to start flying banners according to their FB...

TLO 07-21-2014 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 10757627)
I'm not seeing why, currently, David Glass is an issue. We spent plenty of money this year. We've spent more money than the Pirates and the A's to name a few...a lot more money than those two teams actually.

So yeah. He's clearly not a great or attentive owner...but the failure has to be on Dayton at this point. If we want to blame Glass for Dayton's failure I suppose that's acceptable.

I wonder how much time Dayton has left?

Fansy the Famous Bard 07-21-2014 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C3HIEF3S (Post 10757623)
Glass has zero reasons to sell the team.

dingleberry asking isn't enough?

Pasta Little Brioni 07-21-2014 11:02 AM

He'd have to put them on Rollback first

ChiTown 07-21-2014 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big Smoke (Post 10757631)
I wonder how much time Dayton has left?

About 2.5 months...........

duncan_idaho 07-21-2014 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C3HIEF3S (Post 10757623)
Glass has zero reasons to sell the team.

Yeah he does. Rich people understand that $600 million, cash, now is better than making, say, $30-50 million a year. Because of what you can do with that huge amount of cash and how much money you can use it to create.

I don't know that Glass is the real problem (he's given Dayton Moore more resources than a LOT of teams that have been more successful), but having a group of owners with hugely deep pockets (probably 3-4x Glass's personal fortune) who have extremely high expectations and know how to run a first-rate, model organization would be an upgrade.

ChiTown 07-21-2014 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10757702)
Yeah he does. Rich people understand that $600 million, cash, now is better than making, say, $30-50 million a year. Because of what you can do with that huge amount of cash and how much money you can use it to create.

I don't know that Glass is the real problem (he's given Dayton Moore more resources than a LOT of teams that have been more successful), but having a group of owners with hugely deep pockets (probably 3-4x Glass's personal fortune) who have extremely high expectations and know how to run a first-rate, model organization would be an upgrade.

B-I-N-G-O!

ChiefsCountry 07-21-2014 11:27 AM

No doubt that the Cerner guys have more money and they have kicked ass with Sporting, just remember that Sporting's salary for the entire team is similar to what the Royals pay Hosmer.

gblowfish 07-21-2014 11:30 AM

Marty McDonald is trying to raise money to fly banners over Kauffman. If you want to help, you can donate here:

http://www.gofundme.com/bvwqfc

ChiTown 07-21-2014 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 10757753)
No doubt that the Cerner guys have more money and they have kicked ass with Sporting, just remember that Sporting's salary for the entire team is similar to what the Royals pay Hosmer.

Relevance?

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 11:33 AM

I think this effort is jumping the shark.

It was brilliant with the Chiefs because Pioli was a one who sucks the penis, in addition to being a terrible GM. Dayton Moore, by all accounts, is actually a decent dude; he's just ****ing bad at his job.

Big difference.

ChiefsCountry 07-21-2014 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 10757759)
Relevance?

4 million to a billionaire is easier to piss away than 100 million plus on a payroll is my point.

doomy3 07-21-2014 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10757763)
I think this effort is jumping the shark.

It was brilliant with the Chiefs because Pioli was a one who sucks the penis, in addition to being a terrible GM. Dayton Moore, by all accounts, is actually a decent dude; he's just ****ing bad at his job.

Big difference.

Yep. I don't like this one.

Hootie 07-21-2014 11:37 AM

Fly banners over Kaufmann? Really? Sounds like a dumb idea. It's not like they Pioli'd the place and didn't try...Moore just happened to be inept when it came to developing players.

If I had MILLIONS of expendable income...I would not donate a dime to that abysmal idea of flying banners over The K. IMO, dumb and tacky.

It totally made sense to black out Arrowhead and get the scumbag dickhole of a person Pioli out of town. Moore? Let him get fired and move on with it. It's not like he Pioli'd us and told us all to go **** ourselves.

Hootie 07-21-2014 11:39 AM

Marty is a super good dude...but this just seems like an attention whore kind of thing. Trust me, I know attention whoring when I see it.

ChiefsCountry 07-21-2014 11:40 AM

Count me in not a fan with banners for the Royals.

RealSNR 07-21-2014 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 10757756)
Marty McDonald is trying to raise money to fly banners over Kauffman. If you want to help, you can donate here:

http://www.gofundme.com/bvwqfc

Unless it's an effort to get a recording of David Glass saying something racist, I wouldn't fund that shit.

gblowfish 07-21-2014 11:40 AM

1 Attachment(s)
Pony up.
Demand better.

SAUTO 07-21-2014 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10757763)
I think this effort is jumping the shark.

It was brilliant with the Chiefs because Pioli was a one who sucks the penis, in addition to being a terrible GM. Dayton Moore, by all accounts, is actually a decent dude; he's just ****ing bad at his job.

Big difference.

exactly

gblowfish 07-21-2014 11:44 AM

Trying to get you guys to stand up for something around here is like debating with the Judean Peoples Front.

https://www.facebook.com/JudeanPeoplesFront

Hootie 07-21-2014 11:46 AM

I'll gladly fly a banner if it reads, "**** you Moose and Butler. And you better have a 1.000 OPS this month Hosmer or **** you, too. Hi Alex!!!"

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 11:47 AM

Really hope he rethinks this thing because I think it would allow for revisionist history to cheapen the brilliant public castrating of Pioli's worthless ass.

Pioli deserved to be publicly humiliated. Moore does not; he simply needs to be fired.

SAUTO 07-21-2014 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10757804)
Really hope he rethinks this thing because I think it would allow for revisionist history to cheapen the brilliant public castrating of Pioli's worthless ass.

Pioli deserved to be publicly humiliated. Moore does not; he simply needs to be fired.

agreed

noa 07-21-2014 11:50 AM

I donated to the Chiefs banner but won't donate to this. Not the same situation, and I don't want us fans to overplay our hand. The save our chiefs model should be used judiciously.
Posted via Mobile Device

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 11:51 AM

Biggest problem is that we're going to waste an opportunity to improve in the next 10 days.

We should be trading Shields and Holland, but Moore won't do this because it would be an admission that he's failed on a number of different levels, thus cementing his firing.

Hootie 07-21-2014 11:55 AM

100% right. Shields and Holland should be packaged together forrrrrr!!!!

OSCAR TAVERAS.

DO IT.

DO IT NOW.

Hootie 07-21-2014 11:57 AM

(although I'm not sure the Cardinals would do this...even though I think it's totally fair for both teams.)

Discuss Thrower 07-21-2014 11:57 AM

Ownership is the largest problem with the Royals.

ChiefsCountry 07-21-2014 11:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 10757828)
100% right. Shields and Holland should be packaged together forrrrrr!!!!

OSCAR TAVERAS.

DO IT.

DO IT NOW.

:rolleyes:
Cardinals fans have sucked his cock way too much.

gblowfish 07-21-2014 12:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noa (Post 10757816)
I donated to the Chiefs banner but won't donate to this. Not the same situation, and I don't want us fans to overplay our hand. The save our chiefs model should be used judiciously.
Posted via Mobile Device

Over-playing the hand depends on the nature of the message.

I think 29 years of futility deserves some kind of fan response, and a .500 baseball team is NOT progress based on eight or nine years of management.

If you're happy with the way things are now, and what you have as a team, then you have no idea what winning baseball is all about or what it's like to be in a real dogfight for a division.

Mediocrity shouldn't be rewarded, but that's the new reality in this participation-ribbon filled world. Give everybody a trophy, and for God's Sake, don't hurt anybody's self esteem.

teedubya 07-21-2014 12:01 PM

We tried the Save Our KC Royals last year... and the day that we went live, they hired George Brett. Heh.

Three7s 07-21-2014 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 10757828)
100% right. Shields and Holland should be packaged together forrrrrr!!!!

OSCAR TAVERAS.

DO IT.

DO IT NOW.

Or package in a prospect with those two for Stanton? :hmmm:

gblowfish 07-21-2014 12:04 PM

If Marty can raise enough money to fly the banner, the Royals will raise ticket prices the night of the first fly over, because it's an "event" and tickets are subject to dynamic variable pricing. I hope they do it on "Salute the A's" night.

I hate that promotion with the intensity of a thousand burning suns.

Wednesday, August 13th is "A's Poster Night." Get a poster of the team that abandoned Kansas City to go to Oakland, California, then win six AL Pennants and Four World Series.

We salute them because they know how to win, and we don't.

Ya-hoo.

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Three7s (Post 10757858)
Or package in a prospect with those two for Stanton? :hmmm:

DM wouldn't even finish his sentence before the Marlins' FO would hang up the phone.

Sure would like to know what, arguably, the best reliever in baseball + a legit #3 starter would bring from a contender, though...

duncan_idaho 07-21-2014 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 10757753)
No doubt that the Cerner guys have more money and they have kicked ass with Sporting, just remember that Sporting's salary for the entire team is similar to what the Royals pay Hosmer.

Their combined net worth is something like $6-7 billion dollars, minimum (Illig and Patterson are $6 billion combined, and the other guys have to be bringing SOMETHING to the table). Most of Glass's net worth is tied up in the Royals franchise (I think he's about $700 million, with $500 million of that being the Royals).

The salary is restricted by the league, but those guys have spent considerably more than their peers on everything around the team (and really understand how to create fan experience - SEC football teams are consulting with them to pick up pointers on that).

They also made big personal investments in a soccer-only stadium and complex because they understand you have to spend it to make it.

KCUnited 07-21-2014 12:19 PM

Can't get behind flying the banners. Paying someone to divert the team plane over Ukraine though...

Hootie 07-21-2014 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Three7s (Post 10757858)
Or package in a prospect with those two for Stanton? :hmmm:

Well unfortunately Miami doesn't work because they aren't buyers...so they have absolutely no use for Shields and Holland is going to start getting really expensive.

The reason the Cards work because they are legitimately WS contenders and need a starter and MOST DEFINITELY need Greg Holland.

Marty Mac Ver 2.0 07-21-2014 12:32 PM

Hootie, not seeking any limelight...and I certainly don't have the time to do this or give this like SOC.

However, the amount of requests I get to start this movement, re-start it, etc... I've long ignored for a year. This weekend's series? I figured the best thing do is to create the portal for people to donate to. If the fans don't donate enough, guess what? No banners.

Reality is the Royals haven't been to the post-season since 1985. This year's squad is just too talented to play with the volume of ups-and-downs they have. If the fans truly want a SOR movement, they'll contribute. Otherwise, this thing goes away.

Let this be a wake up call to the club.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 10757778)
Marty is a super good dude...but this just seems like an attention whore kind of thing. Trust me, I know attention whoring when I see it.


ChiTown 07-21-2014 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10757915)
Their combined net worth is something like $6-7 billion dollars, minimum (Illig and Patterson are $6 billion combined, and the other guys have to be bringing SOMETHING to the table). Most of Glass's net worth is tied up in the Royals franchise (I think he's about $700 million, with $500 million of that being the Royals).

The salary is restricted by the league, but those guys have spent considerably more than their peers on everything around the team (and really understand how to create fan experience - SEC football teams are consulting with them to pick up pointers on that).

They also made big personal investments in a soccer-only stadium and complex because they understand you have to spend it to make it.

Thank you for that response. Perfect

ChiefsCountry 07-21-2014 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 10757915)
Their combined net worth is something like $6-7 billion dollars, minimum (Illig and Patterson are $6 billion combined, and the other guys have to be bringing SOMETHING to the table). Most of Glass's net worth is tied up in the Royals franchise (I think he's about $700 million, with $500 million of that being the Royals).

The salary is restricted by the league, but those guys have spent considerably more than their peers on everything around the team (and really understand how to create fan experience - SEC football teams are consulting with them to pick up pointers on that).

They also made big personal investments in a soccer-only stadium and complex because they understand you have to spend it to make it.

I have no problem with the Cerner Group buying the Royals at all, they would be the best for it. MLB is just a whole different beast than MLS is.

ChiTown 07-21-2014 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 10757985)
I have no problem with the Cerner Group buying the Royals at all, they would be the best for it. MLB is just a whole different beast than MLS is.

The point is that they are more than financially capable of stepping up, and they have shown that they are a VERY progressive ownership group.

Do it!

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 10757928)
Well unfortunately Miami doesn't work because they aren't buyers...so they have absolutely no use for Shields and Holland is going to start getting really expensive.

The reason the Cards work because they are legitimately WS contenders and need a starter and MOST DEFINITELY need Greg Holland.

Davis is owed $7M next year, which is an asinine amount for a set-up guy. Perfectly reasonable for a good closer, though.

Ironically, moving Davis to the closer role and potentially getting an elite prospect for Shields and Holland would offer a way for the Royals to still win "The Trade" in a way that I don't think anyone envisioned.

ChiTown 07-21-2014 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marty Mac Ver 2.0 (Post 10757956)
Hootie, not seeking any limelight...and I certainly don't have the time to do this or give this like SOC.

However, the amount of requests I get to start this movement, re-start it, etc... I've long ignored for a year. This weekend's series? I figured the best thing do is to create the portal for people to donate to. If the fans don't donate enough, guess what? No banners.

Reality is the Royals haven't been to the post-season since 1985. This year's squad is just too talented to play with the volume of ups-and-downs they have. If the fans truly want a SOR movement, they'll contribute. Otherwise, this thing goes away.

Let this be a wake up call to the club.

I love you Marty, but this is a bad proposition. The Chiefs play once a week to large viewing audiences. The Royals play 5-6 times per week in front of a small viewership. Apples and Buick's. The effect will hit ESPN and local channels as a small also ran blurb and have no effect. And, to repeat what Deez stated, Pioli deserved every shot he got from the fans and more. Dayton isn't a bad guy, he just sucks as a GM.

Unsmooth-Moment 07-21-2014 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 10758002)
Davis is owed $7M next year, which is an asinine amount for a set-up guy. Perfectly reasonable for a good closer, though.

Ironically, moving Davis to the closer role and potentially getting an elite prospect for Shields and Holland would offer a way for the Royals to still win "The Trade" in a way that I don't think anyone envisioned.

I certainly think the Royals should be at least keeping the option open. Trading Shields/Holland now could benefit the team and make this do or die season less die next season.

Hootie 07-21-2014 01:05 PM

That's why I'm all for trading Holland. And honestly, Wade Davis' reliever stuff is even filthier than Holland's and I didn't even think that was possible (Sans Kimbrel).

Davis is a steal in the closer's role for his two team option years...Holland will be more expensive.

Some contender would overpay for a Shields/Holland combo...and honestly speaking...if our bats get hot it still wouldn't necessarily cripple our run for that last wild card spot.

Sure-Oz 07-21-2014 01:28 PM

I'll be thrilled when gmdm I'd fired. Problem is glass doesn't seem to be in a rush

petegz28 07-21-2014 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 10758078)
I'll be thrilled when gmdm I'd fired. Problem is glass doesn't seem to be in a rush

If he is fired it won't be until after the season. While GMDM has made some bade decisions, he has also made some good ones. This team is perfectly capable of performing at a higher level than they are. I think most of the problem is the way they are allowed to be managed or not managed, if you will.

GloryDayz 07-21-2014 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noa (Post 10757816)
I donated to the Chiefs banner but won't donate to this. Not the same situation, and I don't want us fans to overplay our hand. The save our chiefs model should be used judiciously.
Posted via Mobile Device

I can't disagree to a point, but it might be the only way, and it's not like we would ever use the tactic on, let's say, Sporting KC.

But your point is not lost, I just think we're at the point were perhaps in September that this nuclear option needs to be performed.

GloryDayz 07-21-2014 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 10757838)
Ownership is the largest problem with the Royals.

This....

Hootie 07-21-2014 02:08 PM

we could hire Sparky Anderson or Tommy LaSorda and Pete would blame management...

of course, Cardinals fans do the same ****ing thing. They go to the NLCS or WS every year and they want to fire their manager every season

gblowfish 07-21-2014 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 10758228)
we could hire Sparky Anderson

I'd ask Wilt Chamberlain for advice about that, Hootster....

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 02:23 PM

Yep. Completely convinced that moving Shields/Holland/+ prospects (because it will take a prospect or two to complete the deal) for a Taveras is definitively the right thing to do, not only for the future but for this year, too.

Must get a legit bat.

Hootie 07-21-2014 02:24 PM

Jon Heyman of CBS Sports reports that the Royals are considering a trade for outfielder Alex Rios.
Kansas City's offense ranks second-to-last in the American League in OPS and Rios could provide a boost. The 33-year-old is hitting .302/.330/.435 with four home runs and 16 stolen bases in 96 games this season for the Rangers, who are paying him $12.5 million in 2014 and hold a $13.5 million club option on him for 2015.

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 02:28 PM

See, DM is going to do something ****ing stupid like this and then I'm going to be back here advocating for the plane to get in the air immediately.

Fansy the Famous Bard 07-21-2014 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 10758276)
Jon Heyman of CBS Sports reports that the Royals are considering a trade for outfielder Alex Rios.
Kansas City's offense ranks second-to-last in the American League in OPS and Rios could provide a boost. The 33-year-old is hitting .302/.330/.435 with four home runs and 16 stolen bases in 96 games this season for the Rangers, who are paying him $12.5 million in 2014 and hold a $13.5 million club option on him for 2015.

Alex Rios' numbers are basically identical to Lorenzo Cain. The differences are Cain actually plays defense, and doesn't come with a 12+ mil pricetag.

Sounds like a Royals thing to do, expect it to happen.

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 02:36 PM

I wouldn't trade a bag of dicks for any name the Royals are rumored to be considering based on the information in that link.

**** it. Fly the ****ing plane.

DM, why do you force me to ****ing hate you so much?

SAUTO 07-21-2014 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie 2.0 (Post 10758276)
Jon Heyman of CBS Sports reports that the Royals are considering a trade for outfielder Alex Rios.
Kansas City's offense ranks second-to-last in the American League in OPS and Rios could provide a boost. The 33-year-old is hitting .302/.330/.435 with four home runs and 16 stolen bases in 96 games this season for the Rangers, who are paying him $12.5 million in 2014 and hold a $13.5 million club option on him for 2015.

did I say the plane was a silly idea?

maybe I should rethink my position...

DeezNutz 07-21-2014 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 10758320)
did I say the plane was a silly idea?

maybe I should rethink my position...

Yep. He's going to pull the Yuni equivalent of an outfield acquisition, and I'm going to lose my ****ing mind.

ChiefsCountry 07-21-2014 02:51 PM

Royals are looking for a bat which they need yet fans are bitching about that.

gblowfish 07-21-2014 02:51 PM

If they get this guy they either have to bench Aoki or Butler. Wasn't Rios with the White Sox before Texas?

ChiefsCountry 07-21-2014 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gblowfish (Post 10758350)
If they get this guy they either have to bench Aoki or Butler. Wasn't Rios with the White Sox before Texas?

Yes he was with the Sox. Royals looked at him before the Sox traded him to Texas. Aoki would probably be DFA then.

duncan_idaho 07-21-2014 02:55 PM

Rios would help.

Rios would have helped a lot more if they had made the move for him a month ago.

Not sure there's enough time left to make up for how effing awful the offense has been outside of the 3 week spurt directly after Grifol's canning.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.