![]() |
Anybody remember Jeff Linkenbach?
Yeah, that’s who Caliendo reminds me of |
Everybody that wants to draft a LT in this draft needs to understand that you're basically going to be drafting...Kingsley Sumaitia. You want to give up multiple picks to do that? And said player will either not play in year one or not play well in year one. Period. Any other result is EXTREMELY unlikely.
So all of you guys that think Kingsley is 'trash' and a 'wasted pick' and that we just need to get the 'right guy' should forget about that. We're not getting into the top 15, and if we did that in THIS draft, we're probably STILL not getting a ready to go starting LT. So we'll have a THIRD project OT. I don't know about YOU, but I think trying to develop THREE is maybe not the best plan. And for the opportunity to draft ANOTHER project OT, we will give up the opportunity to draft immediate upgrade level talents at DT, DE, CB, or RB. That's where the talent in this draft can fall to us. SO, I don't think it's smart to give up on Kingsley, and I don't think he's a guard long-term. But I don't think you can just hand it to him and hope for the best this year either. Get a stop-gap or pay Jackson in which case, you groom Kingsley for RT in '26 when you can cut Taylor. Morris looks like a G to me, always has. He'd probably be a really good one. but that's all just my opinion. |
Quote:
If they're able to sign Jackson then that's great, but that's a big IF. If he's not available or signs elsewhere? As I stated before, KC struck out so to speak with Moore and to a lesser degree with Hardman. Where was the clamor that we had already drafted enough project WRs and needed to go the FA route? They kept throwing numbers at the position until it started to work out. FA WRs who are any good are expensive, so are OTs. You can't necessarily just buy your way out of this mess at OT unless you get lucky and Jackson becomes available at the right price. With the caveat that I'm not suggesting a huge reach and forcing an OT if it simply doesn't work out, at the end of the day it's a vastly more important position to this team than DE, DE, CB, LB, etc. If the defense falls off then so be it. If we **** up again at LT and the offense continues to suffer and/or Mahomes gets injured or irreparably damaged (either physically or mentally) then this team's future is ****ed. We can get by in the short term with a drop off in talent on defense. They already went all-in on defense in 2022 and have allowed the talent on offense to fall off, even if the strength of this draft is in positions like DL I don't see how you don't find a way to heavily address the offense, namely OL and RB. |
Quote:
So unless the staff is out on Kingsley I wouldn't add more questions to the mix. But again, we don't know what they'll do. |
and I'm absolutely FOR addressing offense, especially LT and RB.
I just wouldn't go out of my way to draft another LT project. Sign one in FA, or sign a stop-gap vet and develop the guys you're already working on and move Kingsley to RT for '26. Use the strength of the draft. Draft DL and RB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
What if Kingsley was meant to be Trey Smith's replacement all along?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Which worked out about as well as mixing bleach with ammonia, as it turns out. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.