ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs trade Tyreek Hill to the Dolphins (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343099)

-King- 03-23-2022 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16209259)
Yes, just as Veach drew it up the entire time! Wait until most FAs that we could've gone after sign and THEN make our move.

staylor, I'm sorry for calling you a homer with people like this in existence. You seem like Red Dawg in comparison.

LMAO LMAO LMAO

JPH83 03-23-2022 12:53 PM

Horrible. This off-season is...not going how I expected.

staylor26 03-23-2022 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 16209283)
Don’t worry guys Corey Coleman got this!

Yea because that’s the plan!

****ing moron.

DRM08 03-23-2022 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 16209242)
After the Seahawks 2 Super Bowls they needed to reload. They had a lot of picks but were terrible and that ended up with their QB wanting out.

Veach has 2 roads he can go down. John Schneiders where we draft poorly and Patrick eventually wants out

Or

Reload this team by drafting well and having a lot of money to load up on deep playoff runs


OL is a critical element to keep the QB happy. Veach has done a good job with that aspect in the last offseason. Hopefully they can keep the solid OL intact moving forward. I would like to see them put together a better defense. Mahomes has never had a really great defense to help him. And when I say never, I mean never. He lost playoff games in high school where he scored 50+ points.

TEX 03-23-2022 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209268)
That takes time, so all this talk (not from you) that this draft solves everything is very misguided.

For all the talk about rebuilding the entire defense, we're essentially in need of the same on offense. We have a 33 year old TE and not a single WR under contract past this season.

If we want a shot at a WC spot this year, we're going to need to use a bit of draft capital to bring in a/some quality young talent at WR.

Otherwise, people need to understand that even if Veach hits on EVERY ONE of these picks, they aren't going to be difference makers (at least at WR) this year, and maybe not next.

Veach has a LOT of work to do, and neither of those options above are "wrong" necessarily - they just impact what our expectations should be for 2022.

Wasted season coming up. Stupid to have traded Tyreek.

Hammock Parties 03-23-2022 12:54 PM

RIP

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FA4SsYTX...jpg&name=large

R8RFAN 03-23-2022 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoopsdoc (Post 16209287)
From an outsiders perspective, this move made a lot of sense.

The key will be using the draft capital to adequately replace Hill.

If they can do that, good trade.

If not, bad trade.

i agree , now tell me who can adequately replace Hill and the problem is solved.

Bwana 03-23-2022 12:55 PM

Hmm? Well I'll hold back my judgement until I see exactly what's lined up on both sides of the ball, the first game of the season. I started looking at football from more of a business angle years ago and I don't get all choked up if a player, even a good player, gets traded. It's just business and we can't always keep every star on the team and expect dollars to pencil out. If Bart can hit some home runs on his draft picks to fill our numerous holes, we will be fine. One thing is for sure, this move is going to make the draft a lot more exciting.

AdolfOliverBush 03-23-2022 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16209276)
LMAO

The Chiefs do not need to rebuild their offense. They need a couple young talented weapons.

That’s not a rebuild.

Yep. Considering Reid isn't going to run the ball more regardless of personnel, WR is the only position of need on offense.

Kiimo 03-23-2022 12:55 PM

I mean trading guys at this point in their career is what long term success looks like.

Good luck with replacing him though. Once in a generation unique talent.

Now I wish Clay really had an insider. DK would be nice

IowaHawkeyeChief 03-23-2022 12:55 PM

The same folks who are pissed we didn't keep Tyreek and pay him $30/yr are the same folks who bitch that we have Sorenson and Niemann as backups. If you want the latter to change, you can't pay the majority of your cap to 5 players...

LiveSteam 03-23-2022 12:56 PM

After all the moves made in the West.
KC shits the bed with Tyreek.

Guess I'll try and find away to Enjoy the sucking , enjoy Mahomes running around throwing picks.

You dnt pull a trick like this with a receiver that stands alone with Jerry Rice and Randy Moss.

Dnt see this as anything but the biggest mistake since KC tried the Patriots Way.

Kiimo 03-23-2022 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16209293)
Yea because that’s the plan!

****ing moron.

Shut the **** up staylor

OnTheWarpath15 03-23-2022 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16209295)
Wasted season coming up.

Maybe, most likely if we rely on the draft.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 16209295)
Stupid to have traded Tyreek.

Nope, had to be done. $30M per for a WR is nonsense.

BryanBusby 03-23-2022 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 16209302)
I mean trading guys at this point in their career is what long term success looks like.

Good luck with replacing him though. Once in a generation unique talent.

Now I wish Clay really had an insider. DK would be nice

Oddly enough, that stupid troll might accidentally predict the DK Metcalf trade.

Baby Lee 03-23-2022 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jallmon (Post 16208875)
Adversely! But we still have Patrick Mahomes, Mecole Hardman, and Travis Kelce to help the younguns along. It will be exciting to watch how our playcalling morphs with the new blood. And with our newly renovated defense, we won't be having to drop 40 points on these ****ing clowns every week.

ROFL ROFL ROFL

Mauling O-Line, and we couldn't get EB/Reid to run the ball with the 'Gals dropping 25 into coverage. And out last best hope for anything other than scrambling and chucking was Reid remembering how well 'Reek ran jet sweeps.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gfyjFmJ6KVs" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/SvNPHPlVDZs?start=165" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

-King- 03-23-2022 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16209289)
I really think that's been veachs play. We aren't desperate to attack the primary market. Let's attack the secondary market. Most teams have outblown their wads. We can do some real damage here. Jujus insanely cheap contract is a good example of that.

If you need to trade your 2nd best player in order to attack the secondary market, you're doing a bad job of managing shit.

I understand that we might not be able to get the big time FAs, but needing to trade Tyreek just so we can sign a bunch of Deon Bush's and what?...Jadeveon Clowney if we're lucky, just makes no sense to me.

RunKC 03-23-2022 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 16209250)
Russ wanted out because Carrol is a dinosaur that wants to run his offense through the RB's.

Not because they couldn't draft.

Yeah he was really happy with their shitty personnel moves LMAO

Quote:

A player known for carefully measuring every word uttered publicly used the occasion of a media conference call to celebrate winning the NFL Man of the Year Award to candidly admit his frustration over being hit as often as he had been during his Seahawks career.
https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/...success/?amp=1

TwistedChief 03-23-2022 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 16209289)
I really think that's been veachs play. We aren't desperate to attack the primary market. Let's attack the secondary market. Most teams have outblown their wads. We can do some real damage here. Jujus insanely cheap contract is a good example of that.

Juju's contract is insanely cheap this year but that money counts against the cap next year. Now we're less in need of that immediate cap relief. We didn't win by getting JuJu on a 1yr 10.75mm deal. We would've won had we gotten him on a 3-year deal with that AAV.

AdolfOliverBush 03-23-2022 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8RFAN (Post 16209298)
i agree , now tell me who can adequately replace Hill and the problem is solved.

No one player can replace him, but a young WR or two and a much improved defense can.

BossChief 03-23-2022 12:58 PM

Crazy that they just restructured Thuney when they had to know this was in the works.

What are they working on that requires all that cap space? We have to have 25m in cap space now

'Hamas' Jenkins 03-23-2022 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209286)
Completely agree. I would have been livid had they given Tyreek what Miami did.

But it sure seems like several folks seem to think these picks are going solve our 2022 problems - and they may on defense - but expecting a WR picked 29+ to make a difference Day One is unrealistic.

You're absolutely right. Sometimes you have to take a step back to take additional steps forward. You can't live off the credit card forever. Eventually, you have to make some investments.

The Franchise 03-23-2022 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16209318)
Juju's contract is insanely cheap this year but that money counts against the cap next year. Now we're less in need of that immediate cap relief. We didn't win by getting JuJu on a 1yr 10.75mm deal. We would've won had we gotten him on a 3-year deal with that AAV.

And Juju probably wasn’t going to sign anything more than one year. He wants to build his value, which he didn’t get to last season, and cash in next year.

FloridaMan88 03-23-2022 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209286)
Completely agree. I would have been livid had they given Tyreek what Miami did.

But it sure seems like several folks seem to think these picks are going solve our 2022 problems - and they may on defense - but expecting a WR picked 29+ to make a difference Day One is unrealistic.

And this is my biggest problem with trading Tyreek.

The Chiefs are taking a significant step back in a season when Mahomes is still in his prime and the rest of the division has gotten significantly better.

You can't gamble on potentially wasting these seasons with Mahomes still in his prime by hoping you can essentially hit the lottery in the draft... which is what the Chiefs are going to have to do... to effectively replace what they are losing with Tyreek Hill.

OnTheWarpath15 03-23-2022 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 16209312)
Oddly enough, that stupid troll might accidentally predict the DK Metcalf trade.

And that's the HOLY SHIT kinda move I'm referencing above. But we're right back in the same position with a WR wanting a metric **** ton of money in 2023.

JPH83 03-23-2022 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209286)
Completely agree. I would have been livid had they given Tyreek what Miami did.

But it sure seems like several folks seem to think these picks are going solve our 2022 problems - and they may on defense - but expecting a WR picked 29+ to make a difference Day One is unrealistic.

I mean this is it. Hill was massively expensive, because he was a unique weapon. There is no-one in this draft or FA that offers what he does. We can get some very good players, and possibly improve our depth across the defence. But we can't replace this in the short-medium term.

It's an offence minded team with a HOF WR. Trading that to develop a marginally better defence is an odd move.

-King- 03-23-2022 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 16209312)
Oddly enough, that stupid troll might accidentally predict the DK Metcalf trade.

So we're going to trade a potential hall of famer because we don't want to pay him to trade for a maybe great player with a bad attitude who's also going to want to be paid by next year?

I guess that would make as much sense as the past 6 months of the chiefs season/off season.

R8RFAN 03-23-2022 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AdolfOliverBush (Post 16209320)
No one player can replace him, but a young WR or two and a much improved defense can.

This move is really going to put a dent in PM's numbers

IowaHawkeyeChief 03-23-2022 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fishels (Post 16209284)
I do. Making a little more a year to lose when you’re already ridiculously wealthy. Some of you guys act like the Chiefs are offering him minimum wage or something. If our drafts aren’t spent amazingly well he basically left Mahomes and Kelce to die on an island

Yea, whatever, if you had a job offer making 30% more, and it was located in a tax free State in a city like Miami you would probably make that decision too. Especially if that decision was approx. $40 million more over 4 years...

The Franchise 03-23-2022 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209327)
And that's the HOLY SHIT kinda move I'm referencing above. But we're right back in the same position with a WR wanting a metric **** ton of money in 2023.

I don’t see DK happening.

I would trade for McLaurin though.

BryanBusby 03-23-2022 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209327)
And that's the HOLY SHIT kinda move I'm referencing above. But we're right back in the same position with a WR wanting a metric **** ton of money in 2023.

The Chiefs were willing to pay Tyreek a ton of money. He just wanted to completely reset the market.

The Chiefs can't do that with every single extension. I think that was the difference.

JohnnyHammersticks 03-23-2022 01:00 PM

Gonna be fun to revisit this thread in a few years and laugh at the people who were knocking this deal. I went from the uneasy feeling that we were on the downward curve side of our run to being totally stoked about the next 5 year window. And I'm as big of a Tyreek fan as anyone. This is a great move, not only for the future, but for this season as well.

Great move Veach!

Congrats on getting paid Tyreek, and thanks for your contributions!

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 03-23-2022 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16209322)
Crazy that they just restructured Thuney when they had to know this was in the works.

What are they working on that requires all that cap space? We have to have 25m in cap space now

Stephon Gilmore!!

staylor26 03-23-2022 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 16209309)
Shut the **** up staylor

Go **** yourself Kiimosabi!

R8RFAN 03-23-2022 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16209336)
Stephon Gilmore!!

Yall got the money now, That's a player we are targeting too, Yall may get him now

IowaHawkeyeChief 03-23-2022 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 16209328)
I mean this is it. Hill was massively expensive, because he was a unique weapon. There is no-one in this draft or FA that offers what he does. We can get some very good players, and possibly improve our depth across the defence. But we can't replace this in the short-medium term.

It's an offence minded team with a HOF WR. Trading that to develop a marginally better defence is an odd move.

Trading for Hill makes sense for the Dolphs because of the Hawaiin...It makes sense for the Chiefs because of Mahomes.

OnTheWarpath15 03-23-2022 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16209326)
And this is my biggest problem with trading Tyreek.

The Chiefs are taking a significant step back in a season when Mahomes is still in his prime and the rest of the division has gotten significantly better.

You can't gamble on potentially wasting these seasons with Mahomes still in his prime by hoping you can essentially hit the lottery in the draft... which is what the Chiefs are going to have to do... to effectively replace what they are losing with Tyreek Hill.

It was going to happen eventually, it's to our advantage to just take our medicine now and be ready to roll in a year or two when all these teams that went nuts start feeling the effects.

oldman 03-23-2022 01:01 PM

I don't remember the exact figures, but it seems to me his cap number was about $21.5M and his signing bonus money was only about $2.5 or 6M. That gives us about $18M relief, right? Plus a load of picks. While I hate to see him go, it's a business on both ends and we're not spending whatever to keep him this year and the next 2 or 3. He gets paid and Miami is probably more his style (especially if Baby Mama doesn't follow him). The other bright spot for us is he gets to cause havoc with the Bills D twice a year.
Bottom lines, thanks Reek for all you did and we wish you well. Second. Enroll Juju in the Berlitz version of Reid's offense.

OnTheWarpath15 03-23-2022 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16209333)
I don’t see DK happening.

I would trade for McLaurin though.

I don't see DK happening either - but without that level of move, 2022 gonna be a rough year.

ChiTown 03-23-2022 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 16209322)
Crazy that they just restructured Thuney when they had to know this was in the works.

What are they working on that requires all that cap space? We have to have 25m in cap space now

DK Tradeo:-)

AdolfOliverBush 03-23-2022 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8RFAN (Post 16209330)
This move is really going to put a dent in PM's numbers

Not unless Reid suddenly decides to utilize a balanced offense for the first time in his career, which would actually be a positive for Mahomes.

Nickhead 03-23-2022 01:04 PM

I ****ing called this move last season. You all laughed at me :D

R8RFAN 03-23-2022 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 16209350)
DK Tradeo:-)

very possible

suzzer99 03-23-2022 01:04 PM

Ok looking at the optimistic side of this now. We got the picks, and $20M more in cap space, which is easy to forget. If we had paid Hill what the Jets did, I'd be happier. But I'd still be nervous about putting all our eggs in that basket. We'd almost be guaranteed having to rebuild in a couple years when Hill declined and all the bills came due.

Also Hill's speed is still all there, but the last couple years he's had steadily more drops. He used to pull down everything in traffic. The huge drop at the beginning of the 49ers SB could have changed the complexion of the game. And last year he almost single-handedly lost us a couple games this year dropping easy passes that went for INTs in huge spots. He signed some endorsement deal for gloves last year that a lot of people thought contributed to it.

So he might already be on the decline in that aspect. We'll see.

Demonpenz 03-23-2022 01:04 PM

Thanks for wasp

Baby Lee 03-23-2022 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief (Post 16209305)
The same folks who are pissed we didn't keep Tyreek and pay him $30/yr are the same folks who bitch that we have Sorenson and Niemann as backups. If you want the latter to change, you can't pay the majority of your cap to 5 players...

Bullshit, I've poked fun at their incompetence, but never had any illusion that they were anything but the price of weapons elsewhere.

Decisions like Clark and the lack of cohesion throughout the defensive unit have been the bitch-point.

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 03-23-2022 01:04 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">As for Andy Reid and the <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> , the WR spot is a replaceable position in that system. Reid spent his formative coaching years with Mike Holmgren with the <a href="https://twitter.com/packers?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@packers</a> and the general belief was that the scheme/QB creates the WR. No need for a 1st rounder either.. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLDraft?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLDraft</a></p>&mdash; Bucky Brooks (@BuckyBrooks) <a href="https://twitter.com/BuckyBrooks/status/1506701580782907392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ChiTown 03-23-2022 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by R8RFAN (Post 16209330)
This move is really going to put a dent in PM's numbers

https://c.tenor.com/pgqf6BDXADIAAAAC...eve-carell.gif

Foreboding 03-23-2022 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 16208233)
**** this. Terrible ****ing trade. Literally ****ing terrible.

Holy crap!! I am a Buffalo Bills fan and Tyrek Hill scared me more than any other player in the league. That dude plays WR on video game mode. I don't love him being in the AFCE, but then, the Phins ain't got no Pat Mahommes tossing it to him.

Sorry for you guys, I would hate this as well too. But damn if it ain't good for the Bills. Hill is the ultimate weapon.

O.city 03-23-2022 01:05 PM

It sucks and I hate it to lose him.

But it's a business and shit happens. Move forward. All we know, Hardman explodes in that role and takes off, the Chiefs hit on a few draft picks and off to the races we go.

R8RFAN 03-23-2022 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 16209363)

ROFLLMAO

I know I know

OnTheWarpath15 03-23-2022 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16209360)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">As for Andy Reid and the <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> , the WR spot is a replaceable position in that system. Reid spent his formative coaching years with Mike Holmgren with the <a href="https://twitter.com/packers?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@packers</a> and the general belief was that the scheme/QB creates the WR. No need for a 1st rounder either.. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLDraft?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLDraft</a></p>&mdash; Bucky Brooks (@BuckyBrooks) <a href="https://twitter.com/BuckyBrooks/status/1506701580782907392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


I mean, that's great for 2025 and all, but...

That CERTAINLY cannot be the plan.

Discuss Thrower 03-23-2022 01:07 PM

I feel fairly confident in saying Hardman will come nowhere close to offering what Tyreek did.


He's Dexter McCluster 2: Electric Boogaloo

RaidersOftheCellar 03-23-2022 01:07 PM

It sucks, but let's not forget that the offense functioned pretty well without him for several games in 2019. Averaged close to 30 ppg, I think. They had their way with the Ravens' D without him.

He also barely played vs Pittsburgh last year (and Kelce didn't play at all) and they still had their way and looked as good as they had all season.

They can definitely find ways to replace the production, but it obviously sucks to lose the speed and homerun potential.

R8RFAN 03-23-2022 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209371)
I mean, that's great for 2025 and all, but...

That CERTAINLY cannot be the plan.

You can't replace a Tyreek Hill period unless it's a upgrade and only 1 team has that player now and he is under contract:D

ChiTown 03-23-2022 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16209360)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">As for Andy Reid and the <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> , the WR spot is a replaceable position in that system. Reid spent his formative coaching years with Mike Holmgren with the <a href="https://twitter.com/packers?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@packers</a> and the general belief was that the scheme/QB creates the WR. No need for a 1st rounder either.. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLDraft?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLDraft</a></p>&mdash; Bucky Brooks (@BuckyBrooks) <a href="https://twitter.com/BuckyBrooks/status/1506701580782907392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Ehhhh, I don't know about that. Losing one of the most electrifying WR's in the NFL is going to leave a dent. The question is "how big of a dent".

R8RFAN 03-23-2022 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 16209372)
I feel fairly confident in saying Hardman will come nowhere close to offering what Tyreek did.


He's Dexter McCluster 2: Electric Boogaloo

Way to go out on a limb

Kman34 03-23-2022 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foreboding (Post 16209364)
Holy crap!! I am a Buffalo Bills fan and Tyrek Hill scared me more than any other player in the league. That dude plays WR on video game mode. I don't love him being in the AFCE, but then, the Phins ain't got no Pat Mahommes tossing it to him.

Sorry for you guys, I would hate this as well too. But damn if it ain't good for the Bills. Hill is the ultimate weapon.

Go fall on a table...

IowaHawkeyeChief 03-23-2022 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 16209359)
Bullshit, I've poked fun at their incompetence, but never had any illusion that they were anything but the price of weapons elsewhere.

Decisions like Clark and the lack of cohesion throughout the defensive unit have been the bitch-point.

Correct... we agree. It's hard to pay up for low level talent when you are paying the bulk of your cap to 5-6 guys. We are then left with minimums being paid to Niemann and slightly more than minimum to Sorenson. Not paying Tyreek "could" effect that outcome, but paying Tyreek would have mandated that structure.

-King- 03-23-2022 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209371)
I mean, that's great for 2025 and all, but...

That CERTAINLY cannot be the plan.

Some of the same people who talk about how hard it is to play WR in Reid's system and how complicated it is to learn and use it as an excuse for mecoles development are now acting like replacing Hill and drafting a day 1 contributor will be so easy.

R8RFAN 03-23-2022 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 16209381)
Ehhhh, I don't know about that. Losing one of the most electrifying WR's in the NFL is going to leave a dent. The question is "how big of a dent".

Thats the word I have been looking for "electrifying"

Imon Yourside 03-23-2022 01:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kman34 (Post 16209384)
Go fall on a table...

Already did..that's why they're like that.

staylor26 03-23-2022 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 16209372)
I feel fairly confident in saying Hardman will come nowhere close to offering what Tyreek did.


He's Dexter McCluster 2: Electric Boogaloo

He’s not Tyreek, but the McCluster comparison is ****ing dumb.

FloridaMan88 03-23-2022 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE! (Post 16209360)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">As for Andy Reid and the <a href="https://twitter.com/Chiefs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@Chiefs</a> , the WR spot is a replaceable position in that system. Reid spent his formative coaching years with Mike Holmgren with the <a href="https://twitter.com/packers?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@packers</a> and the general belief was that the scheme/QB creates the WR. No need for a 1st rounder either.. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/NFLDraft?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#NFLDraft</a></p>&mdash; Bucky Brooks (@BuckyBrooks) <a href="https://twitter.com/BuckyBrooks/status/1506701580782907392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Thinking that the WR position can be propped up by scheme/system rather than talent has gotten the Chiefs in trouble before under Andy Reid... i.e. the 2014 season when no Chiefs WR caught a TD and they missed the playoffs.

Jet Chip Wasp 03-23-2022 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ArrowHeader (Post 16208627)
Great, we get more picks Veach can miss on. ****ing brilliant.

Did he miss on Creed Humphrey and Trey Smith? No.

DRM08 03-23-2022 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 16209373)
It sucks, but let's not forget that the offense functioned pretty well without him for several games in 2019. Averaged close to 30 ppg, I think. They had their way with the Ravens' D without him.

He also barely played vs Pittsburgh last year (and Kelce didn't play at all) and they still had their way and looked as good as they had all season.

They can definitely find ways to replace the production, but it obviously sucks to lose the speed and homerun potential.

That Pittsburgh game was interesting. Mahomes stopped focusing so much on Kelce & Tyreek. He spread the ball around to different people and it was very effective.

OnTheWarpath15 03-23-2022 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 16209387)
Some of the same people who talk about how hard it is to play WR in Reid's system and how complicated it is to learn and use it as an excuse for mecoles development are now acting like replacing Hill and drafting a day 1 contributor will be so easy.

Yep, and that's what's frustrating me.

I'm disappointed in the return, but the trade had to happen.

But to act like 2022 isn't going to be a down year (unless Veach makes an out of nowhere trade) is ridiculous.

Speaking of trade - this guy "reporting" is a moron, but a mid-round pick here wouldn't hurt for a decent option who is under control for two more years.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">**UPDATED NFL RUMORS** <br>Source: Chiefs are talking with Jaguars about (WR) Laviska Shenault .. Jags have him on trade market 3-4 teams involved.</p>&mdash; IB THE GAMBLER �� (@incarceratedbob) <a href="https://twitter.com/incarceratedbob/status/1506691169719365642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 03-23-2022 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jet Chip Wasp (Post 16209403)
Did he miss on Creed Humphrey and Trey Smith? No.

Or Sneed or Gay or Bolton? Fenton?

The Franchise 03-23-2022 01:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209407)
Yep, and that's what's frustrating me.

I'm disappointed in the return, but the trade had to happen.

But to act like 2022 isn't going to be a down year (unless Veach makes an out of nowhere trade) is ridiculous.

Speaking of trade - this guy "reporting" is a moron, but a mid-round pick here wouldn't hurt.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">**UPDATED NFL RUMORS** <br>Source: Chiefs are talking with Jaguars about (WR) Laviska Shenault .. Jags have him on trade market 3-4 teams involved.</p>&mdash; IB THE GAMBLER 🔌 (@incarceratedbob) <a href="https://twitter.com/incarceratedbob/status/1506691169719365642?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I would love that trade. He doesn’t bring the speed element but he can do some shit out of the backfield like Samuel does in San Fran.

FloridaMan88 03-23-2022 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jet Chip Wasp (Post 16209403)
Did he miss on Creed Humphrey and Trey Smith? No.

Since we are talking WR's... Cornell Powell?

RunKC 03-23-2022 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16209395)
Thinking that the WR position can be propped up by scheme/system rather than talent has gotten the Chiefs in trouble before under Andy Reid... i.e. the 2014 season when no Chiefs WR caught a TD and they missed the playoffs.

Alex Smith is no Patrick Mahomes and we have 3 picks in the top 50 in a strong WR draft

OnTheWarpath15 03-23-2022 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16209416)
I would love that trade. He doesn’t bring the speed element but he can do some shit out of the backfield like Samuel does in San Fran.

Agree, but you're still waiting a few years to develop a legit WR1.

But for now, and what he would cost - I'd absolutely do it.

displacedinMN 03-23-2022 01:16 PM

What the ****......

Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

VAGOMO 4 LIFE! 03-23-2022 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16209416)
I would love that trade. He doesn’t bring the speed element but he can do some shit out of the backfield like Samuel does in San Fran.

So can Hardman

The Franchise 03-23-2022 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15 (Post 16209428)
Agree, but you're still waiting a few years to develop a legit WR1.

But for now, and what he would cost - I'd absolutely do it.

And it is what it is at this point. Put talent on the field anyway you can.

MahomesKnows 03-23-2022 01:16 PM

Go get Shenault. Draft a WR with a 1 and 3. The offense will still be very good. Won't be at the elite level it has been, but good enough to win, especially if the defense gets better.

ChiTown 03-23-2022 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16209416)
I would love that trade. He doesn’t bring the speed element but he can do some shit out of the backfield like Samuel does in San Fran.

4.58 at 6'1 230#'s works for me

staylor26 03-23-2022 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88 (Post 16209425)
Since we are talking WR's... Cornell Powell?

LMAO

A 6th round rookie wasn’t a stud?

Oh the horror!

DJ's left nut 03-23-2022 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16208730)
Like you said….Veach just needs to let that draft board come to him.

And use that newly gained cap space to get guys like Barnett and Kyzir in here to build up that defense.

My guy Calvin Austin sure feels like a hell of a fit now.

BryanBusby 03-23-2022 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 16209441)
LMAO

A 6th round rookie wasn’t a stud?

Oh the horror!

Right. What a butt ****ing moron LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.