![]() |
Quote:
|
Yeah. That Smith shit was bad. But IIRC the mods stepped in on that and did some banning for Smith derailing.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Always feel so bad |
Quote:
Like I said, we ultimately end up where are now. I just don’t think we hit it before 2020 (because it has been a growing issue) if we don’t segregate. But we’ll never know for certain. |
Yeah, the Lounge is to blame for the nonsense going on in DC
Get. The. ****. Outta. Here. With. That. Nonsense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You’re an outlier, my friend. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There was actually a lot of banning for that issue. I think I wore out a mouse when it was at its peak. |
Quote:
But they’ve been enabled for years, and know the moderation team won’t step in. |
I have no self control.
Every mothers last one of you. Can kiss my ass. o:-) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Am I wrong with this assumption? |
Quote:
The integration of sports and politics is bigger than a chiefs site sub forum. I'm not sure theres a simple solution, but I'll help find it if I can. |
Quote:
Food for thought. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Not as much as people think, but with that said, people can run two accounts without be detected, if they know what they're doing. If I catch them doing it, I ban one of them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also as far as I am concerned patteeu is a good dude and good poster. |
Quote:
Truth |
For the record, I have two forums I frequent: this one, and a hockey message board.
The hockey board completely bans all political topics. This has been a ****ing godsend in a time like this, IMO. And I’m not a person who just avoids politics; I’m very active in discussions like that. But when I visit my hockey message board, or football message board, I just want these type of discussions to go away. I can’t spend 24/7 thinking about the shit thats happening in this country right now; it’s draining, and tiresome. A place like this is supposed to be an escape from all that. And in the past, even though a lot of y’all are on the opposite end of the spectrum as I am, I’ve been able to completely avoid stuff like that for the most part, and just mingle as a fellow Chiefs fan. It’s getting harder and harder though, as I said, and it sucks because I truly love this forum, especially since I live on the east coast and don’t have any actual Chiefs fan friendship. Hell, I barely know anyone who watches any football, let alone to the level I do. I know, different forums, different philosophies, different circumstances, etc. And I get that this is something that was borne a long time ago. But I think it may be time to come up with some sort of solution or compromise, because I know I’m not the only person who feels this way. That’s just my two cents. I know I’m a relative n00b on this forum but like I said I love being here and hate wanting to distance myself. Trying to post in the Chiefs subreddit just depressed the **** out of me because this place is so much better, warts and all. |
Quote:
Now we have extremists trying to jettison the sub-forum altogether and that’s about as unCP as you can get. If Austin was in his grave, god forbid, he’d be rolling. :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It really doesn't matter what happens, a large segment of the board is going to be pissed about every decision you make. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
And for the record, the "spirit of the board" when it was first conceived was "we're not the Star board".
The anything goes model wasn't a rule, it was just something that happened with organic growth. Kyle never intended for CP to become what it is. We never could have dreamed it would become as popular as it is now. Those early days most likely weren't sustainable, so while I understand your lament for those early days gone by, the board was always going to change when this many people gather in one place. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Letting 30-40 out of 10k rule the roost is ridiculous. |
Quote:
Its addition by subtraction. |
Quote:
Pretty taxing really |
Quote:
|
This really isn’t that difficult, no one has the balls to make the decision.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
40 people is a lot. Furthermore, I never said anything about allowing them to rule the roost. I said no matter what decision a mod makes, somebody is going to be mad at them. Doesn't mean the mod has to let them win but it's still trying and taxing to have that many people acting like children because they didn't get their way. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Trust me, I've been there. Even some of the most despised posters have had their perceived enemies take their side when it appears they've been a victim of "mod abuse". |
Quote:
MU is not a choice at this point unfortunately, it went away. Forced Lurkers however, is still in place, but I've only used that once. Pretty much the choices are getting romper treatment, or getting banned. |
Quote:
I don't find it hard to see or talks politics in everything like others do. I can watch the NBA and not be outraged or offended. Same thing with the NFL. I don't get it but certain people seem to want to be outraged 24x7. |
Quote:
And we’re gonna let that 10% drive decisions that impact the other 90%? Just end it. It was time 10 years ago, it’s certainly time now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Of course, but when it was started, there were still a lot of unknowns and a lot of people were freaked out. I know a lot of people wanted to keep it front and center in the Lounge. It was obvious that it would be politically charged, but there was also a warning in the header about it. A lot of people got shit canned from that thread because they couldn't control themselves. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
All I'm saying is that if they were to say, hypothetically nuke DC, there's going to be a large segment of people, including people that don't even use DC, that are going to be upset. And if they don't nuke DC, there's going to be large segment of people, including people that don't even use DC, that are going to be upset. It's going to result in extra work for the mods no matter what they do because every argument has two sides. Settling an argument will always be seen as either a win or a loss depending on which side you're on. |
Quote:
Okay, so if there is 40 out of 250 people as you mentioned, that's 16% of the total. If there is 40 out of 300, that's 13%. Is 13-16% that significant to the overall picture? That being said, I have to imagine that in 2000, there probably wasn't very many politics message boards back then. Now I'm sure there's plenty of them that they can participate, since obviously some of them don't even talk Chiefs or sports in general. There has been some members (not going to name names) that originally was a frequent user on the Lounge and not at DC, but now it's completely the other way around. Edited: I see you responded to OTWP15's comment. Disregard. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
At some point Kyle is going to have step in publicly and tell us what he ultimately decides for this place. I realize that gets a bit touchy because people have donated money to improve and keep the place running. Hell, I donated back in the day, it’s been on my mind to donate again, it’s just one thing after another keeps coming up (financially, nothing to do with this place). But, at the end of the day it is his baby and he is going to have to step in on this matter, publicly, he very well may have to the mod team in private but, if so, some public backing wouldn’t hurt them. And I don’t view the mods as lost or with any kind of agenda (personal biases will always be a factor, it’s how you choose to handle them in your given roles), I just think an official position from the owner of the board would them, and everyone some good. Then we know. Then we can decide if we want to co to us to participate here or not (not a threat on my part, I’m speaking generally). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Taco has a long history with this board, including the football side. He’s not uncivil like so many others around here. I don’t believe he posts politics in the Lounge. He's interesting and entertaining. |
Quote:
Hey I think today I will go join a Dolphins board just so I can talk politics. Who does that? Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't have any issues with the mods at all. [sarcasm in good jest] Except for Da Face needs to fix his you know what or yelling at BAWAN!!!!! [/sarcasm in good jest] |
If you want to ban DC, you are going to have to ban almost all other news and topics other than football in this forum.
|
Quote:
When are you going to buy me a beer asshole? :) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Been out tonight. What'd I miss?!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If I understood correctly, we have to vote to either ban DC or choose 5 members that post only in DC to be the new mod team. I'm sure Rainman is crafting a new poll for it. Imma choose the Gaz option |
Quote:
Hell, if the Royals can get their own forum, why not DC. Nutjob Planet, or something. |
Unfortunately all of the major sport leagues and the media outlets that cover them have pumped politics into sports. Then when those views are opposite politically of the majority of the six states that comprise the main Chiefs fan base you are going to have some friction. Throw in the normal election year bullshit, you going to have some carry over. Then top it all off with COVID bullshit. That basically follows the same political lines which your views of it are.
Those 3 factors are what you are seeing at play. It's basically current climate of the year. |
Quote:
Never heard a word from the mods or AustinChief. Followed up several times. Not even a response. Thats a bad idea. Nothing. It was a missed chance that could have possibly changed the path that led to the extreme rancor and personal insults that are a fact of life in DC these days. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I for one, love all our friends on the other side of the aisle (no homo)... We have our differences, but at the end of the day we'll all survive and come back here and talk about something..
|
Quote:
For all their bloviating about being a force for change, they basically stopped calling attention to it after week one. The players are still wearing names and slogans, as are the end zones but the NFL and networks are basically ignoring at this point. I think a lot of us knew this would happen though. There was nothing in place to make sure momentum was maintained. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.