![]() |
Pro Sports Fandom
Pro Sports Fandom @ProSportsFandom Kareem Hunt has more yards (538) than the Ravens, Bills, Panthers, and Texans have net passing yards through week three. |
Quote:
The list of 2,000 yard rushers is littered with guys who were never the same player again. Even an absolute freak like Barry Sanders, who did it on a mere 335 carries, saw his YPC drop by nearly 2 full yards the following year. Ignoring the near term and long-term prosperity of the team so you can get some meaningless record is just as dumb a thing as I've heard since...well probably something else you said. |
|
At this point, having Hunt 100% healthy for the playoffs should be the teams #1 priority.
This is a super bowl team with him in the equation. Probably not without him. Anyone else got the feeling this is going to be a special year? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't get what people mean by 'keeping him healthy' the guy is averaging 16 carries a game. What are we supposed to give him the ball 10-times a game? Give the guy the ball as much as possible (within reason). He's a great player and a rookie. He is still learning believe it or not. |
Quote:
20 - 25 total touches is not out of line. AT all. You think his totals are about right? Okay. He's averaging about 19 touches per game, and you think 1-6 more touches per game is a big deal? Whatever man. I'm guessing you're more of a 'split backfield' type of guy. I'm not. I like having a starting RB. Christ, JC ended up hurt and we did this 'conserve him so he doesn't break down" shit with him. Ride the horse until he's ready to be put down. As for Penbrook... I don't determine my opinion based on who says what. A broken clock can be right twice a day, and I've never supported the 'save your RB until tomorrow' mentality espoused by so many on this forum. Does Priest Holmes last 7 seasons instead of 3 if we work him less? No, probably not. Productive RB's don't have a long shelf life. The LT's and AP's are a rare breed. Not using them won't increase it. It just wastes them when they're good. |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
25 touches/gm is absolutely too many. And 20/gm is too many for a rookie RB that you hope is still running effectively in the post-season, especially with his style of play. Hitting that mark on occasion isn't a problem, but if you're averaging that many touches a game, the guy's going to be beat to shit and gassed by the end of the year. "oh well it's just 6 more touches/gm" is crazy - that's a full 33% more contact. It's nearly 100 more times he gets hit over the course of a year. Yes, there's a massive difference between 18/19 touches and 24/25. |
Quote:
Again - folks are responding to the 'feed Hunt the rock' crowd by saying that Reid is actually doing it perfectly right now. He's getting about the right amount of touches. |
I want Akeem back there and just have a Hunt run the ball everytime :)
|
Quote:
Okay. Whatever you say. :rolleyes: I'm okay with a starting RB getting the load of a starting RB. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He's not going to be 100% by the playoffs otherwise. Everyone is dinged up after 16 weeks of football, including opposing defenses. Why not apply that same logic to every important player? Let's not have Kelce in on those blocking plays. He could get tangled up and hurt his knee! |
:)
No one knew he'd be this good but it looks like the Tomlinson/E. Smith comparisons weren't so far off the mark... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Moreover, when it comes to contact in the NFL, more is always worse than less and we absolutely know that more touches equals more contact. You're being remarkably obtuse here. You know there's no bright line cut off yet you keep trying to hammer theoretical end points as some kind of 'gotchya!' moment. You also know that RB is among the most physically taxing positions in the game. Ignoring that fact greatly increases the chance that he's worn down and at what expense? It is better to have fewer carries on your RB in January - full stop. There's no argument to the contrary. You don't go out there and bubble wrap the guy to go 8-8 in order to save those carries, but there's absolutely a point where the juice doesn't justify the squeeze. If you're force-feeding him the ball so he you can win games by 17 instead of 3 and come January he's lost just enough burst to not be able to outrun the angle on that cutback run - what the hell was the point? Reid's handling him perfectly. No, there's no cause to spike his touches. |
I don't even feel the need to reply to anything right now. DJ has typed out my responses for me...and did a better job than I would have in his wording.
Thanks, bud. Some of this teams fans just EXPECT an early exit from the playoffs and have lost track of the big picture...winning it all. I think KC has a nice chance at winning it all if Hunt is healthy come playoff time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Kareem can do the same thing for the Chiefs that Terrell Davis did for Denver....if he stays healthy.
|
There is a reall good article on Hunt in the Star today by Millinger. I can't link it, but someone should when you can. Very long article, but goes back to his childhood.
At 7, he wasn't tackled in his first two games. Had another game... against a team that Mitch Trabisky was on... where he rushed for nearly 1000 yards and had 11 (I think) touchdowns. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
No one clinches a playoff spot in September, but teams with playoff aspirations absolutely have to plan for them. |
Quote:
Of course, that would mean he wouldn't be able to shitty game manage coast his way through the game as soon as he gained a lead in the 2nd quarter. |
Reid had us closer to winning a home divisional playoff than any coach in our history. A 2 point loss where the refs took away play game tying play. This was the same game where we had a mash unit on the defensive line. We already knew it was a bad matchup and lost by 2
If we are healthy and at home I like our chances vs anyone |
AFC player of the month. Last time a rookie won this award was 17 years ago.
https://twitter.com/RLiuNFL/status/913395530906193920 |
The Chiefs are averaging more than a half yard MORE per play than any other team.
https://i.imgur.com/ki4hUf0.jpg That's all Kareem Hunt. You take away his 78 yard rec, 52 yard run and 69 yard run and the average drops to 6.05. |
Quote:
|
Kyle Brandt said Kareem Hunt reminds him of Ricky Waters, but he's better catching the ball than Ricky was.
Not a bad comp |
Player of the Month is huge honor for your FIRST month!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Health is the most important thing. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here is the article that was in the Star this morning:
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...173491466.html Long read, but very good. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's not just scheme.
Spencer Ware wasn't breaking runs like that last year. Look at this run: https://i.imgur.com/gnULqLV.gif "Scheme" failed there. And this is a good 15 yards after first contact: https://i.imgur.com/ZlSJxXZ.gif We haven't seen the combination of leg drive and acceleration like this since LJ. |
Quote:
|
We're tricking the rest of the NFL by running right up the middle of the defense.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-28-2017/7S31en.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://bsndenver.com/wp-content/uplo...vs-raiders.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Does it depress you that Hunt has equaled 15% of CJ Andersons career yards in three games? |
CJ Anderson is a ****ing scrub that can't make it through a season.
Get your bullshit out of the thread for the best back in football. |
Quote:
|
Crickets
|
Anyone have his yards after 1st contact compared to the rest of the league?
|
Quote:
|
Hunt is the top-ranked DVOA RB, though. That means something.
http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/rb |
Oh, they dropped this though. He's #1.
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hater. |
Quote:
|
There are literally zero owners, GMs or coaches in the NFL that would take CJ Anderson over Kareem Hunt.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.