ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The Kareem Hunt Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=307438)

penbrook 09-26-2017 02:59 PM

Pro Sports Fandom
Pro Sports Fandom @ProSportsFandom
Kareem Hunt has more yards (538) than the Ravens, Bills, Panthers, and Texans have net passing yards through week three.

DJ's left nut 09-26-2017 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 13107359)
More carried mean the better chance he has at breaking the regular season rushing record

Who gives a shit?

The list of 2,000 yard rushers is littered with guys who were never the same player again. Even an absolute freak like Barry Sanders, who did it on a mere 335 carries, saw his YPC drop by nearly 2 full yards the following year.

Ignoring the near term and long-term prosperity of the team so you can get some meaningless record is just as dumb a thing as I've heard since...well probably something else you said.

KChiefs1 09-26-2017 07:02 PM

https://youtu.be/hNuFmP6USCc

BossChief 09-26-2017 09:16 PM

At this point, having Hunt 100% healthy for the playoffs should be the teams #1 priority.

This is a super bowl team with him in the equation.

Probably not without him.

Anyone else got the feeling this is going to be a special year?

penbrook 09-26-2017 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 13107966)
At this point, having Hunt 100% healthy for the playoffs should be the teams #1 priority.

This is a super bowl team with him in the equation.

Probably not without him.

Anyone else got the feeling this is going to be a special year?

Damn! Mahomes on the team and we win the super bowl. It’s the Mahomo magic!

gold_and_red 09-26-2017 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 13107966)
At this point, having Hunt 100% healthy for the playoffs should be the teams #1 priority.

This is a super bowl team with him in the equation.

Probably not without him.

Anyone else got the feeling this is going to be a special year?

One game at a time. But I sense that the AFC old guard of Brady and Ben will be supplanted soon. We seem to have the type of team that will be knocking on the door for the next decade or so and once or maybe a couple of times the stars will align.

penbrook 09-26-2017 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gold_and_red (Post 13108071)
One game at a time. But I sense that the AFC old guard of Brady and Ben will be supplanted soon. We seem to have the type of team that will be knocking on the door for the next decade or so and once or maybe a couple of times the stars will align.

It’ll be years of Smitty vs Bortles!!

CupidStunt 09-27-2017 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 13107966)
At this point, having Hunt 100% healthy for the playoffs should be the teams #1 priority.

This is a super bowl team with him in the equation.

Probably not without him.

Anyone else got the feeling this is going to be a special year?

It's week 4. The #1 priority is ****ing winning games, dude.

Red Dawg 09-27-2017 04:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gold_and_red (Post 13108071)
One game at a time. But I sense that the AFC old guard of Brady and Ben will be supplanted soon. We seem to have the type of team that will be knocking on the door for the next decade or so and once or maybe a couple of times the stars will align.

Brady is over this season if he last that long. No way Bill plays a 41 year old QB with his younger future guy just sitting their making 20 mil. Ben almost retired and lately looks like he should have.

PAChiefsGuy 09-27-2017 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CupidStunt (Post 13108197)
It's week 4. The #1 priority is ****ing winning games, dude.

This.

I don't get what people mean by 'keeping him healthy' the guy is averaging 16 carries a game. What are we supposed to give him the ball 10-times a game?

Give the guy the ball as much as possible (within reason). He's a great player and a rookie. He is still learning believe it or not.

WhiteWhale 09-27-2017 09:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13107284)
Seriously, what the hell are you talking about?

Who's saying to cut him down to 12 carries? At most, the majority of folks are saying that Reid is working him about right. Some folks are being stupid and saying he should carry 20-25 times/gm, which is a really good way to ensure your RB absolutely sucks going forward.

BC said he shouldn't be getting that many carries - he's right. There has been exactly 1 RB that's remained effective after getting 25 carries/gm. Moreover, there have been very very few that have had much of a career after getting better than 350 touches - period.

Being a ballcarrier is damn tough work and extremely hard on a body. It's worse still when you run like Hunt does. If Reid can keep Hunt in the 15-20 touches/gm range he'd greatly increase the likelihood that Hunt is healthy come the post-season and greatly increase his long term value to the franchise.

I don't even see this as being particularly worth arguing.

If you find yourself siding with penbrook, you're almost certainly wrong.

Touches and carries aren't the same.

20 - 25 total touches is not out of line. AT all.

You think his totals are about right?

Okay. He's averaging about 19 touches per game, and you think 1-6 more touches per game is a big deal?

Whatever man. I'm guessing you're more of a 'split backfield' type of guy. I'm not. I like having a starting RB.

Christ, JC ended up hurt and we did this 'conserve him so he doesn't break down" shit with him. Ride the horse until he's ready to be put down.

As for Penbrook... I don't determine my opinion based on who says what. A broken clock can be right twice a day, and I've never supported the 'save your RB until tomorrow' mentality espoused by so many on this forum. Does Priest Holmes last 7 seasons instead of 3 if we work him less? No, probably not. Productive RB's don't have a long shelf life. The LT's and AP's are a rare breed. Not using them won't increase it. It just wastes them when they're good.

Hammock Parties 09-27-2017 09:15 AM

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DKvTXuCW4AAAu-n.jpg

thegame214 09-27-2017 09:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13108422)

:clap: :clap: :clap:

MIAdragon 09-27-2017 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 13108209)
This.

I don't get what people mean by 'keeping him healthy' the guy is averaging 16 carries a game. What are we supposed to give him the ball 10-times a game?

Give the guy the ball as much as possible (within reason). He's a great player and a rookie. He is still learning believe it or not.

He takes 4-5 hits a carry, you can't look at the raw numbers with him.

DJ's left nut 09-27-2017 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 13108417)
Touches and carries aren't the same.

20 - 25 total touches is not out of line. AT all.

You think his totals are about right?

Okay. He's averaging about 19 touches per game, and you think 1-6 more touches per game is a big deal?

Whatever man. I'm guessing you're more of a 'split backfield' type of guy. I'm not. I like having a starting RB.

The carries v. touches distinction has been lessened significantly since the rise of the short passing game. A halfback is far more likely to get 5-6 catches that are 'passes' in name only these days. They're effectively runs.

25 touches/gm is absolutely too many. And 20/gm is too many for a rookie RB that you hope is still running effectively in the post-season, especially with his style of play.

Hitting that mark on occasion isn't a problem, but if you're averaging that many touches a game, the guy's going to be beat to shit and gassed by the end of the year.

"oh well it's just 6 more touches/gm" is crazy - that's a full 33% more contact. It's nearly 100 more times he gets hit over the course of a year. Yes, there's a massive difference between 18/19 touches and 24/25.

DJ's left nut 09-27-2017 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 13108209)
This.

I don't get what people mean by 'keeping him healthy' the guy is averaging 16 carries a game. What are we supposed to give him the ball 10-times a game?

Give the guy the ball as much as possible (within reason). He's a great player and a rookie. He is still learning believe it or not.

Who is arguing to give him the ball less? Some of you insist on constructing a straw man here.

Again - folks are responding to the 'feed Hunt the rock' crowd by saying that Reid is actually doing it perfectly right now. He's getting about the right amount of touches.

thegame214 09-27-2017 09:23 AM

I want Akeem back there and just have a Hunt run the ball everytime :)

WhiteWhale 09-27-2017 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13108433)
The carries v. touches distinction has been lessened significantly since the rise of the short passing game. A halfback is far more likely to get 5-6 catches that are 'passes' in name only these days. They're effectively runs.

25 touches/gm is absolutely too many. And 20/gm is too many for a rookie RB that you hope is still running effectively in the post-season, especially with his style of play.

Hitting that mark on occasion isn't a problem, but if you're averaging that many touches a game, the guy's going to be beat to shit and gassed by the end of the year.

"oh well it's just 6 more touches/gm" is crazy - that's a full 33% more contact. It's nearly 100 more times he gets hit over the course of a year. Yes, there's a massive difference between 18/19 touches and 24/25.

So 320 total touches is too much and you want to keep it under 300?

Okay. Whatever you say. :rolleyes: I'm okay with a starting RB getting the load of a starting RB.

The Franchise 09-27-2017 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 13108448)
So 320 total touches is too much and you want to keep it under 300?

Okay. Whatever you say. :rolleyes: I'm okay with a starting RB getting the load of a starting RB.

Dude....you won't be ok with it when we get into the playoffs and Hunt is dinged up and isn't 100% effective.

WhiteWhale 09-27-2017 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13108454)
Dude....you won't be ok with it when we get into the playoffs and Hunt is dinged up and isn't 100% effective.

That could happen otherwise. The only way to ensure that won't happen is to start Charcandrick West.

He's not going to be 100% by the playoffs otherwise. Everyone is dinged up after 16 weeks of football, including opposing defenses.

Why not apply that same logic to every important player? Let's not have Kelce in on those blocking plays. He could get tangled up and hurt his knee!

Rausch 09-27-2017 09:44 AM

:)

No one knew he'd be this good but it looks like the Tomlinson/E. Smith comparisons weren't so far off the mark...

thegame214 09-27-2017 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 13108469)
:)

No one knew he'd be this good but it looks like the Tomlinson/E. Smith comparisons weren't so far off the mark...

More Terrell Davis to me personally, but anything related to those names is impressive as hell!

DJ's left nut 09-27-2017 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WhiteWhale (Post 13108462)
That could happen otherwise. The only way to ensure that won't happen is to start Charcandrick West.

He's not going to be 100% by the playoffs otherwise. Everyone is dinged up after 16 weeks of football, including opposing defenses.

Why not apply that same logic to every important player? Let's not have Kelce in on those blocking plays. He could get tangled up and hurt his knee!

It could happen at 200 or it could happen at 400. Nobody knows where the line is but it's safe to assume that the more carries you give the guy, the more likely you are to hit it.

Moreover, when it comes to contact in the NFL, more is always worse than less and we absolutely know that more touches equals more contact.

You're being remarkably obtuse here. You know there's no bright line cut off yet you keep trying to hammer theoretical end points as some kind of 'gotchya!' moment. You also know that RB is among the most physically taxing positions in the game. Ignoring that fact greatly increases the chance that he's worn down and at what expense?

It is better to have fewer carries on your RB in January - full stop. There's no argument to the contrary. You don't go out there and bubble wrap the guy to go 8-8 in order to save those carries, but there's absolutely a point where the juice doesn't justify the squeeze. If you're force-feeding him the ball so he you can win games by 17 instead of 3 and come January he's lost just enough burst to not be able to outrun the angle on that cutback run - what the hell was the point?

Reid's handling him perfectly. No, there's no cause to spike his touches.

BossChief 09-27-2017 11:26 AM

I don't even feel the need to reply to anything right now. DJ has typed out my responses for me...and did a better job than I would have in his wording.

Thanks, bud.

Some of this teams fans just EXPECT an early exit from the playoffs and have lost track of the big picture...winning it all.

I think KC has a nice chance at winning it all if Hunt is healthy come playoff time.

penbrook 09-27-2017 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thegame214 (Post 13108472)
More Terrell Davis to me personally, but anything related to those names is impressive as hell!

People say he’s a better Ricky Williams

ToxSocks 09-27-2017 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 13108933)
People say he’s a better Ricky Williams

I read Ricky Williams yesterday. I think that's the best comparison so far.

BoneKrusher 09-27-2017 02:39 PM

Kareem can do the same thing for the Chiefs that Terrell Davis did for Denver....if he stays healthy.

Coogs 09-28-2017 05:24 AM

There is a reall good article on Hunt in the Star today by Millinger. I can't link it, but someone should when you can. Very long article, but goes back to his childhood.

At 7, he wasn't tackled in his first two games. Had another game... against a team that Mitch Trabisky was on... where he rushed for nearly 1000 yards and had 11 (I think) touchdowns.

PAChiefsGuy 09-28-2017 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13108477)
It could happen at 200 or it could happen at 400. Nobody knows where the line is but it's safe to assume that the more carries you give the guy, the more likely you are to hit it.

Moreover, when it comes to contact in the NFL, more is always worse than less and we absolutely know that more touches equals more contact.

You're being remarkably obtuse here. You know there's no bright line cut off yet you keep trying to hammer theoretical end points as some kind of 'gotchya!' moment. You also know that RB is among the most physically taxing positions in the game. Ignoring that fact greatly increases the chance that he's worn down and at what expense?

It is better to have fewer carries on your RB in January - full stop. There's no argument to the contrary. You don't go out there and bubble wrap the guy to go 8-8 in order to save those carries, but there's absolutely a point where the juice doesn't justify the squeeze. If you're force-feeding him the ball so he you can win games by 17 instead of 3 and come January he's lost just enough burst to not be able to outrun the angle on that cutback run - what the hell was the point?

Reid's handling him perfectly. No, there's no cause to spike his touches.

We haven't made the playoffs yet so this whole talk of limiting his touches for January is a moot point until we clinch.

milkman 09-28-2017 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 13109770)
We haven't made the playoffs yet so this whole talk of limiting his touches for January is a moot point until we clinch.

No it isn't.

No one clinches a playoff spot in September, but teams with playoff aspirations absolutely have to plan for them.

RealSNR 09-28-2017 07:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 13109770)
We haven't made the playoffs yet so this whole talk of limiting his touches for January is a moot point until we clinch.

Why does Hunt have to be the guy to clinch those wins? Make your goddamn boyfriend do it.

Of course, that would mean he wouldn't be able to shitty game manage coast his way through the game as soon as he gained a lead in the 2nd quarter.

Best22 09-28-2017 07:18 AM

Reid had us closer to winning a home divisional playoff than any coach in our history. A 2 point loss where the refs took away play game tying play. This was the same game where we had a mash unit on the defensive line. We already knew it was a bad matchup and lost by 2

If we are healthy and at home I like our chances vs anyone

RunKC 09-28-2017 08:45 AM

AFC player of the month. Last time a rookie won this award was 17 years ago.

https://twitter.com/RLiuNFL/status/913395530906193920

Hammock Parties 09-28-2017 09:08 AM

The Chiefs are averaging more than a half yard MORE per play than any other team.

https://i.imgur.com/ki4hUf0.jpg

That's all Kareem Hunt. You take away his 78 yard rec, 52 yard run and 69 yard run and the average drops to 6.05.

The Franchise 09-28-2017 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13109983)
The Chiefs are averaging more than a half yard MORE per play than any other team.

https://i.imgur.com/ki4hUf0.jpg

That's all Kareem Hunt. You take away his 78 yard rec, 52 yard run and 69 yard run and the average drops to 6.05.

To give credit where credit is due.....that 78 yard reception is on Smith as well. He dropped a ****ing dime to Hunt.

RunKC 09-28-2017 09:17 AM

Kyle Brandt said Kareem Hunt reminds him of Ricky Waters, but he's better catching the ball than Ricky was.

Not a bad comp

thegame214 09-28-2017 09:18 AM

Player of the Month is huge honor for your FIRST month!

Hammock Parties 09-28-2017 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13109989)
To give credit where credit is due.....that 78 yard reception is on Smith as well. He dropped a ****ing dime to Hunt.

And 45 of the 78 yards were RAC.

jjchieffan 09-28-2017 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13110010)
And 45 of the 78 yards were RAC.

But if Smith hadn't dropped it to him in stride, he could have been tackled before he got those yards. I swear, you try way too hard to take Credit from Smith. But you can't do it there.

KChiefs1 09-28-2017 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher (Post 13108960)
Kareem can do the same thing for the Chiefs that Terrell Davis did for Denver....if he stays healthy.



Health is the most important thing.

KCrockaholic 09-28-2017 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13110010)
And 45 of the 78 yards were RAC.

Sometimes QB's ball placement can dictate RAC. His placement allowed Hunt to get those other 45 yards.

DJ's left nut 09-28-2017 10:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13110010)
And 45 of the 78 yards were RAC.

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/K0AnEB2t2EM" width="480" height="198" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/K0AnEB2t2EM">via GIPHY</a></p>

Hammock Parties 09-28-2017 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 13110068)
<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/K0AnEB2t2EM" width="480" height="198" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/K0AnEB2t2EM">via GIPHY</a></p>

https://m.popkey.co/99bb27/O9ro9.gif

Rain Man 09-28-2017 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13109933)
AFC player of the month. Last time a rookie won this award was 17 years ago.

https://twitter.com/RLiuNFL/status/913395530906193920

Wowza. I'm thinking this was a really good use of a 3rd round pick.

DaFace 09-28-2017 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 13109933)
AFC player of the month. Last time a rookie won this award was 17 years ago.

https://twitter.com/RLiuNFL/status/913395530906193920

Deserves its own thread IMO.

FlaChief58 09-28-2017 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13110010)
And 45 of the 78 yards were RAC.

So Smith dropped a 33 yard pass on the money leading his reciever so he can out run the defender for the td and your dumbass still tries to bash him? No wonder no one takes you seriously

Coogs 09-28-2017 04:46 PM

Here is the article that was in the Star this morning:

http://www.kansascity.com/sports/spt...173491466.html

Long read, but very good.

Hammock Parties 09-28-2017 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flachief58 (Post 13110498)
So Smith dropped a 33 yard pass on the money leading his reciever so he can out run the defender for the td and your dumbass still tries to bash him? No wonder no one takes you seriously

It still takes a special player to take that one to the house.

Quesadilla Joe 09-28-2017 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13109983)

That's all Kareem Hunt. You take away his 78 yard rec, 52 yard run and 69 yard run and the average drops to 6.05.

It's scheme. Not knocking Hunt, but he's not the next Jim Brown or anything. The big plays will start being less common as teams adjust to the Chiefs' trickery.

Hammock Parties 09-28-2017 05:17 PM

It's not just scheme.

Spencer Ware wasn't breaking runs like that last year.

Look at this run:

https://i.imgur.com/gnULqLV.gif

"Scheme" failed there.

And this is a good 15 yards after first contact:

https://i.imgur.com/ZlSJxXZ.gif

We haven't seen the combination of leg drive and acceleration like this since LJ.

ToxSocks 09-28-2017 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110555)
It's scheme. Not knocking Hunt, but he's not the next Jim Brown or anything. The big plays will start being less common as teams adjust to the Chiefs' trickery.

"Trickery" LMAO

The Franchise 09-28-2017 05:19 PM

We're tricking the rest of the NFL by running right up the middle of the defense.

RunKC 09-28-2017 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110555)
It's scheme. Not knocking Hunt, but he's not the next Jim Brown or anything. The big plays will start being less common as teams adjust to the Chiefs' trickery.

I remember when you said this about Tyreek Hill last year. How'd that turn out?

Quesadilla Joe 09-28-2017 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13110559)
It's not just scheme.

Spencer Ware wasn't breaking runs like that last year.

He's good. Honestly he reminds me a lot of CJ Anderson...

https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-28-2017/7S31en.gif

kcxiv 09-28-2017 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110555)
It's scheme. Not knocking Hunt, but he's not the next Jim Brown or anything. The big plays will start being less common as teams adjust to the Chiefs' trickery.

ughh, Hunt isnt in involved in the "trickery". lol ****ing people man.

kcxiv 09-28-2017 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13110563)
We're tricking the rest of the NFL by running right up the middle of the defense.

yeah, running off tackle and down the middle. lol No one expects it! lol

CasselGotPeedOn 09-28-2017 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110577)
He's good. Honestly he reminds me a lot of CJ Anderson...

https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-28-2017/7S31en.gif

Except he's way better.

The Franchise 09-28-2017 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110577)
He's good. Honestly he reminds me a lot of CJ Anderson...

https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-28-2017/7S31en.gif

You've got one gif from one game. This dude has been doing it for his first 3 games....so much so that he leads the NFL in broken tackles.

kcxiv 09-28-2017 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn (Post 13110586)
Except he's way better.

in about 3-4 games he should pass CJ Anderson's career high in rushing yards. CJ doesnt even have a 1000 yard season. lol

Quesadilla Joe 09-28-2017 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 13110582)
ughh, Hunt isnt in involved in the "trickery". lol ****ing people man.

No, but he benefits greatly from all the pre-snap motion and post-snap, read-option BS the Chiefs do.

penbrook 09-28-2017 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110594)
No, but he benefits greatly from all the pre-snap motion and post-snap read-option BS the Chiefs do.

That’s why A Smitty is so great!! Second leading QB in fantasy points behind Brady and is a MVP candidate according to HOF Terrell Davis

Quesadilla Joe 09-28-2017 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 13110590)
in about 3-4 games he should pass CJ Anderson's career high in rushing yards. CJ doesnt even have a 1000 yard season. lol

Hopefully his running style doesn't bite him in the ass like CJ's does.

The Franchise 09-28-2017 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbrook (Post 13110597)
That’s why A Smitty is so great!! Second leading QB in fantasy points behind Brady and is a MVP candidate according to HOF Terrell Davis

This is a Kareem Hunt thread. Get the **** out of here with this bullshit.

BleedingRed 09-28-2017 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110600)
Hopefully his running style doesn't bite him in the ass like CJ's does.

Well considering one is ok and the other is amazing I'm not worried

Quesadilla Joe 09-28-2017 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 13110588)
You've got one gif from one game. This dude has been doing it for his first 3 games....so much so that he leads the NFL in broken tackles.

CJ's been doing this for years...

http://bsndenver.com/wp-content/uplo...vs-raiders.gif

Messier 09-28-2017 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110637)

Which one is he there?

BleedingRed 09-28-2017 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110637)

Ooooh wow, look guys he showing us clips from CJ Anderson!

Does it depress you that Hunt has equaled 15% of CJ Andersons career yards in three games?

BossChief 09-28-2017 06:15 PM

CJ Anderson is a ****ing scrub that can't make it through a season.

Get your bullshit out of the thread for the best back in football.

BleedingRed 09-28-2017 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 13110656)
CJ Anderson is a ****ing scrub that can't make it through a season.

Get your bullshit out of the thread for the best back in football.

Yeah at this rate Hunt will pass him in career yards sometime next year....

BleedingRed 09-28-2017 06:16 PM

Crickets

Mr. Kool-aid 09-28-2017 06:40 PM

Anyone have his yards after 1st contact compared to the rest of the league?

Hammock Parties 09-28-2017 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Kool-aid (Post 13110719)
Anyone have his yards after 1st contact compared to the rest of the league?

Need a PFF premium sub. $$$

Hammock Parties 09-28-2017 06:50 PM

Hunt is the top-ranked DVOA RB, though. That means something.

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/rb

Hammock Parties 09-28-2017 06:52 PM

Oh, they dropped this though. He's #1.

Quote:

1. KAREEM HUNT, HB, KANSAS CITY CHIEFS
PFF Grade: 91.9

Elite Stat: Hunt leads all running backs with a 173.0 elusive rating (a runner’s success beyond the point of being helped by his blockers).

Shouldn’t come as a surprise that Hunt has topped this list now for the third consecutive week to start the season. Kansas City’s electric halfback leads all backs in overall grade and his 88.3 rushing grade is also best among his peers. Hunt leads all backs in averaging 4.21 yards after contact per carry and his missed tackle rate of 2.4 (he’s forcing one missed tackle for every 2.4 times he touches the ball) also ranks first as well.

jjchieffan 09-28-2017 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110637)

Show us a clip of Anderson doing that against a team with a real defense. My grandma could get a 50 yard run against the Faiders.

St. Patty's Fire 09-28-2017 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110577)
He's good. Honestly he reminds me a lot of CJ Anderson...

https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-28-2017/7S31en.gif

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/P5iqYuFmzqg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Willie Lanier 09-28-2017 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 13110559)
It's not just scheme.

Spencer Ware wasn't breaking runs like that last year.

Look at this run:

https://i.imgur.com/gnULqLV.gif

"Scheme" failed there.

And this is a good 15 yards after first contact:

https://i.imgur.com/ZlSJxXZ.gif

We haven't seen the combination of leg drive and acceleration like this since LJ.

Arms are for show, legs are for GO

TigeRRUppeRRcut 09-28-2017 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110555)
It's scheme. Not knocking Hunt, but he's not the next Jim Brown or anything. The big plays will start being less common as teams adjust to the Chiefs' trickery.

Trickery? There's no trickery to the play that he burned the Chargers on. He's got great vision, balance, and uses his strides effectively. If linebackers and safeties want to cheat then our receivers and tight ends will abuse them. Pick your poison.

Hater.

Willie Lanier 09-28-2017 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe (Post 13110577)
He's good. Honestly he reminds me a lot of CJ Anderson...

https://i.makeagif.com/media/9-28-2017/7S31en.gif

Keep living in your psychologically detached dream world, I almost feel sorry for you, but withe the clear reality that you possess zero intelligence and yet continue to flaunt that flaw, my empathy meter is running low...

ThaVirus 09-28-2017 09:54 PM

There are literally zero owners, GMs or coaches in the NFL that would take CJ Anderson over Kareem Hunt.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.