ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

ChiefsCountry 09-20-2011 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7928467)
Christ - I would hope that would at least push Auburn over to the East.

It would be like taking Baylor's place in the XII south all of the sudden. OU, OSU, A&M and Bama in the same division? The weak sisters would be Ol' Miss and Mississippi....and Mizzou. Damn that would be nasty.

Hopefully they would push it all the way to the 'pod' setup at that point. I actually like the way the PAC handled that; it looked like it would create a really cool set of rivalries while also ensuring that teams all played each other with some regularity. It would cut down on some of the hellacious travel as well.

We might still end up in a murderous one though, probably OU, OSU, ARK and MU.

It'd be tough as hell, but damn it would be some fun football.

If OU and OSU come along, Bama would be in the east.

West would be Mizzou, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, Arkansas, LSU, A&M, Ole Miss, and Mississippi State.

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 08:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7928467)
It'd be tough as hell, but damn it would be some fun football.

This is the way that I see it. Plus, it would preserve some of the Big 8 (**** you, Big 12) flavor.

And there's little question that your anti-Cassel/Pioli chops demand executive-level membership. I'll raise a Keystone at Reaper's place with you anytime.

DaKCMan AP 09-20-2011 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies (Post 7928232)
I went to Knoxville last year, that stadium is crazy. I'm not a Vols fan, but there's no way that's not one of the top 5 football venues in the world.

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7928234)
Yeah Rocky Top is nuts, and it is crazy to think they are actually in a down period right now.

I've been to Neyland twice. That stadium is gorgeous and enormous. However, despite holding 10,000+ more people than The Swamp, it's not as loud.. at least partially due to the spread-out architecture in contrast with the Swamp's vertical, closed-in build.

KChiefs1 09-20-2011 08:41 PM

http://mizzou2sec.com/sec_14.jpg

DJ's left nut 09-20-2011 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7928509)
This is the way that I see it. Plus, it would preserve some of the Big 8 (**** you, Big 12) flavor.

And there's little question that your anti-Cassel/Pioli chops demand executive-level membership. I'll raise a Keystone at Reaper's place with you anytime.

And the triad is complete. I got rep from Dane and Rainman, and now tacit acceptance into the strange and mysterious gang of 14.

I just burned my Skull and Bones invitation - who the **** needs those guys?

dirk digler 09-20-2011 08:44 PM

**** so we go from having to put up with whiny KU fans to possibly DaKCMan.

Just shoot me now...


:)

DaKCMan AP 09-20-2011 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 7928592)
**** so we go from having to put up with whiny KU fans to possibly DaKCMan.

Just shoot me now...


:)

Maybe you all will STFU about me pimping the Awesome SEC and talking about Florida.


...probably not. ;)

'Hamas' Jenkins 09-20-2011 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7928506)
If OU and OSU come along, Bama would be in the east.

West would be Mizzou, Oklahoma, Oklahoma St, Arkansas, LSU, A&M, Ole Miss, and Mississippi State.

That's a balanced, but brutal division. In basketball, Mizzou could probably win that division with regularity if Carlton doesn't **** it up.

dirk digler 09-20-2011 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 7928599)
Maybe you all will STFU about me pimping the Awesome SEC and talking about Florida.


...probably not. ;)

I am already getting tired of you... :D

bobbymitch 09-20-2011 08:57 PM

Perhaps some here can help an old codger understand how teams travel.

Back in the days of the Big 8 (yep went to school during that period), bus travel was the means of getting teams around. But, say, MU goes to the SEC. What are they going to do? Fly or spend several days to get to Florida? Can't fly from Columbia directly.

The same goes for KU, KSU, & ISU should the Big 12 goes down the tubes and they wind up in some eastern league.

I understand the PAC 10 does something to go to SoCal to Seattle, but never gave it much thought on the travel arragngements.

DJ's left nut 09-20-2011 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 7928610)
That's a balanced, but brutal division. In basketball, Mizzou could probably win that division with regularity if Carlton doesn't **** it up.

Damn - all the talk about football and I completely spaced on basketball.

Yeah - Mizzou should do pretty well in basketball if we can manage to get ourselves a decent coach after shitcanning Haith.

(Unfortunately, it certainly appears that he's survived the Miami thing, so it'll take 3 or 4 mediocre seasons first...)

Reaper16 09-20-2011 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7928509)
This is the way that I see it. Plus, it would preserve some of the Big 8 (**** you, Big 12) flavor.

And there's little question that your anti-Cassel/Pioli chops demand executive-level membership. I'll raise a Keystone at Reaper's place with you anytime.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7928583)
And the triad is complete. I got rep from Dane and Rainman, and now tacit acceptance into the strange and mysterious gang of 14.

I just burned my Skull and Bones invitation - who the **** needs those guys?

I've got Tecate in my fridge right now that y'all can have. Also some High Life.

No, seriously, they are really in there. Please come down and drink them for me.

dirk digler 09-20-2011 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7928635)
Damn - all the talk about football and I completely spaced on basketball.

Yeah - Mizzou should do pretty well in basketball if we can manage to get ourselves a decent coach after shitcanning Haith.

(Unfortunately, it certainly appears that he's survived the Miami thing, so it'll take 3 or 4 mediocre seasons first...)

Yep. Football is going to be brutal and we will be lucky to be in the top half of the conference but basketball we should be near the top. Of course we will have replaced our annual rapings by KU with Kentucky.

Mosbonian 09-20-2011 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 7928646)
Yep. Football is going to be brutal and we will be lucky to be in the top half of the conference but basketball we should be near the top. Of course we will have replaced our annual rapings by KU with Kentucky.

Yeah...but some of us wouldn't have to travel so far to see an occasional football or basketball game.

ChiefsCountry 09-20-2011 09:14 PM

Well the PAC-12 isn't expanding
http://twitter.com/#!/PeteThamelNYT/...48494758936577

Pants 09-20-2011 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 7928679)

Sooooo Texas is going to do what?

tk13 09-20-2011 09:21 PM

That explains OU and Texas' sudden desire to save the conference. Maybe it's the right move, maybe it's not, but if I was Mizzou I would run, run, and run.

Bewbies 09-20-2011 09:23 PM

I hope Texas ends up with nowhere to go.

DJ's left nut 09-20-2011 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7928685)
Sooooo Texas is going to do what?

Shit.

You know exactly what Texas is going to do now - the same thing they've always done.

If the PAC doesn't expand, OU probably stays in the XII with the rest of the gang. If so, Deaton's not going to pull the trigger on this thing.

If the PAC doesn't expand, I don't think MU moves. There are too many people within this administration that are entirely too resistant to change.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 7928694)
That explains OU and Texas' sudden desire to save the conference. Maybe it's the right move, maybe it's not, but if I was Mizzou I would run, run, and run.

I wonder if this makes everyone put their guns back in their holsters though.

Reaper16 09-20-2011 09:28 PM

Mizzou should threaten to go unless Texas drops the LHN and stops being such a douche.

tk13 09-20-2011 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928705)
I wonder if this makes everyone put their guns back in their holsters though.

Might be. Or OU might be trying to buy time to talk to the SEC. Sure seems like too many lines have been crossed to just go back to being ruled by Texas.

alnorth 09-20-2011 09:33 PM

I've had to put up with Mizzou fans all day (not on this board, but I need to vent) bragging about how they are going to the SEC and how they are so gleeful that Kansas would get left behind in the leftover conference. Lots of mockery all day long.

All I have to say is: suck it, Mizzou. You are a proud member of the Big 12 conference.

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7928703)
Shit.

You know exactly what Texas is going to do now - the same thing they've always done.

If the PAC doesn't expand, OU probably stays in the XII with the rest of the gang. If so, Deaton's not going to pull the trigger on this thing.

If the PAC doesn't expand, I don't think MU moves. There are too many people within this administration that are entirely too resistant to change.

And it will absolutely be the wrong decision. FML. And we'll have to, again, hear all of the bullshit about preserving tradition, rivalries, blah, blah, ****ing, blah.

While we wait for the big boys to kick us out of bed again.

Wake up, you spineless ****s. Get the **** out while (if) you can. End the ****ing charade. If this means paying a penalty, so be it. There's plenty of money in Columbia to write the check.

KC_Connection 09-20-2011 09:40 PM

So after all that, the Big 12 stays intact? Who the hell are these people that run college football? LMAO

eazyb81 09-20-2011 09:43 PM

How hilarious would it be if we all just wasted the last 3 months following this crap and nothing happened?

kcfan82 09-20-2011 09:43 PM

Where is Mizzou going to go?

I thought that their offer was contingent on the Big 12 folding.

tk13 09-20-2011 09:44 PM

The real funny thing is out of all of this, the real winner is Colorado. They just stuck it to both Texas and OU.

But I'm not 100% convinced it's all over. Is Oklahoma really going to walk back with their tail between their legs?

|Zach| 09-20-2011 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection (Post 7928733)
So after all that, the Big 12 stays intact? Who the hell are these people that run college football? LMAO

Well, I don't think that is set and if it is for how long? You think we are not doing this same dance in less than a year?

The Big 12 is not sustainable. Too many lines crossed.

alnorth 09-20-2011 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcfan82 (Post 7928742)
Where is Mizzou going to go?

I thought that their offer was contingent on the Big 12 folding.

Mizzou is a proud member of the Big XII conference. We'll probably add 1 or 3 teams and call it a day.

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 09:45 PM

No idea why Mizzou fans would expect (or hope) for forward-thinking leadership from the current administration, as if BD didn't completely embarrass himself during the Anderson hire and Big 10 fiasco.

No way that the SEC doesn't go to 14. Have the gumption to make the move solo.

alnorth 09-20-2011 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 7928744)
The real funny thing is out of all of this, the real winner is Colorado. They just stuck it to both Texas and OU.

But I'm not 100% convinced it's all over. Is Oklahoma really going to walk back with their tail between their legs?

Where will OU go?

eazyb81 09-20-2011 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcfan82 (Post 7928742)
Where is Mizzou going to go?

I thought that their offer was contingent on the Big 12 folding.

It is. Mizzou goes nowhere without OU leaving, which is why no one was really throwing a parade on here yet.

Saulbadguy 09-20-2011 09:48 PM

hook 'em

tk13 09-20-2011 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7928750)
Where will OU go?

Anywhere else. If they truly feel everything is tilted against them and they'll never have a competitive advantage because Texas has their own network... it's better to get out now before you become the Blue Jays of the Big 12.

The only thing we do know is the SEC needs a 14th team. Somebody has to do it. And I am not convinced they'd want it to be West Virginia.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 09:49 PM

Remember when Kathy Bates crushed Jimmy Caan's feet with a sledgehammer to trap him in bed? There's a Texas-Big 12 analogy there somewhere

http://twitter.com/#!/Dave_Matter/st...57241937989633

|Zach| 09-20-2011 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7928749)
No idea why Mizzou fans would expect (or hope) for forward-thinking leadership from the current administration, as if BD didn't completely embarrass himself during the Anderson hire and Big 10 fiasco.

No way that the SEC doesn't go to 14. Have the gumption to make the move solo.

Seems like move to SEC hinged on B12 imploding.

Frazod 09-20-2011 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81 (Post 7928740)
How hilarious would it be if we all just wasted the last 3 months following this crap and nothing happened?

Wouldn't surprise me. I learned my lesson last year. Hopeful it works but fully prepared for it to all go swirling down the drain.

007 09-20-2011 09:54 PM

Well, if this is true I am really going to miss the yearly rivalry. Sucks.

kcfan82 09-20-2011 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7928747)
Mizzou is a proud member of the Big XII conference. We'll probably add 1 or 3 teams and call it a day.

Doesn't sound like a bad deal to me.

A) The Big 12 picks up another school and they all (minue A&M) split a 1+ billion dollar contract.

B) Missouri gets to duke it out with OSU for third in command now.

jAZ 09-20-2011 09:55 PM

From my source...

"It was a done deal until things got messy and difficult.* Even Scott, the biggest proponent of the superconferences did not think he could make this work seemlessly.* I just spoke to a well placed Pac Ten official who told me that the expanded league would have been as messy as the Big 12 has been with big egos and the desire for special status.* The presidents who were on board as of last week were turned off by having to compromise to add schools they wanted (OU and UT) and were not thrilled with having to take OSU and TTech.* So instead of humiliating anybody with a rejection, they just decided to stand pat until this thing blows up again in a couple of years.* The Big 12 survives again. For now while the Pac 12 will flourish as 12."

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928761)
Seems like move to SEC hinged on B12 imploding.

And who is the 14th in the SEC?

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 09:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 7928770)
From my source...

"It was a done deal until things got messy and difficult.* Even Scott, the biggest proponent of the superconferences did not think he could make this work seemlessly.* I just spoke to a well placed Pac Ten official who told me that the expanded league would have been as messy as the Big 12 has been with big egos and the desire for special status.* The presidents who were on board as of last week were turned off by having to compromise to add schools they wanted (OU and UT) and were not thrilled with having to take OSU and TTech.* So instead of humiliating anybody with a rejection, they just decided to stand pat until this thing blows up again in a couple of years.* The Big 12 survives again. For now while the Pac 12 will flourish as 12."

:facepalm:

|Zach| 09-20-2011 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7928772)
And who is the 14th in the SEC?

Hey who knows...not saying Missouri can't or won't be...but I think this is new information...so it is back to the drawing board a bit.

I feel like one huge thing is...nobody wants to be the one to really pull that last jenga block to make the B12 fold. Legally and just for the sake of a lot of bullshit I think people want B12 teams without being blamed for burning the house down.

Say MU were to be invited and leave with Texas and OU and all the other teams staying to keep the B12 going. That can happen without people thinking you wrecked the B12 but then again...that is new...we didn't think about this.

Did you?

I think you are coming down on a varied a constantly changing situation with a ton of assumptions.

How you take all this info and go. "Mizzou was invited to the SEC...they had the golden ticket and said no!" out of all these ups and downs and turns seems kinda silly to me.

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928782)
Hey who knows...not saying Missouri can't or won't be...but I think this is new information...so it is back to the drawing board a bit.

I feel like one huge thing is...nobody wants to be the one to really pull that last jenga block to make the B12 fold. Legally and just for the sake of a lot of bullshit I think people want B12 teams without being blamed for burning the house down.

Say MU were to be invited and leave with Texas and OU and all the other teams staying to keep the B12 going. That can happen without people thinking you wrecked the B12 but then again...that is new...we didn't think about this.

Did you?

I think you are coming down on a varied a constantly changing situation with a ton of assumptions.

How you take all this info and go. "Mizzou was invited to the SEC...they had the golden ticket and said no!" out of all these ups and downs and turns seems kinda silly to me.

Logistically, the Pac-12 would have been problematic for midwest teams, no question.

I don't think it's assumptions, however, to say that BD has been involved in some very damning incidents at Mizzou that cast serious doubt on the level of leadership.

alnorth 09-20-2011 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jAZ (Post 7928770)
From my source...

"It was a done deal until things got messy and difficult.* Even Scott, the biggest proponent of the superconferences did not think he could make this work seemlessly.* I just spoke to a well placed Pac Ten official who told me that the expanded league would have been as messy as the Big 12 has been with big egos and the desire for special status.* The presidents who were on board as of last week were turned off by having to compromise to add schools they wanted (OU and UT) and were not thrilled with having to take OSU and TTech.* So instead of humiliating anybody with a rejection, they just decided to stand pat until this thing blows up again in a couple of years.* The Big 12 survives again. For now while the Pac 12 will flourish as 12."

This feels right to me.

If OU would have gone to the PAC 12 alone and said "screw OSU, we'd like to apply to your conference, no strings attached. We'll be an equal member, we'll assimilate into the PAC 12 culture and be a team player", I bet they would have got in. Ditto UT.

LiveSteam 09-20-2011 10:03 PM

Is Dan Bebee still employed?

Pants 09-20-2011 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928782)
Hey who knows...not saying Missouri can't or won't be...but I think this is new information...so it is back to the drawing board a bit.

I feel like one huge thing is...nobody wants to be the one to really pull that last jenga block to make the B12 fold. Legally and just for the sake of a lot of bullshit I think people want B12 teams without being blamed for burning the house down.

Say MU were to be invited and leave with Texas and OU and all the other teams staying to keep the B12 going. That can happen without people thinking you wrecked the B12 but then again...that is new...we didn't think about this.

Did you?

I think you are coming down on a varied a constantly changing situation with a ton of assumptions.

How you take all this info and go. "Mizzou was invited to the SEC...they had the golden ticket and said no!" out of all these ups and downs and turns seems kinda silly to me.

You guys really need to get the **** out while you can. I hate MU with a passion, but I know if that was KU with a chance to jet, I would want them to.

KC_Connection 09-20-2011 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928745)
Well, I don't think that is set and if it is for how long? You think we are not doing this same dance in less than a year?

The Big 12 is not sustainable. Too many lines crossed.

This apparent conclusion is why I stopped following the rumors. Too much is complete BS.

Texas is going to have to find a hell of an opportunity to want to fold a conference that they control.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7928791)
You guys really need to get the **** out while you can. I hate MU with a passion, but I know if that was KU with a chance to jet, I would want them to.

Ha, yes but that is the thing. People always slam Missouri for not making things happen that simply and frustratingly are not all up to their control.

We will see how it pans out. The last 30 hours of news have been unreal.

Pants 09-20-2011 10:07 PM

Having said that, this is absolutely my favorite scenario for KU by far. Add 3 Big East teams, make the exit fees so ****ing high nobody will want to do it for a long time and lets roll.

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 10:09 PM

No idea why any university would be worried about hearing some bullshit about being the institution that "blew up the Big 12" when anyone with a grain of common sense realizes that this conference is and will be hemorrhaging blood until the death blow comes in the near future.

tk13 09-20-2011 10:10 PM

Pete Thamel is saying it came down to Texas. There wasn't even a legit conference call. Larry Scott had basically decided that there was no way they were going to appease Texas and keep everything equal... hence the "culture of equality" statement.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7928802)
No idea why any university would be worried about hearing some bullshit about being the institution that "blew up the Big 12" when anyone with a grain of common sense realizes that this conference is and will be hemorrhaging blood until the death blow comes in the near future.

http://goods4girls.org/wp-content/up...06/Lawyers.png

KC_Connection 09-20-2011 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 7928757)
Anywhere else. If they truly feel everything is tilted against them and they'll never have a competitive advantage because Texas has their own network... it's better to get out now before you become the Blue Jays of the Big 12.

I like the analogy.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 7928804)
Pete Thamel is saying it came down to Texas. There wasn't even a legit conference call. Larry Scott had basically decided that there was no way they were going to appease Texas and keep everything equal... hence the "culture of equality" statement.

That makes sense.

Pants 09-20-2011 10:11 PM

Next time Dan Beebee and Oklahoma are in the same room:

So... That was awkward.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7928810)
Next time Dan Beebee and Oklahoma are in the same room:

So... That was awkward.

But here is the thing. It is all awkward...everyone...all of it.

I wouldn't...the whole thing.

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928806)

Write. The. Check.

As you well know, there's insane money in Columbia and otherwise associated with the university. Bit of short-term pain for long-term gain.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:12 PM

B12 expansion? L'ville, Cincy, WVU. Not perfect but available...and better than some horse shit smaller Texas schools.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 7928814)
Write. The. Check.

As you well know, there's insane money in Columbia and associated with the university. Bit of short-term pain for long-term gain.

Ok so I was coming from a different direction.

I don't mean the team leaving take heat for being a conference killer (in MU's case they wouldn't be a conference killer) but more so I don't think the conference taking in a number of teams wants to look they were the ones that flipped the switch,

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 10:16 PM

Fair point, Zach.

KC_Connection 09-20-2011 10:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928815)
B12 expansion? L'ville, Cincy, WVU. Not perfect but available...and better than some horse shit smaller Texas schools.

If it was those three, that would be great for basketball. Not so sure that the BE can't survive, though.

Pitt Gorilla 09-20-2011 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928815)
B12 expansion? L'ville, Cincy, WVU. Not perfect but available...and better than some horse shit smaller Texas schools.

**** NO. GET THE **** OUT. I don't care if everyone is pissed, MU needs to leave yesterday.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:20 PM

Unlikely idea but hey we are throwing out shit right? As many stupid crazy things as we have talked about we still haven't been close.

A&M, MU, OU, OSU ---> SEC at 16.

I don't mind an expanded B12 at face value but....there is no way to believe it is sustainable...even with good ideas.

Brock 09-20-2011 10:20 PM

So, not a damn thing is going to happen now?

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 7928830)
**** NO. GET THE **** OUT. I don't care if everyone is pissed, MU needs to leave yesterday.

Haha, hey I agree...I am just throwing stuff out.

However...here is then deal...Missouri can't just go somewhere if someone is not inviting them. We don't know the actual level of interest now it conferences wanting to take on other teams.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 7928832)
So, not a damn thing is going to happen now?

Seems like a lot is still going to happen.

Pitt Gorilla 09-20-2011 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7928835)
Haha, hey I agree...I am just throwing stuff out.

However...here is then deal...Missouri can't just go somewhere if someone is not inviting them. We don't know the actual level of interest now it conferences wanting to take on other teams.

True. But Deaton needs to resign as Big 12 whateverthefheis. Right now, he's not helping MU. We need a Kroenke or three with their lawyers to represent Mizzou.

KC_Connection 09-20-2011 10:25 PM

tullycorcoran
Have this on a loop as you read your conference realignment stories: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnHmskwqCCQ

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla (Post 7928839)
True. But Deaton needs to resign as Big 12 whateverthefheis. Right now, he's not helping MU. We need a Kroenke or three with their lawyers to represent Mizzou.

I think people make too much of all that but its a fair point. I wouldn't be against it.

But when you try and do bold things you leave yourself open to risk. Nobody is going to change that.

|Zach| 09-20-2011 10:32 PM

Boren saying he wasn't surprised by PAC decision and reiterates support for B12

Reaper16 09-20-2011 10:34 PM

Big 12 staying alive = good for Kansas City = I'm pretty happy

ChiefsCountry 09-20-2011 10:35 PM

Add BYU to the South and Louisville & Cincinnati to the North.

or

Move OU and OSU to the North and add BYU, New Mexico, and TCU to the South.

alnorth 09-20-2011 10:35 PM

tweet from an AP writer

Quote:

Big 12 source tells AP #Texas and OU officials to meet in next few days to negotiate deal that keeps both in league five years.

alnorth 09-20-2011 10:37 PM

Jon Wilner (well-respected PAC-12 beat writer)

Quote:

9:10 p.m. update: Been on the phone for last 30 minutes. Here’s why league did not expand, in a nutshell:

It determined that a 14-school conference was awkward and it would not bow to Texas’ revenue demands.

According to a source, Larry Scott walked away from weekend meeting with Texas knowing the Longhorn Network and the Pac-12 revenue model could not work together.

It was zero or four and the four was too problematic — no interest in meeting UT’s revenue demands — so it’s at zero, which is where the CEOs wanted to be all along.

tk13 09-20-2011 10:37 PM

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...gnment-bigeast

All the Big East football presidents and AD's met tonight... all agreed to stay together and look for replacements for Syracuse and Pitt. Non-football schools all seem to be on board.

Dante84 09-20-2011 10:38 PM

I don't know why the Big 12 is getting picked apart. We are(were) a stronger conference than the ACC, Big East, etc... Why aren't those getting blown up?

Obviously the ego of UT has been a turn off. It is in the best interest for UT to concede an inch and retain power in the Big 12, than to concede a mile to join another conference and be an equal player in another conference.

All OU is asking for is that High School games/highlights not be shown on LHN. All the remaining teams want is a more equal slice of the pie.

If UT can concede an inch, which they eventually will, IMO, since its the best option for them at this point, then everyone in the Big 12 should breathe a sigh of relief....

And then go ****ing rape some other conference/s out of 3-7 teams.

kcfan82 09-20-2011 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 7928860)
Big 12 staying alive = good for Kansas City = I'm pretty happy

It would be shitty to lose the Big 12 basketball tournament and have all of the schools disperse throughout the coasts.

DeezNutz 09-20-2011 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 7928862)
tweet from an AP writer

Thank you, daddies, for allowing the rest of us to humbly be a part of your conference for the next five years. I never wanted any other daddy than you.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.