Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 16885392)

You're trying too hard

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 16886128)

Is this another version of Ronda Rousey would beat Floyd Mayweather?

There's a reason why men and women sports are separate. There's a reason why transgender men are smashing women records. Caitlin Clark would not hang in a mens league. Stop that bullshit.

I've never seen her play and dont care to see her play, but I have no problem saying she could hang better than most women against men. That's just a fact, if she is as good at basketball as people in this thread say, but it's a fact against men in general. We aren't talking about men in general. We are talking about men that are as good in their sport comparatively to Caitlin in hers, a sport that is far superior in athletism, size, and power. She would get smashed in a mens league.

Even the best WNBA players understand they wouldn't win against even the worst bench player in the NBA. As soon as the NBA gets tired of paying the salaries of players for a league that is losing millions of dollars year after year, the WNBA wont exist.

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 16886134)

Why are you this miserable and take sports so serious?

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 16886128)

Is this another version of Ronda Rousey would beat Floyd Mayweather?

There's a reason why men and women sports are separate. There's a reason why transgender men are smashing women records. Caitlin Clark would not hang in a mens league. Stop that bullshit.

I've never seen her play and dont care to see her play, but I have no problem saying she could hang better than most women against men. That's just a fact, if she is as good at basketball as people in this thread say, but it's a fact against men in general. We aren't talking about men in general. We are talking about men that are as good in their sport comparatively to Caitlin in hers, a sport that is far superior in athletism, size, and power. She would get smashed in a mens league.

Even the best WNBA players understand they wouldn't win against even the worst bench player in the NBA. As soon as the NBA gets tired of paying the salaries of players for a league that is losing millions of dollars year after year, the WNBA wont exist.

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 16885898)

It wasn’t disrespectful. If they allowed SC to play their game they get blown out. They defended the paint and tried to force SC to beat them outside which they couldn’t do. Teams do that all the time in all sports.

Originally Posted by BWillie (Post 16886008)

Notice I was responding to a poster who said that nobody on this message board could beat her one on one...which is doubtful unless nobody played ball in high school. But its possible since this is a pretty old demographic in this board. Please. Remain calm. Everything is going to be alright.

Originally Posted by Chiefspants (Post 16886195)

This argument always devolves into some form of "well, college women couldn't compete with college men, so why watch?"

So, if that's the standard, why would any person watch college sports when college teams would always get wiped away by their professional counterparts?

I admitted earlier in the thread that the FF game was the most I've ever watched of women's hoops. But hell, it was a lot of fun. Clark is just a generational talent in WCBB and I had fun watching the game and watching her will her team against an undefeated opponent. Why does the conversation always have to go to "WELL MARKQUIS NOWELL WOULD KICK HER ASS"

Originally Posted by KCUnited (Post 16886212)

Originally Posted by TwistedChief (Post 16886186)

I love how you continue to think that any male high school basketball player under the age of 38 could "mop the floor with her" and somehow now that's morphed into some absurdity that I'm arguing that she could hang with D1 men's athletes.