ChiefsPlanet
Page 9 of 88 « First 5678 9 101112131959 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs BREAKING: Nick Foles starting against Jags (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=303330)

The Franchise 11-02-2016 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 12523806)
I asked this in another thread as well.
I don't think it was a Reid decision. I think this was a Smith decision.

Simply Red 11-02-2016 11:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12523813)
I don't think it was a Reid decision. I think this was a Smith decision.
& that's fine I think

PAChiefsGuy 11-02-2016 11:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12523805)
I fully disagree that it's a "bad look".

Everyone that watched the Colts game thought he was concussed, not once, but twice. He should never have been allowed to re-enter the game. I don't care if he passed one or both tests, it was clear that he wasn't 100% healthy and refs didn't give shit. They failed to call a penalty in either case, which left him as a sitting duck for further injury.

IMO, he should take a week, two weeks or even three weeks to get healthy. It's his long term health that's at stake and he should be afforded every opportunity to get healthy before subjecting his brain to further trauma.
I gotta agree with Dane that there is no rush to get Smith back. Foles is a capable back up and those hits on Smith did not look good. He looked totally out of it.

Give the guy time to get healthy and lets roll with Foles in the meantime. If Smith starts having a lot of concussions it could be his career.

Ming the Merciless 11-02-2016 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12523813)
I don't think it was a Reid decision. I think this was a Smith decision.
you would have to think so

smith/personal doctor/family/wife

good for him IMO...he needs to take care of #1 ...He has a mountain of cash...and a bangin ass wife...what good is all that if his brains get scrambled?

ptlyon 11-02-2016 11:51 AM
Roll the tape of Days of Thunder where Nichole Kidman tells Cole "You're scared Cole, you're scared"

Simply Red 11-02-2016 11:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12523819)
you would have to think so

smith/personal doctor/family/wife

good for him IMO...he needs to take care of #1 ...He has a mountain of cash...and a bangin ass wife...what good is all that if his brains get scrambled?

His wife seemed nice on Twitter.

Predarat 11-02-2016 11:52 AM
Not a bad get for a 1 week Fantasy Football bye week/injury replacement fix.

ptlyon 11-02-2016 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12523819)
you would have to think so

smith/personal doctor/family/wife

good for him IMO...he needs to take care of #1 ...He has a mountain of cash...and a bangin ass wife...what good is all that if his brains get scrambled?
Yet another QB that ripped off the Chiefs over the years

O.city 11-02-2016 11:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12523805)
I fully disagree that it's a "bad look".

Everyone that watched the Colts game thought he was concussed, not once, but twice. He should never have been allowed to re-enter the game. I don't care if he passed one or both tests, it was clear that he wasn't 100% healthy and refs didn't give shit. They failed to call a penalty in either case, which left him as a sitting duck for further injury.

IMO, he should take a week, two weeks or even three weeks to get healthy. It's his long term health that's at stake and he should be afforded every opportunity to get healthy before subjecting his brain to further trauma.
If the independent neurologists passed him to go back and play, I don't see how it's on the officials or the team to make that call.

If he's hurt, fine, don't play. But coming out and saying he's symptom free makes it look bad.

Mr. Plow 11-02-2016 11:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12523738)
Remind me what the team total yards was for that game?

Thanks for the humor kid
KC had 326 yards against NO (214 passing) & then they had 422 yards (334 passing) against the Colts. What point are you trying to prove? They are equally shitty defenses.

Frosty 11-02-2016 11:54 AM
After reading this tread, I now have a mashup of "Breakdown" and "Royals" stuck in my head. :cuss:

PAChiefsGuy 11-02-2016 11:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASS11 (Post 12523755)
A paltry 326 yards.

The lowest total the Saints have allowed all season.
Who cares? The object is to win the game not gain the most total yds.

Stick to fantasy football man. You obviously only care about stats.

O.city 11-02-2016 11:56 AM
In general, stats are gonna lead to more points. More points equal more wins.

The Pats win a shitload and have a shitload of yards and points. It's not an either or situation.

Fish 11-02-2016 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower (Post 12523819)
you would have to think so

smith/personal doctor/family/wife

good for him IMO...he needs to take care of #1 ...He has a mountain of cash...and a bangin ass wife...what good is all that if his brains get scrambled?
If that's the case, I can't blame him. But I don't want my starting QB playing scared worrying about injury when he's not injured.

Mr. Plow 11-02-2016 11:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy (Post 12523836)
Who cares? The object is to win the game not gain the most total yds.

Stick to fantasy football man. You obviously only care about stats.
Ahh, you like an offense that can move the ball & score.....you must be only interested in fantasy football!!!11!1!!1!!


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 PM.
Page 9 of 88 « First 5678 9 101112131959 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.