ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Oakland will be more competitive than the Chiefs next year (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=289138)

scho63 12-17-2014 05:17 AM

It would be real easy for Harbaugh to join the Raiders without having to move his family or change his life.

Not sure what it would take and after him having problems with the front office, not sure Oakland makes sense in that respect.

It would be a big coup for Oakland to get him.

Window Licking Whiner 12-17-2014 05:29 AM

Oakland will be more competitive than the Chiefs next year
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave (Post 11197725)
Dumbass


You seem nice.


Just in time for Christmas, season ticket renewals make great Christmas presents. Act before Christmas and get a autographed Alex Smith 2015 Chiefs Calendar.

You know you are going to meatball.

BigMeatballDave 12-17-2014 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gopack_vag (Post 11197732)
You seem nice.


Just in time for Christmas, season ticket renewals make great Christmas presents. Act before Christmas and get a autographed Alex Smith 2015 Chiefs Calendar.

You know you are going to meatball.

Sure, when they start playing in Ohio, maybe.

HemiEd 12-17-2014 07:42 AM

I feel smarter after reading this thread.

Dartgod 12-17-2014 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inmem58 (Post 11190066)

So, by your logic, Carr > Rodgers?

:thumb:

splatbass 12-17-2014 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gopack_vag (Post 11197714)
If by declining you mean home field advantage in every playoff he's been in since going to denver, 1 superbowl appearence, 3 back to back to back playoff appearances, twice considered NFL MVP, and overall pwnage of the Chiefs at home and in Denver...sure I guess he is declining.

Btw that declining quarterback has won more in 3 years then the chiefs have in 40. think about that. If that's declining, then maybe that's what the chiefs need

Manning is 39 years old, and it is starting to show. He doesn't have the zip on his passes that he did even a year ago. At this age he will decline fast. He will still have the advantage of being great at reading defenses and adjusting to them but there will come a time, and it won't be long, before that isn't enough.

kcchiefsus 12-17-2014 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splatbass (Post 11197834)
Manning is 39 years old, and it is starting to show. He doesn't have the zip on his passes that he did even a year ago. At this age he will decline fast. He will still have the advantage of being great at reading defenses and adjusting to them but there will come a time, and it won't be long, before that isn't enough.

Wouldn't be out of the question to have a dramatic drop-off from one season tot he next. Take Brett Favre for example. His first year in Minnesota he threw for 33 touchdowns and 7 interceptions. The very next year he threw for 11 touchdowns and 19 interceptions.

Can't say I'm not hoping for a similar drop-off for Manning ASAP. Would love for him to come back for another season and his production just fall off a cliff and for the Donkeys to still not know what they have in Osweiller.

Window Licking Whiner 12-17-2014 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baby Lee (Post 11190042)
Wonder how many times this exact thread has been posted the past 15 years.

SSDY

sooner or later one of them has to hit though right?

Brock 12-17-2014 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jdubya (Post 11197664)
Dennis Allen stayed for 2 1/2 years of his 3 year contract. That is much longer than Al would have kept him. Again, he was just a stop gap coach while the Raiders decimated their roster of high salaries/contracts until Reggie McKenzie got the salary cap in order. Not even Lombardi would have won more games for the Raiders the first 2 years after Al died.

I hate to break the news, but there was no point to firing Dennis Allen at that point. It's just another case of the team laying blame on somebody for their own ****ed up decision making, business as usual in Oakland.. Nothing's changed, unless you think letting Tony Sparano dog-paddle around out there serves some insane purpose.

Just Passin' By 12-17-2014 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gopack_vag (Post 11197714)
If by declining you mean home field advantage in every playoff he's been in since going to denver, 1 superbowl appearence, 3 back to back to back playoff appearances, twice considered NFL MVP, and overall pwnage of the Chiefs at home and in Denver...sure I guess he is declining.

Btw that declining quarterback has won more in 3 years then the chiefs have in 40. think about that. If that's declining, then maybe that's what the chiefs need


Team v. individual


Manning's clearly been declining. If it's because of an undisclosed injury, then maybe he'll be back up to snuff next year, and the league can bitch about the injury rules again. Only time will tell us on that.

jdubya 12-17-2014 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 11198165)
I hate to break the news, but there was no point to firing Dennis Allen at that point. It's just another case of the team laying blame on somebody for their own ****ed up decision making, business as usual in Oakland.. Nothing's changed, unless you think letting Tony Sparano dog-paddle around out there serves some insane purpose.

You may be 100% correct. Time will tell

jdubya 12-17-2014 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By (Post 11198179)
Team v. individual


Manning's clearly been declining. If it's because of an undisclosed injury, then maybe he'll be back up to snuff next year, and the league can bitch about the injury rules again. Only time will tell us on that.

I agree, Manning does not have the arm to zip his passes anywhere but on calm days or indoors. His game is faltering noticeably in cold or windy conditions….this is why I state the Doncs window is closing rapidly

Jiu Jitsu Jon 12-17-2014 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 11196895)
I'm sorry... but no.

First of all, you guys are assuming that Harbaugh is a lock to go there and secondly, you guys are assuming that he's going to be some HOF candidate even if he does go there.

If he shows up in Oakland, he's has a TON of bad contracts to eat and washed up players to ditch before he can start remaking the roster in his image. Not to mention just the simple facts of installing a new system top to bottom and trying to create a new culture in that dump.

Nah, they wont be jack squat for a while even if he goes there...that team is the ultimate fixer-upper/long term project.

They'll eat 5.5 mil next year when they let Schaub go. Based on current contracts, a rough estimate has the Raiders at 52 mil under the cap in 2015.

TimBone 12-17-2014 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jiu Jitsu Jon (Post 11199807)
They'll eat 5.5 mil next year when they let Schaub go. Based on current contracts, a rough estimate has the Raiders at 52 mil under the cap in 2015.

Well that's good, because the roster is a bag of shit.

R8RFAN 12-18-2014 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBone (Post 11199870)
Well that's good, because the roster is a bag of shit.

That bag o shit kicked your ass LMAO


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.