ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Andy Reid (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=265232)

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9023187)
Do you agree that getting a qb and developing him is this teams top requirement going forward?

No.

If you're taking a guy number one or two overall, he had better be 95% developed. At that point, it's the offensive coaching staff's responsibility to put the QB in a favorable position.

College QB's recently have proven that they don't need development, they need NFL experience.

DaneMcCloud 10-17-2012 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9023177)
Chud.

Cam Newton and Carolina have taken a huge step backward this season.

I don't see him as a head coaching candidate.

Rausch 10-17-2012 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9023212)
Cam Newton and Carolina have taken a huge step backward this season.

I don't see him as a head coaching candidate.

Stupidity is incurable.

I don't care how good a lion trainer you are you're still just a dumb-**** that thinks he can make lions do what he wants...

Fritz88 10-17-2012 01:29 AM

As OC.
Posted via Mobile Device

Rausch 10-17-2012 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 9023294)
As OC.
Posted via Mobile Device

This...

AussieChiefsFan 10-17-2012 01:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88 (Post 9023294)
As OC.
Posted via Mobile Device

:hmmm:

ClevelandBronco 10-17-2012 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 9023204)
Has it not been the last 40 years?...

And that's why they didn't do it. I mean, that guy would be like 62 years old now (even older if he was a Mormon, I suppose), and how many guys in their sixties have been successful quarterbacks in the NFL? The Chiefs actually dodged a bullet in that one. Smart personnel move.

BossChief 10-17-2012 01:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9023208)
No.

If you're taking a guy number one or two overall, he had better be 95% developed. At that point, it's the offensive coaching staff's responsibility to put the QB in a favorable position.

College QB's recently have proven that they don't need development, they need NFL experience.

Well, Im sorry that you dont see that its possible the coaches they all got matched up with played a big role into how they were able to transition so quickly.

RG3 has Shannahan
Luck has Arians.
Tannehill has his college coach

Rausch 10-17-2012 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClevelandBronco (Post 9023307)
And that's why they didn't do it. I mean, that guy would be like 62 years old now (even older if he was a Mormon, I suppose), and how many guys in their sixties have been successful quarterbacks in the NFL? The Chiefs actually dodged a bullet in that one. Smart personnel move.

Not funny.

Plus random disrespectful comments about your family and things carnivores should do to your more protected parts...

spanky 52 10-17-2012 04:48 AM

No thanks. If we were to have a new regime, I'd hope they'd get a younger guy, somebody not in the good old boy network.

jspchief 10-17-2012 06:35 AM

I have no idea why people are trying to defend Reid's commitment to the run. He has a decade plus of undervaluing running the ball, regardless of what this year's current ratio is.

FRCDFED 10-17-2012 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bowener (Post 9020388)
When Norv Turner is fired, who would like him as OC?

This...count me in!

Chief Gump 10-17-2012 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiTown (Post 9020089)

I can't quit laughing... ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.