ChiefsPlanet
Page 9 of 22 « First 5678 9 1011121319 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Stafford or Sanchez? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200332)

milkman 01-14-2009 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5391437)
His numbers this season would beg to differ.
He's improved from year to year, but he was still making questionable decisions.

Deberg_1990 01-14-2009 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5391427)
He thinks that we're going to end up trading down and picking up a QB next year.
How many bad teams with one of the top 3 picks, with no QBoTF on the roster, dont pick a QB?


Unless Pioli wants to bring in a free agent starter, all signs point to the Chiefs selecting a QB.

Especially since 2 top tier guys have declared. You dont pass on talent like that.

evolve27 01-14-2009 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5391444)
In Stafford's case, I think it is just a question of maturity.

He's got a strong arm, and like many young QBs with a strong, feels that he can make plays that aren't there.

Some kids grow out of that, and Stafford seems to have a good head on his shoulders, so I think he will learn.
Excuse my ignorance or if you've mentioned it before, but who do you choose say both are available at 3?

Frosty 01-14-2009 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5391306)
Are you mildly reeruned?

Sanchez never missed a game....to remotely compare him to Croyle is dumb as ****.

What the hell is with the forum lately?
Petro was going on and on yesterday about how Sanchez was a walking injury and couldn't be counted on to play 16 games. :spock: I think people are just picking up on that dumbassery, since they don't have a clue.

luv 01-14-2009 07:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5391451)
He's improved from year to year, but he was still making questionable decisions.
He was concerned with the fact that he tends to like to throw into double coverage. Can't do that against an NFL defense.

ChiefsCountry 01-14-2009 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5391465)
He was concerned with the fact that he tends to like to throw into double coverage. Can't do that against an NFL defense.
Elway and Favre would like to disagree with that.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-14-2009 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5391174)
Based on just the Bowl games they played in, I was much more impressed with Sanchez.
And let me say this one more time:

That Rose Bowl performance was NOT some great "parting of the clouds by the hand of God to let the light shine down on Mark Sanchez on this one glorious game", it was another day in the life, and business...as...usual.

And if you want to make Aikman comparisons, that's fine as long as people understand that it's an "Aikman minus the brain dead/autistic slap-fight"-factor, with Peyton Manning's footwork thrown in to boot.

I'm happy with either guy, and I'm very happy that we can draft and develop a franchise QB now that the pretenders have gone back to class.

milkman 01-14-2009 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by evolve27 (Post 5391463)
Excuse my ignorance or if you've mentioned it before, but who do you choose say both are available at 3?
Right now, I'm leaning in Sanchez's direction, but a mild breeze could sway me in the other direction.

That's how close I see them.

Pasta Little Brioni 01-14-2009 07:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigChiefDave (Post 5391434)
Unless Bulger agrees to a pay cut, they are not drafting a QB 2nd overall.
Was reading a Ram board the other day and they were pretty sure they could get Sanchez in round 2 or 3 ROFL

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-14-2009 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by arc (Post 5391464)
Petro was going on and on yesterday about how Sanchez was a walking injury and couldn't be counted on to play 16 games. :spock: I think people are just picking up on that dumbassery, since they don't have a clue.
Soren Petro is a crap-flinging chimpanzee with a spine akin to jelly. He licked Carl's loafers like an Indonesian prostitute until Clark shit-canned his ass.

OnTheWarpath15 01-14-2009 07:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 5391475)
Was reading a Ram board the other day and they were pretty sure they could get Sanchez in round 2 or 3 ROFL
You can read the same dipshittery about Sanchez here.

luv 01-14-2009 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5391469)
Elway and Favre would like to disagree with that.
And how many times were they picked off? What kind of receivers did they have compared to us?

milkman 01-14-2009 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by luv (Post 5391465)
He was concerned with the fact that he tends to like to throw into double coverage. Can't do that against an NFL defense.
He's right, and that's one of the things he'll learn quickly in the NFL.

milkman 01-14-2009 07:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5391469)
Elway and Favre would like to disagree with that.
Elway learned that he couldn't get away with it all the time, and his decisions weren't nearly as stupid as Favre's.

Favre was just a dumbshit.

Boris The Great 01-14-2009 07:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PGM (Post 5391475)
Was reading a Ram board the other day and they were pretty sure they could get Sanchez in round 2 or 3 ROFL
To be fair, there are probably boards pointing here and laughing because people think Sanchez became a top 3 pick the minute he declared.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:58 PM.
Page 9 of 22 « First 5678 9 1011121319 Last »
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.