ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Blob Gretz = IT'S A TOUGH, LONG FIGHT (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=191823)

Redrum_69 09-17-2008 02:33 PM

when he first started talking about the battle of the bulge..i thought he was referring to Rhonda the Hutt

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by orange (Post 5029108)

I'm really not sure how that helps your case that Edwards is a good coach. By your own account, Edwards took a team with playoff type talent and coached them to a 4-12 record. I'm a little confused.

The 2007 Chiefs did not have playoff talent. Don't know where you came up with that.



Quote:

But this is year three and it's apparent early on that the D - Herm Edwards' D - has taken a step backward.
I wouldn't say that. Not at all. We essentially shut the Raiders out for a half on Sunday. Six points were on Colquitt (shanked punt) and Darling (tipped ball INT). Then they wore down because the offense hung them out to dry.

bobbything 09-17-2008 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5029116)
I wouldn't say that. Not at all. We essentially shut the Raiders out for a half on Sunday. Six points were on Colquitt (shanked punt) and Darling (tipped ball INT). Then they wore down because the offense hung them out to dry.

Our defense gave up 300 yards rushing, at home, to a bad offensive football team. That's bad defense any way you slice it.

GoChiefs_penis 09-17-2008 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5029116)
The 2007 Chiefs did not have playoff talent. Don't know where you came up with that.

I wouldn't say that. Not at all. We essentially shut the Raiders out for a half on Sunday. Six points were on Colquitt (shanked punt) and Darling (tipped ball INT). Then they wore down because the offense hung them out to dry.

God almighty man, get off your fat ass, quit spinning for the Chiefs and do something with your life. Since I'm obviously not going to get laid anytime this decade, can we at least get some mother****ing sunlight? You're a pathetic sack of shit!

And while you're at it, clean up the empty Dunkin Donut boxes. We got flies as big as B-52s flying around here because of that shit.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5029146)
Our defense gave up 300 yards rushing, at home, to a bad offensive football team. That's bad defense any way you slice it.

Yeah, they only gave up 300 yards to the 6th ranked rushing team from last year, who added Darren McFadden.

I can see why you think they are a bad offensive team...

:rolleyes:

luv 09-17-2008 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5029146)
Our defense gave up 300 yards rushing, at home, to a bad offensive football team. That's bad defense any way you slice it.

Defense also isn't used to being on the field for the majority of the game.

orange 09-17-2008 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5029116)
The 2007 Chiefs did not have playoff talent. Don't know where you came up with that.


I'm talking about the JETS - at least I think I am. That is who YOU were talking about WHEN I QUOTED YOU isn't it?


Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5028426)
And then Mangini PROMPTLY made the playoffs with Herm's talent.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quote:

Originally Posted by Claythan (Post 5029116)
I wouldn't say that. Not at all. We essentially shut the Raiders out for a half on Sunday. Six points were on Colquitt (shanked punt) and Darling (tipped ball INT). Then they wore down because the offense hung them out to dry.

In addition to getting reamed on the ground by the Raiders, the Chiefs gave up game-controlling rushing yardage to a very pedestrian New England offense operating with only about 10% of their playbook - this after an off-season devoted mainly to shoring up the run defense.

On top of that - and even more important in the long run - the Chiefs have NO semblance of a pass rush. Despite spending two of Edward's first three 1st-round picks on the DL and three of his four biggest free-agent signings on linebackers.

bobbything 09-17-2008 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5029161)
Yeah, they only gave up 300 yards to the 6th ranked rushing team from last year, who added Darren McFadden.

I can see why you think they are a bad offensive team...

:rolleyes:

Nonsense. Even if they're the #1 rushing team in the NFL, 300 yards is too much. It was bad rushing defense. We even had problems stopping New England's rushing attack as well. This team will not be good against the run...again.

When our front four was being parted, our linebackers were jumping out of their lanes ALL DAY. Either poor coaching, or poor talent. Either way, it's on the coaches.

They may be a good running team, but they're a bad all around offensive team.

Fairplay 09-17-2008 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv (Post 5029166)
Defense also isn't used to being on the field for the majority of the game.


Reading that sentence has me confused.

luv 09-17-2008 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fairplay (Post 5029208)
Reading that sentence has me confused.

Well, they should be getting used to it.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5029198)
Nonsense. Even if they're the #1 rushing team in the NFL, 300 yards is too much. It was bad rushing defense. We even had problems stopping New England's rushing attack as well. This team will not be good against the run...again.

When our front four was being parted, our linebackers were jumping out of their lanes ALL DAY. Either poor coaching, or poor talent. Either way, it's on the coaches.

They may be a good running team, but they're a bad all around offensive team.

Had you said that, it would have been fine.

300 yards IS way too much.

You said they were a "bad offensive team."

I called bullshit.

Fairplay 09-17-2008 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoChiefs_penis (Post 5029148)
God almighty man, get off your fat ass, quit spinning for the Chiefs and do something with your life. Since I'm obviously not going to get laid anytime this decade, can we at least get some mother****ing sunlight? You're a pathetic sack of shit!


lol.ROFL
I can't imagine having a life where you are sitting at home 24/7 practically.

And just typing on an internet forum most of the time.

That's really sad.

bobbything 09-17-2008 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 5029212)
You said they were a "bad offensive team."

I called bullshit.

They are a bad offensive football team. Since you want to go off of last year's stats, they were ranked in the mid 20's in total offense.

They won't be any better this year. Probably worse.

OnTheWarpath15 09-17-2008 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything (Post 5029223)
They are a bad offensive football team. Since you want to go off of last year's stats, they were ranked in the mid 20's in total offense.

They won't be any better this year. Probably worse.

No, they are a bad PASSING team.

Had they THROWN for 500 yards, I would have been surprised.

I wasn't surprised at all that they ran all over us, and said so repeatedly leading up to the game.

Hammock Parties 09-17-2008 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fairplay (Post 5029213)
lol.ROFL
I can't imagine having a life where you are sitting at home 24/7 practically.

And just typing on an internet forum most of the time.

That's really sad.

Certainly doesn't describe me. Must be some other penis.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.