![]() |
The price keeps going up.
Cooper Kupp arguably had the greatest season for a wide receiver in NFL history -- and is now cashing in on his accolades. Kupp and the Rams have agreed to terms on a three-year, $80 million extension, as first reported by ESPN and confirmed by CBS Sports NFL Insider Jonathan Jones. Kupp is set to make $110 million over the next five seasons, netting the latest massive contract given to a wideout after the market was reset in March. The extension includes $75 million guaranteed, according to ESPN. The $75 million guarantee represents the highest ever given to an NFL wide receiver or non-QB offensive player, according to ESPN. The total value of the deal gives Kupp an average of $22 million a year, making him the sixth-highest-paid wide receiver in the league. Tyreek Hill is the highest-paid wide receiver in the NFL, making $30 million annually. Davante Adams is second at $28 million followed by DeAndre Hopkins ($27,250,000), A.J. Brown ($25 million), and Stefon Diggs ($24 million). Kupp is just behind Hopkins with the three-year extension. Four of those five contracts were signed this offseason. On Monday, the Rams made All-Pro DT Aaron Donald the NFL's first $30M-per-year non-quarterback with a three-year, $95M deal. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Kupps deal is actually bigger than Hills. His real money is 26 per year. Hills is 23.
|
How much are the Rams going to suck in 3 years? Or does the salary cap not apply to LA?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m not questioning it. Everybody bitches about it when we do it. HOW DOES BRETT VEACH DO IT?!?!!! HE’S CHEATING!!! |
Quote:
|
****. Raiders re-signed Renfrow for 2 yrs 32 million.
|
Quote:
Adams and Carr literally said their contracts were worked out in a way so that Renfrow would get paid. Absolutely no surprise here. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Better than Denver does not equal good :D
3rd place Faid |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The offense has a lot of receiving talent, but the OL still has big question marks as well. They'll be better than Denver, though. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Have you forgotten what an absolute and abject disaster McDaniels was in his last run as head coach? He showed zero redeeming qualities. His plans sucked, his overall program sucked, his player handling sucked. I don't think running back to the Belichick umbrella for another decade fixed all those issues (it didn't the first time around). They'll finish 3rd behind KC and the Chargers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Derrick Carr. I repeat, Derrick Carr. |
1. KC
2. LA 3. DEN 4. Las Vegas Trainwreck |
Quote:
|
Didnt we beat the shit out of the raiders two times?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Chandler Jones had a whopping 0.5 sacks more than Ngakoue last year, and five of them came in one game against an extremely weak player who was summarily moved off the spot. That's a name upgrade. In terms of actual on-field upgrade, it looks negligable to me. |
People are hyping up replacing Tyreek hill with MVS and Juju meanwhile the Raiders getting a guy who had triple yards than both of them combined last year is just negligible. LMAO LMAO
|
Quote:
And it's totally fair to question the potency of Adams less Rodgers. No different than questioning the potency of Hill with Tua instead of Mahomes. QB play matters. |
Quote:
Meanwhile MVS also had Rodgers. And he had Adams on the other side and he caught less than 50% of the balls that went his way. Even though they were in those same "perfect windows". I don't get why you would downplay adding a player like that to a team that won 2 less game than us last year. If we're going to have a down year, and they improve even a little bit, why wouldn't they come out with the same record as us at worst? |
Quote:
And yeah Carr is a downgrade from Rodgers. But hes still a really good QB. He shouldn't be compared with Tua at all. |
Quote:
He's basically DeMarcus Robinson's replacement. If we got 500 yards out of him we'd be stoked, lol. The Raiders simply don't have a great roster. They have the worst roster in the division if we're being honest. A WR like Adams, who largely depends on precision ball placement, just isn't going to move the needle in overall wins and losses. |
Quote:
And the people you're referencing: They're merely saying the offense will look different, and get it done differently. Which is true. No one is hyping these guys up as if they're improvements over Hill. They're simply stating that production will come from various places rather than focused on one guy. |
Quote:
And the Raiders roster is better than ours. Even still, that "worst" roster won 10 games last year. So either they do a great job of maximizing the value of their players or, they just have a good roster. So let's say Devante drops off because of QB play and has a 1000 yard season and 7 touchdowns. You're telling me that that added to what Renfrow does added to what Waller does won't make a difference? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
King dipshit is clearly going for the offseason’s biggest moron.
There’s no other explanation at this point. |
Oh look my biggest fan is here with another post about me. Everybody say hello.
|
Quote:
And like I said, they lost two games more than us last year. One team improved in the off-season. The other team is looking at a reset year. So how exactly aren't they better? Do you think we maintained that 2 game buffer this off season? |
You’re talking about a team that we literally blew the **** out twice last season.
The only position groups where the Raiders are better is WR and EDGE. Everything else is a wash at best. |
Quote:
Even youve said this will be a down year and reset year for us. So why are you mad when someone says we probably won't maintain the 2 game buffer we had over them. |
Quote:
I don’t give a **** what our records were. We were clearly a much better team than them last year. We have a first place schedule every year with a target on our backs. You can’t just ignore 2 H2H games that resulted in blowouts. That’s just reeruned. |
89-23
That’s the combined score of the Chiefs vs. Raiders last year. |
Quote:
QB LG C RG RT TE WR2 (Demarcus ****ing Robinson) WR4 (Skyy Moore is KC's #4) DT NT CB (Sneed vs Mullen) S (Reid vs. Moehrig) S (Thornhill vs. Abram) NB (Fenton vs. Hobbs) K P Push: (3) LT LB LB Vegas better at: (6) WR1 SLOT WR RDE (Jones vs. Clark) LDE (Crosby vs. Karlaftis) CB (Ya-Sin vs. McDuffie) RB (Jacobs, I guess, is better than the Chiefs committee) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The draft slightly increasing my expectations? You aren’t allowed to slightly adjust expectations after the biggest part of the offseason is complete? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
If king and Tex had a baby it would be born with its head up its ass, arguing that it wasn’t.
|
Quote:
|
It's pretty funny that two of the worst posters are on here pumping up the goddam Raiders of all teams because they got Davante Adams which is like getting the most expensive rims possible for your Toyota Corolla
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Adding a guy who had 2800 yards and 29 touchdowns to a 10-7 team is barely an improvement.
You heard it here first. Meanwhile we added WRs that combined for 2080 yards and 18 touchdowns the past two years and we might not only be as good but maybe even better! |
Quote:
Unless Davante Adams came with a new pair of testicles for Carr, he's still going to fold under pressure. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
This draft is full of guys that are ready to contribute. They drafted at least 5 guys that should be able to play significant roles. Trent McDuffie for example was one of the safest prospects/picks in the draft. It’s entirely realistic that we could see zero drop-off from Ward. I’d argue McDuffie might even be an upgrade. He’s that ****ing good/ready. Of course that changes expectations. He was a top 15 player on my board. I was not expecting an addition like that. Not to mention Karlaftis, which was my best case scenario first pick for the Chiefs. Why would these additions not slightly change expectations? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The Raiders won their last 4 games all by 3 points or less. 6 all together.
10-7 last season means ****ing dick. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Last year means nothing. The entire division got tougher. They now have the worst QB in the division. Their schedule will be tougher. They got a new coaching staff. You keep pretending that it’s as simple as “derp they were 10-7 last year so they’ll clearly be better this year with Adams”. It doesn’t ****ing work like that. |
Quote:
Do you think Tua and Carr are on the same level of QB play? |
Quote:
|
Derek Carr has thrown over 30 touchdowns once.
It was seven years ago. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
They don’t have the best QB in the NFL, and arguably the best HC. That kind of sustained/consistent year to year success is not easy when you don’t have those things. They had one decent 10-7 season that could’ve easily been 7-10, and you seem to think it guarantees them success going forward. It doesn’t. You’re a ****ing moron. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
He’s a reerun. |
Quote:
But maybe my expectations are too low. Maybe i should expect the rookies to come in and play like vets right away and to be difference makers right from the start. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m not any more obsessed with you than Red Dawg, Tex, JakeF, or any of CP’s dumbest. I guess you can say that I’m obsessed with arguing with morons though. I can’t help myself. |
Quote:
They did? Beyond Adams, where is this major upgrade that’s going to make up for them being coached by a Belichick midget who already failed at epic levels the first time he left the mothership? Or that’s going to fix their shitty secondary? Ngakue to Chandler Jones? Is that it? |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.