ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Is it time to start Foles over Smith? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=302115)

ARROW2 11-01-2016 02:42 PM

I am not even talking about stats, just make a play when it is there in front of your ****ing face instead of being a bitch.

OnTheWarpath15 11-01-2016 02:43 PM

Option 1: Hit a wide open Hill standing 17 yards directly in front of him.

Option 2: Throw the ball away.

Option 3. Run, slide ridiculously late, get egg scrambled.


And this guy is supposedly one of the smartest QB's in the league?

ARROW2 11-01-2016 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12522011)
Option 1: Hit a wide open Hill standing 17 yards directly in front of him.

Option 2: Throw the ball away.

Option 3. Run, slide ridiculously late, get egg scrambled.


And this guy is supposedly one of the smartest QB's in the league?




ROFL. This is why we don't get respect.

oaklandhater 11-01-2016 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 12522008)
I am not even talking about stats, just make a play when it is there in front of your ****ing face instead of being a bitch.

Being a bitch is in his nature all he does is play passive Bullcrap the entire season I can't stand it anymore.

ARROW2 11-01-2016 02:46 PM

People respect our defense and probably our weapons but not our QB. You can say all of the nice things you want about Smiff but he leaves a lot of points on the field EVERY SINGLE WEEK. I'm fed up. Foles comes in without a leash and lights it up. Colts had no answer for anything we wanted to do after that. That is what you are SUPPOSED to do to the colts.

Discuss Thrower 11-01-2016 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 12522011)
Option 1: Hit a wide open Hill standing 17 yards directly in front of him.

Option 2: Throw the ball away.

Option 3. Run, slide ridiculously late, get egg scrambled.


And this guy is supposedly one of the smartest QB's in the league?

And options 2 and 3 (sans injury aspect) are 100% defensible because to choose option 1 is just "fantasy team jerk off material".

Because **** having a QB capable of capitalizing on big plays, let's just rely on a running game and turnovers to keep the score close.

ARROW2 11-01-2016 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12522036)
And options 2 and 3 (sans injury aspect) are 100% defensible because to choose option 1 is just "fantasy team jerk off material".

Because **** having a QB capable of capitalizing on big plays, let's just rely on a running game and turnovers to keep the score close.

Hence no rings in 46 years

Sandy Vagina 11-01-2016 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 12522017)
People respect our defense and probably our weapons but not our QB. You can say all of the nice things you want about Smiff but he leaves a lot of points on the field EVERY SINGLE WEEK. I'm fed up. Foles comes in without a leash and lights it up. Colts had no answer for anything we wanted to do after that. That is what you are SUPPOSED to do to the colts.


ahaaaaaaaa!!!!

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view/144204/aha-aha-o.gif

Discuss Thrower 11-01-2016 03:15 PM

I just love how it's a "Durrrr fantasy football ruining the game" narrative around here.

No. It matters *very* little if your starting QB puts up 210 1/0 TDs to INTs or 3/2 ratio and 305 if you ultimately win. What *does* matter when those yards are earned and points put on the board. Nobody rational would be bitching Smith got 55 of those yards and the TD on the final offensive possession of the game to either take the lead or to salt away a game.

Problem is that outside of maybe five total games in a decade long career Smith has proven incapable of doing just that. Prior to the head injury Smith was looking like he had the potential to actually come up big when the moment calls for it, which is what most rational fans who have been Smith skeptics are really asking for. Issue being they've been against awful defenses.

Foles very well might be totally incapable of putting points on the board when it matters and inept against an average or better defense. But he doesn't have the track record to exactly prove that point. Smith, on the other hand, has a track record of being foiled in critical situations or against average to good defenses.

Q'ing myself here but we know Smith's ceiling and his floor. We don't know Foles' ceiling but have a pretty good idea that Foles' floor is much lower than Smith's.

Sandy Vagina 11-01-2016 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower (Post 12522074)
Q'ing myself here but we know Smith's ceiling and his floor. We don't know Foles' ceiling but have a pretty good idea that Foles' floor is much lower than Smith's.

Well keep on a shoutin' it, bruh. Another 100x a day, and maybe Andy will get the message. You have that power! Carry on!

ARROW2 11-01-2016 03:22 PM

Yes, it is time to start Foles over Smiff. He doesn't even run any more.

Sandy Vagina 11-01-2016 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2 (Post 12522085)
Yes, it is time to start Foles over Smiff. He doesn't even run any more.

so how do you feel about Smith starting over Foles?

we are all dying to know...

oaklandhater 11-01-2016 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12522088)
so how do you feel about Smith starting over Foles?

we are all dying to know...

It will be the best day ever when we have a offensive meltdown sandy and you and the other Alex ballwasher will still be tossing your same old bull crap excuses with foles on the roster

Sandy Vagina 11-01-2016 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater (Post 12522093)
It will be the best day ever when we have a offensive meltdown sandy and you and the other Alex ballwasher will still be tossing your same old bull crap excuses with foles on the roster

There really is no way that this ends poorly for me.

I like Foles, as well as Smith. If Foles really is better, then bring it on.

I respect Smith enough that I'd want him to retire before he gets killed. Dude has too many gigabytes to risk, and will do so much more in life after football.

If Foles comes in and fails horribly, I can at least laugh at some of you.

If Foles comes in and is great, you can laugh at me, but I'll be smiling over winning.. so go on ahead.

If Foles doesn't come in at all, then I will go back to watching Smith win... and then likely wave g'bye to Foles, as they decline to pick up his expensive QB2 option for next yr.


I'm good. :)

ARROW2 11-01-2016 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12522088)
so how do you feel about Smith starting over Foles?

we are all dying to know...

You don't know? Have you not read my posts?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.