![]() |
Quote:
|
Doesn't St. Louis already have the Big Ten network? If they do, then adding Missouri doesn't really add you much in terms of tv sets. If I'm the Big Ten I'd go east because you're really only adding the Kansas City market if you already have your network on tv's in St. Louis.
|
Quote:
|
Regarding the profit margins for schools basketball vs football
http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/15/comm...sbiz/index.htm "Together those schools had a combined $330.8 million in revenue during the 2004-05 school year, and $148.3 million in profits, even when including results from the 14 money-losing basketball programs involved in March Madness. Based on those numbers, basketball is more of a sure money maker for schools than college football -- at least for the schools in the so-called six major conferences. In fact, about half of the schools in this year's Big Dance come from the ACC, Big East, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac Ten and SEC. And these major conference schools account for 84 percent of the total revenue and about 97 percent of the total profit of all the schools in the tournament." |
Quote:
It's on some setups already but if MU joins they think they can most likely force all the cable companies to buy the BTN for their customers. |
Quote:
Aren't there already 3 BCS winners in there? Why wouldn't they raise it up? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
We have "win something, ANYTHING" and you have "history awaits"... |
Quote:
ROFL |
Quote:
The Big XII North, which you might NEVER win. Ever. Eternity. Now go tell Texas who your daddy is. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
IIRC Both schools are members of the AAU. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.