ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Bambi 06-06-2010 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6802657)
Besides stuff that's out of the control of each university, like TV markets, why would any conference want Mizzou over Kansas?

endgame

*crickets*

vailpass 06-06-2010 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802651)
They bring population.

Why is this so hard for you guys to understand?

I'm confused.

Kansas is a smaller state and splits itself with another major university. No one ever said otherwise.

How you can't understand this is beyond me.

You honestly think Missouri has a more accomplished athletic program than Kansas? Do you really think that? Because if you do then I can't help you, sorry.

Additional Big10 Network subscribers are very important when considering additions to the conference.
Also important are a widely rounded out athletic program, academic and research standing, facilities, infrastructure and brand appeal.

Hot chicks and a mimimum of whiny-assed fans also factor in.


Research indicates that MU satisfies these requirements mor than KU would.

Bambi 06-06-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6802657)
Besides stuff that's out of the control of each university, like TV markets, why would any conference want Mizzou over Kansas?

Or maybe the Big 10 thinks that Ian Kinsler, Anthony Peeler and Kellon Winslow are a better collection of historic players than Wilt Chamberlain, Gale Sayers, and Jim Ryun.

But I kind of doubt that.

KChiefs1 06-06-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802430)
I've actually stated in another thread that I'd be fine with KU joining the MWC.

Boise St, TCU, Utah, BYU are all good to great football programs. You'd think that if Boise and KU/KSU join they will surely be elevated to BCS status...

It will just be weird to not play Neb, MU, and OK year in and year out. And for what? Money that none of the fans will ever see? I don't get it.

I still find it hard to believe that Tex would join the Pac-10 btw.

Where's my $25,000??????? :D

Brock 06-06-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6802672)
Additional Big10 Network subscribers are very important when considering additions to the conference.

meaningless nonsense snipped.

Edited for truthfulness.

vailpass 06-06-2010 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6802657)
Besides stuff that's out of the control of each university, like TV markets, why would any conference want Mizzou over Kansas?

You can't separate market share from the equation; market share is one of the key factors. I'm sorry that KU fans are facing conference limbo, I can see this isn't sittint well with some KY people.
I don't mean to offen you, I'm looking at this from a Big10 point of view. It feels very strange to be letting any other schools in and I'm very interested in maintaining the look and feel of the conference.
Hell I still look at Penn State as the new kid on the block and deep down don't truly see them as Big 10.

Bambi 06-06-2010 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6802672)
Additional Big10 Network subscribers are very important when considering additions to the conference.
Also important are a widely rounded out athletic program, academic and research standing, facilities, infrastructure and brand appeal.

Hot chicks and a mimimum of whiny-assed fans also factor in.


Research indicates that MU satisfies these requirements mor than KU would.

Well in this years US and World Report ranked the schools like this:

96. University of Kansas
96. University of Nebraska

102. University of Missouri

So you're wrong. Try again.

It's number of cable subscribers. That's all. Where did you go to school? You should try and get your money back.

vailpass 06-06-2010 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6802678)
Edited for truthfulness.

:D KU butthurt coming out huge. The coming shake is going to change things but I think it will end up better for most. KU doesn't need the Big10 or any power conference for that matter. They will get their invite in March every year and then conference doesn't matter.

Bambi 06-06-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6802674)
Where's my $25,000??????? :D

STFU :)

Brock 06-06-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6802691)
:D KU butthurt coming out huge. The coming shake is going to change things but I think it will end up better for most. KU doesn't need the Big10 or any power conference for that matter. They will get their invite in March every year and then conference doesn't matter.

When you're trying to put together a credible football program, conference matters.

vailpass 06-06-2010 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6802687)
Well in this years US and World Report ranked the schools like this:

96. University of Kansas
96. University of Nebraska

102. University of Missouri

So you're wrong. Try again.

It's number of cable subscribers. That's all. Where did you go to school? You should try and get your money back.

:D I'm an Iowa Hawkeye, you know, from that conference that doesn't want you.

This whole left-home-on-friday-night thing is getting to some of you. Why do you take it so personal? It's just business.

vailpass 06-06-2010 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6802698)
When you're trying to put together a credible football program, conference matters.

Absolutely. Without a power conference a football program is pretty much dead before it starts. Thus the coming conference expansions.

ChiefsCountry 06-06-2010 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6802699)
:D I'm an Iowa Hawkeye, you know, from that conference that doesn't want you.

This whole left-home-on-friday-night thing is getting to some of you. Why do you take it so personal? It's just business.

Dude you are arguing with a dumbass who thinks a) college basketball makes more money than college football and b) said the MWC would be better for KU than the Big Ten.

Bambi 06-06-2010 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6802699)
:D I'm an Iowa Hawkeye, you know, from that conference that doesn't want you.

This whole left-home-on-friday-night thing is getting to some of you. Why do you take it so personal? It's just business.

So call Iowa and ask them to refund you.

How many times do I have to repeat this? I don't want KU to go to the Big 10. Nor do I ever expect them to be asked.

Stop inventing complaints to make your argument make sense.

You sound reeruned when you do that.

just sayin

Bambi 06-06-2010 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 6802709)
Dude you are arguing with a dumbass who thinks a) college basketball makes more money than college football and b) said the MWC would be better for KU than the Big Ten.

For athletic success and provided the MWC is elevated to BCS status then yes, KU will find more success in the MWC.

What would you want them to be Iowa? Never coming close to winning anything that doesn't involve two boys grouping each other while wearing tights?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.