ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

Sam Hall 06-16-2010 07:44 AM

This could get ugly for Texas. The Longhorns would've really damaged the conference by going to be Pac-10. NU and CU protected themselves by leaving.

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 07:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6824634)
This could get ugly for Texas. The Longhorns would've really damaged the conference by going to be Pac-10. NU and CU protected themselves by leaving.

You poor victim.

WilliamTheIrish 06-16-2010 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6824620)
This is about damages, and NU and CU didn't damage the conference by leaving.

I agree with both points.

1) Losing UNL/CU didn't damamge the conference in sports. Especially CBB


2) Pay up.

WilliamTheIrish 06-16-2010 07:48 AM

Sam, only two years after being a ticket taker at a Lee's Summit theater is now waxing rhapsodic about conference law. Gotta love huskerpediophiles.

alnorth 06-16-2010 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6824625)
The conference bylaws refer to damages, not contracts.

Unfortunately for you, the contract does not say "you will be responsible for any damages you cause by leaving up to x%" it basically says "by joining the conference, you agree in advance that leaving under these circumstances will result in financial damages, and therefore such and such will happen"

Damages do not necessarily have to be proven because Nebraska already agreed back in 1996 that if they ever left it would result in damages.

Quote:

3.2 Effect of Giving Notice. If a Member Institution gives proper Notice pursuant to Section 3.1 (a “Withdrawing Member”), then the Members agree that such withdrawal would cause financial hardship to the remaining Member Institutions of the Conference, and that the financial consequences cannot be measured or estimated with certainty at this time. Therefore, in recognition of the obligations and responsibilities of each Member Institution to all other Member Institutions of the Conference, each Member Institution agrees that the amount of revenue that would have been otherwise distributable to a Withdrawing Member 14 pursuant to Section 2 herein for the final two (2) years of the Current Term or the thencurrent Additional Term, as the case may be, shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%), with the remainder to be distributed to the other Member Institutions who are not Withdrawing Members or Breaching Members (as defined below) as additional Conference revenues in accordance with Section 2 herein. The Member Institutions agree that such reduction in the amount of revenues distributed to a Withdrawing Member is reasonable and shall be in the form of liquidated damages and not be construed as a penalty.

3.3 Effect of Withdrawal From Conference Other Than by Giving Proper Notice. If, other than by giving a proper Notice pursuant to Section 3.1, a Member Institution (a “Breaching Member”) withdraws, resigns, or otherwise ceases to participate as a full Member Institution in full compliance with these Rules, or gives notice or otherwise states its intent to so withdraw, resign, or cease to participate in the future (a “Breach”), then the Member Institutions agree that such Breach would cause financial hardship to the remaining Member Institutions of the Conference, and that the financial consequences cannot be measured or estimated with certainty at this time. Therefore, in recognition of the obligations and responsibilities of each Member Institution to all other Member Institutions of the Conference, each Member Institution agrees that after such Breach, the amount of Conference revenue that would otherwise have been distributed or distributable to the Breaching Member during the two (2) years prior to the end of the Current Term or the then-current Additional Term, as the case may be, shall be reduced by an amount that equals the sum of the aggregate of such revenues times the following percentages (such sum being the “Aggregate Reduction”); if Notice is received less than two years but on or before eighteen months prior to the Effective Date, 70%; if Notice is received less than eighteen months but on or before twelve months prior to the Effective Date, 80%; if Notice is received less than twelve months but on or before six months prior to the Effective Date, 90%; or if Notice is received less than six months prior to the Effective Date, 100%.
3.3 goes on and on from there, but the remaining legalese isn't important. I suppose Nebraska could try to make an equity argument that this would be "unjust enrichment". I'm not a lawyer, but good luck with that.

Saulbadguy 06-16-2010 08:01 AM

CU to the Pac-10 is still absolutely hilarious.

patteeu 06-16-2010 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6824605)
There are newspaper articles in Lincoln and Omaha saying NU could go to court over the exit penalty.

On what basis?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6824613)
NU and CU shouldn't have to pay anything. Dan Beebe came up with a bunch of money this past weekend after both of them left. The Big 12 obviously doesn't need more money. Several Big 12 people have even said NU and CU didn't hurt the conference by leaving.

What does any of that have to do with anything?

Reerun_KC 06-16-2010 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6824663)
On what basis?



What does any of that have to do with anything?

OU's Ad on the radio yesterday was talking about the penalty they had both had to pay for leaving the conference...

Sounds like bitter jilted fan to me... NU left by their own will, nobody forced them to leave... So its time to pay up.

Frazod 06-16-2010 08:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6824502)
Each game Nebraska is winning the clock will freeze at :01 until the other team wins.

Works for me!

patteeu 06-16-2010 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6824625)
The conference bylaws refer to damages, not contracts.

They are stipulated damages. Nebraska and Colorado already agreed by signing the contract that leaving would cause damage (whether it actually ends up doing so or not) and that that the compensation for that damage would be as indicated in the contract.

Edit: As Alnorth already said...

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 6824645)
Unfortunately for you, the contract does not say "you will be responsible for any damages you cause by leaving up to x%" it basically says "by joining the conference, you agree in advance that leaving under these circumstances will result in financial damages, and therefore such and such will happen"

Damages do not necessarily have to be proven because Nebraska already agreed back in 1996 that if they ever left it would result in damages.


kepp 06-16-2010 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6824556)
Why is that funny? "Compelling" is fair, no? A conference with OU, Texas, Notre Dame, A&M, and Arkansas would turn on a lot of television sets for a lot of different reasons.

Strongest? No. Compelling? Sure.

Compelling? Yes. "In the history of college football"? Probably not.

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6824725)
Compelling? Yes. "In the history of college football"? Probably not.

Precisely. I'm fine with the use of the word 'compelling' as long as the preceding 'most' and trailing 'in the history of college football' are removed.

kepp 06-16-2010 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6824677)
They are stipulated damages. Nebraska and Colorado already agreed by signing the contract that leaving would cause damage (whether it actually ends up doing so or not) and that that the compensation for that damage would be as indicated in the contract.

Also, the money doesn't really come in the form of payments so much as from revenue the Big12 withholds from CU/NU, right? So, the money WILL be withheld, and they'd have to go to court to get it back.

alnorth 06-16-2010 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6824731)
Also, the money doesn't really come in the form of payments so much as from revenue the Big12 withholds from CU/NU, right? So, the money WILL be withheld, and they'd have to go to court to get it back.

Yep. The only chance I think they would have (again, not a lawyer) is to make an equity argument that this clause is so grossly unfair that it would lead to unjust enrichment.

As I understand it, "equity" is an unpredictable squirrelly area of the law that tries to address something that is blatantly unfair no matter what the contract may say. For example, if your cell phone contract had a termination penalty of 10 million dollars buried in the fine print, that would get thrown out because of equity. (the "damage" to the cell phone company is clearly nowhere close to 10 million dollars, and the fee is hilariously high)

However, this is the University of Nebraska we are talking about here. Not some little old lady suckered into a bad contract by an unethical salesman. They have access to some of the best legal advice in the country. Plus, the "damages" in the contract do not sound highly unreasonable to me that it would trigger an equity argument. Damages are uncertain, and forgoing a share of revenue for 1 or 2 years sounds like a reasonable remedy.

ceebz 06-16-2010 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 6824455)
Eastern Kansas is likely to root for Colorado,


No, more like eastern Coloradans are likely to root for Kansas.

Believe me, I'm one of them, and I grew up in the 80's watching Kansas basketball.

Reerun_KC 06-16-2010 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6824726)
Precisely. I'm fine with the use of the word 'compelling' as long as the preceding 'most' and trailing 'in the history of college football' are removed.

And we care how you feel about it?

Pants 06-16-2010 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by schneider221 (Post 6824598)
Chip Brown reported this which is where they got it from. He said this was one of the things that caused Texas to reconsider.

Chip Brown hasn't really been wrong about any of this, has he?

sedated 06-16-2010 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6824746)
And we care how you feel about it?

I don't see why he is even participating in this thread, other than his inability to resist constantly declaring the SEC the greatest football entity in the history of entities.

I think he has some sort of Florida/SEC tourettes.

Reerun_KC 06-16-2010 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 6824769)
I don't see why he is even participating in this thread, other than his inability to resist constantly declaring the SEC the greatest football entity in the history of entities.

I think he has some sort of Florida/SEC tourettes.

IDK? especially when 99% of the posters in here probably doesnt give a shit if the SEC existed or not...

I know I dont.

Bambi 06-16-2010 09:46 AM

Petro repeating exactly what I've been saying about the myth of football revenue.

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6824746)
And we care how you feel about it?

Obviously.

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sedated (Post 6824769)
I don't see why he is even participating in this thread, other than his inability to resist constantly declaring the SEC the greatest football entity in the history of entities.

I think he has some sort of Florida/SEC tourettes.

Do you lack mental capacity? There were rumors and scenarios about every BCS conference, including the SEC.

kepp 06-16-2010 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6824811)
Petro repeating exactly what I've been saying about the myth of football revenue.

You should probably consider that the killshot on that particular theory.

Reerun_KC 06-16-2010 09:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6824816)
Obviously.

Fail

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6824830)
Fail

Yes. You fail. Thanks for playing.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6824725)
Compelling? Yes. "In the history of college football"? Probably not.

Maybe...even probably not. I do think adding Notre Dame would make it the "most" compelling conference, since the author is essentially using the term as a synonym for "interesting."

And, historically, there's probably an argument there.

Pants 06-16-2010 09:57 AM

This thread gets less AWESOME every time DaKCManAP posts.

/sigh

Reerun_KC 06-16-2010 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6824839)
Yes. You fail. Thanks for playing.

Why because I could care less if the SEC fell off the map or not? Or that SEC means absolutely nothing to us as fans of the big 12?

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6824862)
Why because I could care less if the SEC fell off the map or not? Or that SEC means absolutely nothing to us as fans of the big 12?

You fail in that you do care how I feel about it, and my participation in this thread, otherwise you wouldn't even respond to my post. You also fail at the English language and at the fact that the SEC does mean something to fans of Oklahoma and Texas, without whom there would not be a Big XII.

By the way, you're the only one bringing up the SEC today.

WilliamTheIrish 06-16-2010 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6824811)
Petro repeating exactly what I've been saying about the myth of football revenue.

Of course. Never mind the numbers. It's a myth.

kepp 06-16-2010 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6824854)
Maybe...even probably not. I do think adding Notre Dame would make it the "most" compelling conference, since the author is essentially using the term as a synonym for "interesting."

And, historically, there's probably an argument there.

Oh, no doubt Notre Dame joining would make it the most compelling right now. That would be huge.

Sam Hall 06-16-2010 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6824636)
You poor victim.

i found your victim

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5LNIWaYNJZI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5LNIWaYNJZI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Reerun_KC 06-16-2010 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6824872)
You fail in that you do care how I feel about it, and my participation in this thread, otherwise you wouldn't even respond to my post. You also fail at the English language and at the fact that the SEC does mean something to fans of Oklahoma and Texas, without whom there would not be a Big XII.

By the way, you're the only one bringing up the SEC today.

Funny, OKC sports radio has been talking about OU and Texas for days now and the SEC isnt brought up.... Alot of the people I work with are OU fans, lots of clients OU fans... Sorry, but people here in Norman OK dont really care about the SEC, yes it was a small blip on the radar for a day or so, but 90% of the "fans" had zero interest in the SEC. Including my boss who is an OU grad. SEC doesnt mean shit to him either...

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 6824911)
Funny, OKC sports radio has been talking about OU and Texas for days now and the SEC isnt brought up.... Alot of the people I work with are OU fans, lots of clients OU fans... Sorry, but people here in Norman OK dont really care about the SEC, yes it was a small blip on the radar for a day or so, but 90% of the "fans" had zero interest in the SEC. Including my boss who is an OU grad. SEC doesnt mean shit to him either...

I'm not talking about expansion and current radio talk. A&M had more talk going on about the SEC than OU and UT with respect to expansion. I was talking in general terms. Like OU and UT might have a couple championships if it weren't for the SEC.

RustShack 06-16-2010 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6823634)
I hope Nebraska goes to court over this exist penalty. Texas was no better in any of this.

Yeah. Except for the whole, they didn't leave thing.

|Zach| 06-16-2010 10:36 AM

Sam Hall is having one of his silly moments.

kstater 06-16-2010 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 6824947)
Sam Hall is having one of his silly moments.

I don't really care about all this.

vailpass 06-16-2010 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6824568)
The "most compelling conference in the history of college football" is an overstatement, don't you think? If the Big XII added ND and Arkansas (which won't happen), it still wouldn't be the most overpowering, or attention grabbing college football conference currently, yet in the history of college football.

com·pel·ling

–adjective

1.tending to compel; overpowering: compelling reasons.

2.having a powerful and irresistible effect; requiring acute admiration, attention, or respect: a man of compelling integrity; a compelling drama.


Agreed. UT and OU are compelling football, the rest of those schlunkos don't mean a thing to me.
ND is old news. If the domers don't get to a BCS bowl in the next year or two they are going to fall even further off the table.
Arkansas? Are you kidding me? Those games can only be watched on a TV that works which is perched atop a TV that does not work.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:12 AM

Lew on 810 right now, impressively competing with Alden for most inept AD in the midwest.

Pants 06-16-2010 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6825030)
Agreed. UT and OU are compelling football, the rest of those schlunkos don't mean a thing to me.
ND is old news. If the domers don't get to a BCS bowl in the next year or two they are going to fall even further off the table.
Arkansas? Are you kidding me? Those games can only be watched on a TV that works which is perched atop a TV that does not work.

Iowa.

LOL.

Pants 06-16-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825035)
Lew on 810 right now, impressively competing with Alden for most inept AD in the midwest.

What's he saying, brah?

vailpass 06-16-2010 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6824811)
Petro repeating exactly what I've been saying about the myth of football revenue.

Flat earther are you?

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6825044)
What's he saying, brah?

Love everyone. Great job. Love the Big 12. Our chancellor is a rock star. Beebe, awesome.

Truly an embarrassing display, but nothing we haven't just seen from Mizzou.

vailpass 06-16-2010 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6825036)
Iowa.

LOL.

Keep barking little doggy; all that UT spunk in your stomach is making you feel like a big dog.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:21 AM

"We would be willing to help subsidize...three schools [UT, OU, A&M]...IF, if, those three schools don't meet 'the big whole number.' If you don't make it on your own, we'd be willing to share with you, out of our basket."

"We know who the driving schools are."

Texas doesn't think they will need help.

Lew: "At the end of the day there is a possibility we might have to give a bit, or we might not have to give them anything. But we guarantee you, if you're not able to get that number."

Pants 06-16-2010 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6825061)
Keep barking little doggy; all that UT spunk in your stomach is making you feel like a big dog.

I'm not barking, why would I bark? I'm just pointing out the absurdity of you saying anything about any other school being an Iowa fan.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:25 AM

"You stay with us, the worst that could happen is that you could make that number."

No definition of "that number."

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:26 AM

10-year commitment to conference, per Lew.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:28 AM

"Problems trying to get to another conference because we're chained to K-State."

(Ok, that one's bullshit.)

Pants 06-16-2010 11:29 AM

Our school did what they had to. Not much else that could've been done, I guess.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:29 AM

"I'm the half-cup guy."

??

GoHuge 06-16-2010 11:29 AM

Lew loves him some K-State. If he has to go to war he's rollin with John Currie!! :D

Man I've never heard so much slurping, reach arounds, and bromances among rivals! :)

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:31 AM

"Don't think about liquidating damages; it's a non-factor."

"It's not a factor at all."

GoHuge 06-16-2010 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825094)
"Don't think about liquidating damages; it's a non-factor."

"It's not a factor at all."

Deez just curious bro.........do you have a job or just independently wealthy as you're able to be the CP updater of updater's? Of course we all appreciate your efforts........just curious.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:37 AM

I have two alternatives when I have a birthday:

"One is to have a birthday; the other is not to have a birthday."

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoHuge39 (Post 6825102)
Deez just curious bro.........do you have a job or just independently wealthy as you're able to be the CP updater of updater's? Of course we all appreciate your efforts........just curious.

Of course I don't work, brah. I have parents.

And I'm in my 50s.

kepp 06-16-2010 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825115)
I have two alternatives when I have a birthday:

"One is to have a birthday; the other is not to have a birthday."

Wow...uh...you go, Lew!

vailpass 06-16-2010 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6825074)
I'm not barking, why would I bark? I'm just pointing out the absurdity of you saying anything about any other school being an Iowa fan.

ROFL Second tier gimp school talking smack. Cute. Did UT give you permission to post that?

Pants 06-16-2010 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6825121)
ROFL Second tier gimp school talking smack. Cute. Did UT give you permission to post that?

How many times are you going to use that line? Like I said earlier, I'm not talking smack, I'm just pointing out that you're a fan of one of the most obscure big schools in the country and, as such, probably shouldn't be talking smack at all.

vailpass 06-16-2010 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6825132)
How many times are you going to use that line? Like I said earlier, I'm not talking smack, I'm just pointing out that you're a fan of one of the most obscure big schools in the country and, as such, probably shouldn't be talking smack at all.

Whatever makes you feel better junior.

Pants 06-16-2010 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6825135)
Whatever makes you feel better junior.

You think this makes me feel better? Nah, like I said earlier, I'm just pointing out how reeruned you are in every possible way. Your retorts always consist of some stupid cliche that is completely irrelevant (kind of like billay) which further proves my point. You're just a fat troll who provides absolutely no value.

GoHuge 06-16-2010 11:50 AM

Lew has lost his ****ing mind! What the hell was that? Rambling........blah, blah, blah'dee, blah, blah, liquidation, no your not hearing me, blah, blah, we're not touching that money, LISTEN TO WHAT I'M SAYING!!!!! Good God I hope K-State doesn't have a presser. Everyone of these schools that have had an apocalypse averted press conference has been an unmitigated disaster. Stop talking!!!

Just issue a joint statement amongst the 5 schools that were almost left pissing in the wind. "Thank you Texas!! Nevermind all that shit we said about you being a bunch greedy cheating cocksmoking cousin ****ers. WE LOVE YOU!!!"

vailpass 06-16-2010 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6825145)
You think this makes me feel better? Nah, like I said earlier, I'm just pointing out how reeruned you are in every possible way. Your retorts always consist of some stupid cliche that is completely irrelevant (kind of like billay) which further proves my point. You're just a fat troll who provides absolutely no value.

Looks like somebody living in Hicktown, USA has his labia in a twist. Perhaps UT will give you permission apply some bag balm to Bevo as a way to calm you down.

Reaper16 06-16-2010 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6825118)
Of course I don't work, brah. I have parents.

And I'm in my 50s.

50's? I would have never guessed. You have the posting style of a witty, young, early-to-mid-20's, super-cool guy like me.

Titty Meat 06-16-2010 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu (Post 6824579)
You guys are still whining about that good call?

Has anyone noticed how Missouri maneuvered the two teams that most famously cheated them out of victories right on out of the Big 12? Goodbye and good riddance to the Colorado Fifth Down Buffalos and the Nebraska Kick-to-Catch Huskers.

Read what Willie said. Nevermind just go back to politics you goon.

Titty Meat 06-16-2010 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Metrolike (Post 6825145)
You think this makes me feel better? Nah, like I said earlier, I'm just pointing out how reeruned you are in every possible way. Your retorts always consist of some stupid cliche that is completely irrelevant (kind of like billay) which further proves my point. You're just a fat troll who provides absolutely no value.

Ohhh look it's Metro policing the internets. If everyone is reeruned as you claim your life must be tragic. You sit around all day pointing this shit out go get a job or is the interviewer turned off by the pink shirt?

teedubya 06-16-2010 12:10 PM

Cliff's Notes version: Lew Perkins press conference, 6/16/2010
Blog: The Newell Post
By Jesse Newell
June 16, 2010
Here is the Cliff's Notes version of Kansas athletic director Lew Perkins' comments at his press conference today.

Full audio will be posted later.

• Perkins says KU is unbelievably happy that all 10 schools were able to stay together in the Big 12. There's lots of value in that.

• In Perkins' opinion, it is one of the greatest things to happen in intercollegiate athletics in a long time. Ten is a great number for the Big 12. Some things are still unanswered, and the league is trying to work through those as quickly as possible. Basically, it's like starting a new conference with all the details that still need to be worked out. This will not be finished for a long time.

• One of the questions he gets asked most is about the conference name. Perkins doesn't know the answer, and he believes everyone in the league will have to talk about whether a name change is needed.

• Though he thinks many of the reporters will want to know about the numbers, Perkins doesn't have completely accurate numbers right now. Things could change over time. He doesn't think any Big 12 schools would have accurate numbers right now.

• No one in the Big 12 is interested in expansion right now. The schools like having 10 teams. Perkins believes that perhaps this could start a trend for schools to go smaller. KU coach Bill Self said it well yesterday when he talked about the new Big 12 being like the old Big Eight.

• KU worked hard behind the scenes to keep this thing together. There are always going to be disagreements. That's never going to go away. But Perkins came away thinking this was the best thing for the Big 12, for the 10 teams still involved and for intercollegiate athletics.

• Perkins believes the basketball league will be stronger.

• Perkins said he kept KU's coaches in the loop throughout the process as much as he could.

• Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe deserves to be thanked. He has been blamed for a lot of things, but he and his staff might have saved intercollegiate athletics as we see it today. Perkins doesn't think the change would have been best for the student athletes involved.

• KU chancellor Bernadette Gray-Little was a watchdog, and she and Perkins were in constant contact through the whole process.

• If Perkins ever had to "go to war," he'd want to do so with Kansas State's president Kirk Schulz and KSU athletic director John Currie. Everything between KU and KSU was done step in step.

• As the five "leftover" Big 12 schools looked at things — Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State, Baylor and Missouri — they came up with a business plan to try to keep the Big 12 together. Perkins compared it to a starting five of players and an institution trying to keep a good basketball coach. The schools knew what the other schools were being offered by other conferences.

• The five leftover schools then tried to figure out what they had to do to keep those other schools on board. Perkins said that the five leftover schools agreed to help subsidize the other three schools — Texas, Oklahoma and Texas A&M — if they didn't make a certain number of dollars. The "leftovers" were going to make more money with 10 teams in the Big 12 than if they were left on their own. At the end of the day, the leftover schools might have to pay a little bit, and they might not have to pay anything. Those leftover schools will guarantee, though, that those other schools would make at least what they would have made elsewhere.

• The five leftover schools hope they won't have to give additional funds to the other three schools. That's not guaranteed, though. Time will tell. The agreement just allows the leftover schools to guarantee that the Big 12 schools that were thinking about leaving, even with a worst-case scenario, will make at least as much money as they would have made in other conferences.

• The Big 12 schools signed an agreement to stay in the conference 10 years. If other things happen, it could be longer. Perkins says he has no reason to fear that any other Big 12 team will bolt on the league. All indications are that the teams are in the Big 12 for the long haul.

• Perkins says his only concern was the Big 12 during the process. His only concern now is the Big 12. He won't address the other hypotheticals and things that might have taken place in previous weeks. Everything else is meaningless now.

• Perkins says not to focus on liquidating damages. It's a non-factor in this whole situation.

• Perkins says it doesn't matter if this situation could have been averted. It doesn't matter now. There are a lot of coulda, woulda, shouldas. Things happen. Everybody wants to point a finger at somebody. Perkins says he's not going to worry about yesterday. He feels good that the 10 teams are in this for the long haul.

• Perkins' guess is that it's going to take a year to put everything in the Big 12 back together, because the conference is starting at zero.

• Scheduling is very important, but no one has gotten that far yet.

Pants 06-16-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6825196)
Ohhh look it's Metro policing the internets. If everyone is reeruned as you claim your life must be tragic. You sit around all day pointing this shit out go get a job or is the interviewer turned off by the pink shirt?

I'm at work, but that's a pretty funny post nonetheless. And not everyone is reeruned.

DeezNutz 06-16-2010 12:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6825186)
50's? I would have never guessed. You have the posting style of a witty, young, early-to-mid-20's, super-cool guy like me.

;)

I guess I might have one of those job things, too.

Titty Meat 06-16-2010 12:12 PM

Metro is Skip's only son.

teedubya 06-16-2010 12:13 PM

Just in case you are keeping score of who has been a douche in this thread... this may help you clear it up.

http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/9563/doucheacity.jpg

Titty Meat 06-16-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6825211)
Just in case you are keeping score of who has been a douche in this thread... this may help you clear it up.

http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/9563/doucheacity.jpg

I win I win! Or is the douche the one with a thousand twitter friends who likes to stalk me?

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6825186)
50's? I would have never guessed. You have the posting style of a witty, young, early-to-mid-20's, super-Awesome guy like DaKCMan AP.

.

teedubya 06-16-2010 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6825216)
I win I win! Or is the douche the one with a thousand twitter friends who likes to stalk me?

55k. :D And I just like to make idiots feel stupid. I trust it's working.

vailpass 06-16-2010 12:20 PM

When Perkins was giving that presser did any UT spunk leak out of his mouth or had he manged to swallow by then?

Pants 06-16-2010 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teedubya (Post 6825223)
55k. :D And I just like to make idiots feel stupid. I trust it's working.

LMAO

I'm pretty sure billay is desensitized to that feeling by now.

Pants 06-16-2010 12:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6825224)
When Perkins was giving that presser did any UT spunk leak out of his mouth or had he manged to swallow by then?

Seriously what's up with your fascination with sperm in male mouths? Jesus.

Reaper16 06-16-2010 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP (Post 6825219)
.

I thought about saying that but I didn't think Deez was self-referential enough.

teedubya 06-16-2010 12:27 PM

I'm pretty sure my avatar is one of the most hilarious ones in the history of ChiefsPlanet.

DaKCMan AP 06-16-2010 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6825241)
I thought about saying that but I didn't think Deez was self-referential enough.

It's the thought that counts.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.