![]() |
Quote:
I think the argument is definitely there for the Ravens still winning 10 or 11 games without Jackson last season or without his 3600 yards passing and 24 passing touchdowns. Hell, he probably has a better case this year given the defense sucks. I'm kind of torn on Burrow this season, just from their terribly weak wins... yeah, maybe they only win 5 or 6 games without him, but damnit he really elevated his team to beat all those 4-win teams and the Broncos and are still in the playoff hunt.... :shrug: |
What would the Eagles be without Saquon? Still a contender. They were in the sb two years ago.
My vote is Allen he’s had a great yr. What would the Bills be without Josh? An also ran watching the Dolphins win a tallest midget contest. I’d consider Burrow if their record was better and frankly might change my mind if they weasel into the playoffs - yes that’s partially out of his control but team success factors into it for me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
An example of getting MVP despite team performance would be the Stanley Cup finals last year. Although Florida won it, McDavid was MVP. They gave it to him as it was clear that he was heads and toes the best player in that series despite his team winning it all. Now Burrow has put up great numbers this year, but he’s not head and toes better than anyone else and because of that he won’t win. |
Quote:
Given the loss to the Texans, they'd potentially be 4th seed material. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'm sure I'll catch heat for it here, but I think Burrow has been more impressive than the other 2 in terms of playing QB from the pocket.
|
Now Fauker, you’re on a Chiefs forum Mr.
You be nice and show some respect! |
Quote:
Ravens... one of his best games of the season. Bucs Carolina, oddly And then I'm kind of torn on the Bengals game (given he had two turnovers), Chargers SNF, Texans. Maybe Black Friday. That's a tough one to figure out... he adds so much value ever week, yet struggled enough at times you had to wonder how he still managed to add enough value to win games (or luck into them). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Oh damn. I just remembered i have to go over to the RR to catch his reply. ROFL |
Quote:
Can't speak for the "team", but as a life-long Cincy fan, I can unequivocally state that the team I hate most in the league is, and always will be, the Pittsburgh Steelers. Point.Blank.Period. |
Quote:
If Blaine Gabbert came in for Mahomes and posted a better record and good stats, you know damn well you’d say it hurts his case for most valuable player. ROFL Especially if Mahomes were only beating scrubs. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
That would be an intentional tank job if I were to ever see one Lol! |
Baker vs Burrow - very similar line with a better record. Baker's case for MVP in my opinion is stronger than Burrow's and I''m not suggesting either one should get it. Burrow's best win was the Broncos game and only one that MIGHT make the playoffs. Baker has 3 wins against current playoff teams including the LIONS!
2024 Season Passing Completions 386 423 Attempts 538 606 Percentage 71.7 69.8 Yards 4,279 4,641 Yds/Att 8.0 7.7 TD 39 42 INT 15 8 Sacked 39 44 Rushing Attempts 51 41 Yards 310 202 Yds/Att 6.1 4.9 Long 21 47 |
Quote:
You can root for Wentz...we were rooting for the Bunglers on Saturday. Your team really tried it's best to live up to that name... |
Quote:
It's gotta be a mix of excellent play/stats while also elevating those around him to team success. Burrow's stats are crazy good, but team success nope. On the flip side, Mahomes' stats are not great, but him elevating play and resulting team success is off the charts (15-1). Mahomes isn't even in the MVP convo this year with a 15-1 team. Why? Burrow shouldn't be either, although he is killing it stats-wise |
Quote:
I've never really had hatred for teams that were just better than the Chiefs, so most of my life they just weren't good enough to have great rivalries. I'm not old enough for the true Chiefs/Raiders hatred of the 70s when players wanted to really, seriously, kill each other... and the Broncos just haven't been good at the same time as the Chiefs, outside of the mid-late 90s, which seems like a few lifetimes ago at this point. Those teams certainly aren't neutral, but I've spent far more time laughing at them than hating them.... or in say the Broncos' Manning years, shrugging that they were just better. I'd put the Bills at the top of the list of my teams to hate.... I'll always say, at least (for the most part) Bengals fans, the team, and apparently mayor earned bragging rights before they ended up taking it too far and paying dearly for it. Bills fans have been flapping their gums since before the 2020 AFCCG and have absolutely nothing to show for it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wouldn't have been a good game the other night without the Bungles showing up for some antics: 4th and 1 give up a prayer TD with 8sec left,, Cade York's doink hahahaha They're a dang roller coaster for sure |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Wowzers! But it's ok that Pat can't put up Burrow numbers anymore cause he just waits and wins the game. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I'm not even arguing he is the front-runner, just that if they make the playoffs, he has to be considered. 5 straight wins + those numbers + playoffs, carrying the team with an NFL record. Overall record is mid but he got really hot at the right time while Josh and Lamar have cooled off. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I know I’ll definitely be rooting for the Bengals to get in over the ****ing Donkeys so I understand the division rivalry thing for sure. It’s why all the betas hoping we lose this weekend to not give the Bungles a chance make me sick. You never turn down the opportunity to end your division rivals season. |
Quote:
Let the Steeler hate flow :# |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The defense isn't very good, but it wasn't the reason they lost 16-10 to NE. They also held KC to 19 offensive points and Joe's fumble-6 was the difference. If you want a realistic shot at MVP, don't piss down your leg in those games and win a shootout once in awhile. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's the way I hate Denver. Doesn't matter if they're good, bad or anything in between. **** 'em. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think it's just a bridge too far for Cincy. I don't see the Jets beating anybody, and our backups probably lose on Sunday. One might happen, but both? That's some long ****ing odds there.
|
Quote:
Maybe it's just gas. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And the NFL may have gifted the Bengals a game against the Steelers' backups, so you have that going for you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
2021 - Chiefs couldn't beat both the Bills and Bengals 2022 - Bengals couldn't beat both the Bills and Chiefs And last season, the Ravens obviously weren't prepared, but maybe they've learned a bit. And not so much "couldn't", but just the fact those games are 50/50 toss-ups, teams that see each other on average more than once per season. Mahomes' margin of victory is 11 when not playing Brady, Allen, or Burrow in the playoffs... and it's 2.8 when playing those guys (granted, I left out the Bucs SB as to not skew the small sample size, or else it's like 0.7). I'd say there's a pretty huge difference between playing a team like the Texans or Chargers in the Divisional Round and playing a big rival like the Bengals and of course a QB like Burrow. Of course, that would also mean the Bills are eliminated in the WC round, which would be both hilarious and helpful. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
The good news: Blaine Gabbert won in week 18 last year with the 3rd/4th string, and Wentz is better than Gabbert.
The bad news: Easton Stick won't be suiting up for Denver. |
Quote:
|
But, but, but Nix Bo
|
Quote:
I remember so clearly Watson playing air guitar after that 24 point 1st quarter. But Patrick had the lead before halftime. That’s whole playoff run was just ridiculous. Down double digits in every game and he didn’t blink an eye. |
Quote:
Looking at the schedule I think 4 wins is about right. |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="zxx" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/0t1pbZISO9">https://t.co/0t1pbZISO9</a> <a href="https://t.co/PPirOCRdgu">pic.twitter.com/PPirOCRdgu</a></p>— Chargers⚡️Union (@Chargers_Union) <a href="https://twitter.com/Chargers_Union/status/1875239622143594821?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Quote:
Because that just ain't gonna happen. There's no way Cleveland is going to be Baltimore with the division on the line. Cleveland is shot. |
Looks like there's a pretty decent chance we actually end up getting the Chargers in the Divisional Round.
Don't really love that. Would sure be nice if Pitt could beat Cincy in that game. And honestly, if we lose to Denver, seems like it's probably a safe bet. Losing to Denver makes a lot of sense for us if for no other reason than it gives Cincy literally nothing to play for in the nightcap and that vaults Pitt into the 4/5 matchup and we could probably beat whoever wins that game with the same roster we field vs. Denver. |
Cincy plays Saturday night. Chiefs play Sunday.
|
Quote:
|
That opener loss the NE was pathetic. Every game matters even the first one. Ask the Raven who still haven't locked up the division because they lost to us.
|
Burrow’s awful game vs the Patriots should disqualify him from the MVP conversation.
|
Yeah we want the Steelers to win so we likely play the Texans or Steelers. Out of the Texans, Steelers, Broncos and Chargers, I think it’s pretty easy to say the Chargers are the one team out of those 4 we would least like to play.
Good coach, great tackles, elite defense, really good QB. Definitely better than the other 3 IMO. Herbert may be 1-7 vs Mahomes but all but one of those games was decided by 7 or less points. Herbert is usually a pain in the ass. We’d win though |
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="zxx" dir="ltr"><a href="https://t.co/p3ybb6CF9W">https://t.co/p3ybb6CF9W</a> <a href="https://t.co/8rOVXypUxT">pic.twitter.com/8rOVXypUxT</a></p>— DMac Wake (@DMacWake316) <a href="https://twitter.com/DMacWake316/status/1875285593841922252?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 3, 2025</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
|
Wait, the Jets ALSO have to beat the Dolphins for the Bengals to get in? LMAO
|
|
Maybe you win a few more games at the beginning of the year than you do and you don't have this problem.
Did Burrow ever think of that? |
I’ll agree that out of the Chargers, Steelers, Broncos, and Texans — the Chargers are the least desirable matchup — however…
I think the Chiefs are kicking whoever’s ass they run into that weekend. Yes the Herbert-Mahomes matchups have always been close, and we’ve won 7 of 8, but the deck is going to be more stacked against LA this time around than normal. Playoffs are a different beast and Mahomes is statistically the best playoff QB ever. Arrowhead becomes the madhouse that it’s known to be. Guys are going to be fresh and fast coming off rest. The threepeat light is at the end of the tunnel. I’ll be the first to say on here that I love Harbaugh’s building blocks in LA and I think they just might be our biggest threat to winning more Super Bowls in the 2025-2030 window. But that roster isn’t ready for the big stage yet. |
The Chargers matchup is where I’d really love a healthy Humphries. They are one of the few defenses that can slow down our passing offense, so being able to pound the rock when the pass isn’t working could be huge - especially if we get poor weather and force those LA boys to play some smashmouth football in the cold.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And absolutely agreed about Humphries. The Thuney band aid at LT worked wonders, but having DJ out there would also give us an angle we didn't have against them earlier. |
Quote:
|
If Pitt oozes into the 3rd seed I'm going to be pissed.
That team is the biggest fake next to Denver in the playoff picture. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.