![]() |
Quote:
|
Gio won the George Brett award for best hitter in the orginization
|
Escobar is a turd.
WAR this year: Butler 0.5, Kotarras 0.5, Tejada 0.4. Lulz that says it all. |
Quote:
|
Hopefully Will Smith continues to start in AAA.
I don't think Duffy will be ready anytime soon. Dude avgs alot of pitches per inning so far and a high 5 era w/ walks. |
Not a fan of Chen starting cause we have 1-3 SP's but have almost 2 holes now in the rotation
|
Quote:
I don't think he's ready to pitch in the majors tomorrow... but post-ASB is a legit possibility, if his next 2-3 MiLB starts go well. Pitch count has recently gotten in the 80s/90s, so he's close to being where you want him from that regard. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ibanez went 2-5 with a HR tonight. 22 on the year.
Just thought I would place this here and walk away. |
Quote:
I'd love to be wrong, though. |
Come help our power problem Ibanez
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I still don't think this team can win the division with the current holes and would be smarter to see what they can get for Shields or Santana. I hope i'm wrong |
They'll try to keep Shields but will most likely deal Santana. He's going to demand too much, and he hasn't been as consistent as Shields -not this year but career wise I mean. Also what they do will depend on what Paulino and Duffy can do in the next couple weeks.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1) You're out of playoff contention for 2013 (more than a half-dozen games back) 2) You get back a legitimate top 50-75 prospect who is ready to help the big-league club in 2014. You're talking about guys like Adalbert Mondesi/Cheslor Cuthbert/Jorge Bonifacio (current) or Danny Duffy (past) at that point. If both of those things aren't present, I think you get more value out of him by keeping him, tendering him a qualifying offer, and picking up a supplemental pick in the 2014 draft (which is valuable for the draft pool dollars AND the potential to add a top 75 type guy to your squad). For example, if the Royals had owned a supplemental pick in this draft, they could have taken Austin Meadows at No. 8 instead of Dozier and comfortably signed him while still landing Manaea and maybe even Dozier. |
Quote:
|
Given that Garza appears to be the top pitcher on the market, Santana might bring a really nice haul.
This could be a perfect "buy low, sell high" opportunity. |
Quote:
|
Yeah, i wouldn't trade Santana just to get some b guys, it'd have to be the right deal. As for Garza, hes likely to go regardless of that extension talk...esp if he gets traded Santanas price would be huge.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And what is there to lose? A b prospect and a little over a mill? |
Quote:
|
KK and Danny rippin Rex and his dumb-assery
|
Quote:
If the Royals make a qualifying offer to a free agent who signs with another team. They get a compensation pick at the end of the first-round. The team that signed Santana would lose its first-round pick, unless it is in the top 10 of the draft (in which case it would lose its next-highest pick). The team that lost Santana would then receive a pick at the end of the first round. Example from this year: The Brewers had the 17th pick and signed Kyle Lohse, who was on a qualifying offer from the Cardinals. The Brewers lost their pick, with everyone behind them moving up one slot, and the Cardinals ended up with a compensation pick in the first round (No. 28). So, if KC had been in a similar boat and made a qualifying offer to another FA THIS year, they would have received an extra pick somewhere between 28 and 34. (All comp picks are taken BEFORE the start of the competitive balance round). That would have given KC: No. 8 (regular pick) No. 28-34 (comp pick for FA) No. 35 (competitive balance pick) No. 46 (second-round pick) With the extra $1.75 million the Royals got for the extra comp pick, they could have taken Meadows at No. 8 and paid him slot (because they no longer need to save at that pick to sign Manaea). They can take Manaea with either of the next two picks, and take a lesser college player they're certain of signing with the other. That's where the savings for signing Manaea could have been found. In next year's draft, the Royals likely will be picking somewhere in the teens with their first-round pick. If they make a qualifying offer to Santana and he signs with a different team, they'll get an extra pick at the end of the first round for him, with the signing team forfeiting their first-rounder. Then, they'll get a competitive balance pick. That extra $1.75 million from the extra first-round pick could come in really handy. That would give the flexibility to take someone with their REGULAR first-rounder who was falling due to price concerns. Or simply let them take another first-round type talent. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I have a friend who is a Giants fan, this makes me laugh so much.
http://blog.sfgate.com/giants/2013/0...cut-by-royals/ The Giants have reached that stage of this collapsing season where they are hoping to catch lightning in a bottle. The evidence is their signing of outfielder Jeff Francoeur to a minor-league contract. Francoeur, 29, was released by the Royals after hitting .208 with three homers and a paltry .571 OPS in 193 plate appearances. He is going to Fresno with the understanding that he will be called up to the big-league club sooner rather than later after he gets a few at-bats and does some work in left field, where he has played in two games as a major-leaguer. Francoeur was always a right fielder, with an excellent arm, but the Giants have Hunter Pence there. This is a standard no-risk Brian Sabean flier. The Royals will pay the all but a couple hundred thousand dollars left on Francoeur’s $7.5 million salary, and the team hopes the Braves’ 2002 first-round draft pick can find new vigor in San Francisco as Pat Burrell did in 2010 after he was cut loose by Tampa Bay amid talk that his hitting days were over. That worked out well for the Giants. Moreover, Francoeur can’t do any worse at the plate than Juan Perez or Cole Gillespie have during their looks. Francoeur has not been a good hitter since 2011, when he hit 20 homers and batted .285 with an .805 OPS for the Royals. Some of my followers on Twitter (@hankschulman) have asked why the Giants just don’t call up Gary Brown or Roger Kieschnick and see what they can do. Believe me, I’ve asked the question. Sabean believes that despite Kieschnick’s All-Star numbers in the Pacific Coast League, and Brown’s improvement over the past month, neither is ready to compete against big-league pitching. But that question is fluid. If the Giants conclude they have no chance this year — and that date might come a lot sooner than everyone expected — they might decide to look at Brown or Kieschnick with an eye toward 2014. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Zimmer went 6IP 4H 0BB 13K tonight
|
Quote:
|
Great to see Zimmer getting it together. I believe he has put together 3-4 nice starts now in a row.
|
Quote:
|
My apologies Mr. Butler. Great game and great series, so far. Keep it going.
|
Quote:
Lot of guys on the farm doing that, actually. Duffy, Ventura, Cuthbert, Bonifacio, Calixte included. |
Quote:
His attempts to develop a slider so far this year have not gone well. He still needs at least a "Show-me" changeup to reach his upside, but Shelby Miller's success in St. Louis this year shows a guy can pitch at a high level with a plus fastball and plus curve, and a rarely used/average change. |
Outfield Defense has been awesome since Francour died.
|
Quote:
|
Smiling...only this time it was his neck.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BP referenced it as "his worst pitch" according to many scouts, and cited overuse of that pitch as a potential reason for his struggles this year. |
CBS Sports talking about Santana's future with the Royals:
http://tinyurl.com/l9h73ad |
Quote:
Quote:
|
1 Attachment(s)
Rest in Peace
|
It will be awesome if Lough continues to develop
now if we can just find a 2nd baseman |
Let's assume, for a moment, the Royals make a September run at the playoffs. Do we call up Ventura or not?
|
We're in the toughest part of our schedule right now. After our homestand with Detroit and the Jim Johnson's, the schedule eases considerably.
3 at White Sox, 3 at Twins, 3 at Mets, and 3 at home vs. Twins. After 4 at home against Boston, it's the Marlins at home for 3. Later in August, we see the Twins and White Sox 3 more times each, at home. Oh yeah, and with that rainout we have a 5 game series at home against the Tigers. |
So to follow that, we're all in. We didn't just trade away the #1 prospect in all of baseball to dick around and be mediocre. My expectation, based on that move and the Royals' willingness to hold guys accountable, is that we're going to swing big at the deadline.
|
Quote:
If you need to stabilize the pen a bit, you bring him up and let him go Matt Moore/Trevor Rosenthal out of the pen. |
I think Ventura needs to perform better in AAA before we bring him up. If he goes beast mode after the break he might get a look to start in the bigs next year, but I'd be looking for him to be at best a June call up next year.
|
Quote:
|
Ventura won't be called up this year. If he does get called it will be late in the season for the pen
|
I've been watching wondering...specifically game 1 of the Yankees series. When we're in an 8th inning jam, runners on the corners up 3-1 with 2 outs...why don't we put in Holland for the 4 out save? Doesn't that just make sense?
|
If the Royals trade Santana it shows they've given up on the season.
|
Quote:
The Royals are starting to put some legit pieces in place, but '14 looks more and more like the year, not '13. All this said, I'd still be willing to push all of our chips in for Stanton. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Shields Duffy Guthrie Davis (Ick. Paulino is a possibility, but I'm not taking his return for granted.) Ventura |
Quote:
I think Ventura is going to be an ace in the future. |
I would love to see billy's numbers if he played the field. I think it gets real old for him just hitting.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No one ever asks Yost why Esky continues to bat in the #2 spot?
|
Nope, but at least we know that Davies actually pitched well tonight. That's a relief.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Good ol' Barnhead Ned. |
Santana is as good as gone next year...
I just don't see GMDM trading anyone off this roster unless it better this team this year. He's out to save his ass....the smart thing is that the Royals won't win this division and trade Santana for a ML hitter. I would trade the minors for Stanton |
This is where Deez and I fly off the rails in different directions. I don't know if there are pitching prospects... but most teams need to develop a pitcher or two on their own to compete. Unless you're gonna pull Dave Duncan out of the weeds and go win titles with guys like Suppan and Jeff Weaver. Of course the Royals have probably developed young pitchers worse than young hitters, which is saying something.
|
Quote:
Just because you want to keep Ventura doesn't mean that you have to create a false binary; advocating trading a "pitching prospect" isn't the same as advocating keeping Davies in the rotation. Santana is a one-year deal. Trade him. Or...trade the shit out of the farm to get viable pieces now. How much productivity have we seen from "the greatest farm system in baseball history?" Answer: not enormous amounts, which proves exactly what most prospects should be used for: trade chips. |
I would trade Santana and a prospect or 2 this year for a proven MLB hitter. I would still like to see Ventura called up this year to see what he's got. We are going to need to damn near revamp the rotation again next year.
|
Quote:
Hell, Greinke doesn't even provide evidence to the contrary because he was in the league at 20/21. |
Quote:
|
Looks like Jeter will be back for the Yankees tomorrow.
http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/ey...es-on-thursday |
This is a sad Giants' fan breaking down their signing of Frenchee, it's pretty glorious.
http://www.mccoveychronicles.com/201...ancoeur-giants |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.