ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

RustShack 06-15-2010 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6823423)
That's not the story they are spreading today.

Beebe disputes new TV deals for Big 12
Posted by John Taylor on June 15, 2010 1:52 PM ET
Perhaps the biggest news coming out commissioner Dan Beebe's press conference this afternoon -- other than the fact that Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri, Baylor and Iowa State are officially the rest of the Big 12's biznatches -- is the fact that there is no new television in place for the Big 12.

In the wake of Texas recommitting to the league Monday, multiple reports had a tweaked television deal paying Texas upwards of $25 million -- and other schools at least doubling what they've been receiving -- as the linchpin in keeping the Big 12 intact.

Beebe said earlier today that there is no new TV deal from either FOX or ESPN/ABC; rather, the conference was assured -- with those assurances being relayed to all ten schools -- by various "consultants that we are in a tremendous position to reach agreements to put us on par with anyone in the country." Additionally, there is no signed agreement that will keep the conference together. Instead, Beebe is taking them all at their word that they will remain true to the conference.

(About that Arizona oceanfront property, Mr. Beebe...)

Beebe also attempted to dispel the notion that UT held all of the cards in this situation.

"Texas has a lot of influence," he said. "But I think you have to also look at Texas A&M and Oklahoma. They were hotly pursued by a number of conferences. Their value, based on their marketplace, history, were desirable. Frankly, they could have left for a guaranteed situation.

"One of the misnomers is this all about money. They are committed to this conference for more reasons than that."

(Chuckle)

As for the five schools mentioned in the opening of this post? All five agreed to give up their share of penalties Colorado and Nebraska will have to pay, forking that money over instead to, mostly, Texas, Oklahoma and Texas A&M.

Oh yeah, we can see this newly-configured Big 12 having long-term viability. Yep.

AustinChief 06-15-2010 05:00 PM

Ok, so let me get the general bitching straight... 5 universities were about to be left homeless with no prospects and NO ONE was going to collect money from CU and NU for leaving...

instead, 5 universities (that had better offers) stayed in the conference in exchange for getting the penalty money from CU and NU and EVERYONE gets a higher cut of TV revenue...

Exactly HOW is that unfair?

Jesus, some of you guys have some serious university penis envy going on.

What were the other 5 schools suppossed to do? Stay and turn down better deals out of kindness?

kstater 06-15-2010 05:03 PM

Only the dumbasses are complaining about double the TV revenue.

DeezNutz 06-15-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater (Post 6823482)
Only the dumbasses are complaining about double the TV revenue.

This was going to happen no matter what, though, assuming the Big XII stayed together. Since CU and NU left, we'll all just take a bit larger cut.

It's not like Beebe did anything to "save the conference."

Much talk amounted to absolutely nothing. There was never a snowball's chance in hell of Texas leaving.

Mr. Laz 06-15-2010 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823476)
Ok, so let me get the general bitching straight... 5 universities were about to be left homeless with no prospects and NO ONE was going to collect money from CU and NU for leaving...

instead, 5 universities (that had better offers) stayed in the conference in exchange for getting the penalty money from CU and NU and EVERYONE gets a higher cut of TV revenue...

Exactly HOW is that unfair?

Jesus, some of you guys have some serious university penis envy going on.

What were the other 5 schools suppossed to do? Stay and turn down better deals out of kindness?

how Austin?

Spott 06-15-2010 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823476)
Ok, so let me get the general bitching straight... 5 universities were about to be left homeless with no prospects and NO ONE was going to collect money from CU and NU for leaving...

instead, 5 universities (that had better offers) stayed in the conference in exchange for getting the penalty money from CU and NU and EVERYONE gets a higher cut of TV revenue...

Exactly HOW is that unfair?

Jesus, some of you guys have some serious university penis envy going on.

What were the other 5 schools suppossed to do? Stay and turn down better deals out of kindness?

I think the only thing that I'm angry about it is not getting to play CU in football and both NU and CU in basketball every year.

Brock 06-15-2010 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823476)
Ok, so let me get the general bitching straight... 5 universities were about to be left homeless with no prospects and NO ONE was going to collect money from CU and NU for leaving...

instead, 5 universities (that had better offers) stayed in the conference in exchange for getting the penalty money from CU and NU and EVERYONE gets a higher cut of TV revenue...

Exactly HOW is that unfair?

Jesus, some of you guys have some serious university penis envy going on.

What were the other 5 schools suppossed to do? Stay and turn down better deals out of kindness?

The general bitching is about the Big 12 universe revolving around Texas. That's why Nebraska left.

Mr. Laz 06-15-2010 05:26 PM

Yea ... cuz finding out your university is a pathetic,worthless barnacle on the Texas football ship is something to be happy about.

Apparently the only reason why MU,KSU,KU,ISU have football programs is so that they can be potholes on the Texas highway and collect money to fund other sports.

You know how KU schedules Fort Hays State in basketball every year? They do it for an easy win and to give Fort Hays some added revenue. It's freaking athletic charity.

guess what ... KU/KSU/ISU = Fort Hays state in football

Hey!! Guess what MU? In a decision that EVERYONE said was all based on money and t.v. market etc. The Big 10 took a lesser t.v. market and less money by going with Nebraska over MU because you guys are pathetic on a national level.

Welcome to being a barnacle on the ass of the athletic world along with ISU/KU/KSU/Baylor.

grab some Texas cock and take a big swig ... get used to the taste.

alnorth 06-15-2010 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6823511)
The general bitching is about the Big 12 universe revolving around Texas. That's why Nebraska left.

So far, I've got: Texas earning a little more money. (we lose out on about half million or so if they were split evenly, compared to an athletic budget of $70M for kansas) Also, the big 12 football championship game is in Dallas forever, except... we are doing away with that game.

What else is the evil Texas empire doing to us?

Brock 06-15-2010 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alnorth (Post 6823526)
So far, I've got: Texas earning a little more money. (we lose out on about half million or so if they were split evenly, compared to an athletic budget of $70M for kansas) Also, the big 12 football championship game is in Dallas forever, except... we are doing away with that game.

What else is the evil Texas empire doing to us?

Watch what happens with the Big 12 BB tournament.

alnorth 06-15-2010 05:29 PM

oh, by the way, Basketball isn't split evenly. Each school basically gets what they can negotiate, and KU rakes in a ton on national TV games. We seem to accept that as fine, but want football revenue split evenly. Cant have it both ways, for KU it might be a wash at best if it was all split evenly. Only schools like KSU and ISU would benefit.

Mr. Laz 06-15-2010 05:35 PM

Mr. Beebe the people of Kansas city are thankful that Texas allowed us to keep the Big 12 together /Kevin Kietzman


dude is going to have to wipe that texas jizz off his chin

AustinChief 06-15-2010 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6823523)
Yea ... cuz finding out your university is a pathetic,worthless barnacle on the Texas football ship is something to be happy about.

Apparently the only reason why MU,KSU,KU,ISU have football programs is so that they can be potholes on the Texas highway and collect money to fund other sports.

You know how KU schedules Fort Hays State in basketball every year? They do it for an easy win and to give Fort Hays some added revenue. It's freaking athletic charity.

guess what ... KU/KSU/ISU = Fort Hays state in football

Hey!! Guess what MU? In a decision that EVERYONE said was all based on money and t.v. market etc. The Big 10 took a lesser t.v. market and less money by going with Nebraska over MU because you guys are pathetic on a national level.

Welcome to being a barnacle on the ass of the athletic world along with ISU/KU/KSU/Baylor.

grab some Texas cock and take a big swig ... get used to the taste.

For the record, I'm a Michigan fan.. but to answer your post...

Get better at football and academics and this fails to be an issue. Texas does have an unfair advantage in recruiting and funds but that didn't stop KState from having a great program during Snyder's first stint...

I seem to recall this same situation existing in the Big8 but the big bad guy was Nebraska... the same Nebraska that became a second class citizen in the Big 12 and now will be one in the Big 10.

DeezNutz 06-15-2010 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823559)
For the record, I'm a Michigan fan.. but to answer your post...

Get better at football and academics and this fails to be an issue. Texas does have an unfair advantage in recruiting and funds but that didn't stop KState from having a great program during Snyder's first stint...

I seem to recall this same situation existing in the Big8 but the big bad guy was Nebraska... the same Nebraska that became a second class citizen in the Big 12 and now will be one in the Big 10.

LMAO. LMAO.

Yeah, that played a role in Nebraska's invite. FTR, Nebraska isn't a turd, but this university ranks behind KU and MU.

alanm 06-15-2010 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack (Post 6823443)
Beebe disputes new TV deals for Big 12
Posted by John Taylor on June 15, 2010 1:52 PM ET
Perhaps the biggest news coming out commissioner Dan Beebe's press conference this afternoon -- other than the fact that Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri, Baylor and Iowa State are officially the rest of the Big 12's biznatches -- is the fact that there is no new television in place for the Big 12.

In the wake of Texas recommitting to the league Monday, multiple reports had a tweaked television deal paying Texas upwards of $25 million -- and other schools at least doubling what they've been receiving -- as the linchpin in keeping the Big 12 intact.

Beebe said earlier today that there is no new TV deal from either FOX or ESPN/ABC; rather, the conference was assured -- with those assurances being relayed to all ten schools -- by various "consultants that we are in a tremendous position to reach agreements to put us on par with anyone in the country." Additionally, there is no signed agreement that will keep the conference together. Instead, Beebe is taking them all at their word that they will remain true to the conference.

(About that Arizona oceanfront property, Mr. Beebe...)

Beebe also attempted to dispel the notion that UT held all of the cards in this situation.

"Texas has a lot of influence," he said. "But I think you have to also look at Texas A&M and Oklahoma. They were hotly pursued by a number of conferences. Their value, based on their marketplace, history, were desirable. Frankly, they could have left for a guaranteed situation.

"One of the misnomers is this all about money. They are committed to this conference for more reasons than that."

(Chuckle)

As for the five schools mentioned in the opening of this post? All five agreed to give up their share of penalties Colorado and Nebraska will have to pay, forking that money over instead to, mostly, Texas, Oklahoma and Texas A&M.

Oh yeah, we can see this newly-configured Big 12 having long-term viability. Yep.

So what their saying is that any penalty money that Nebraska and Colorado has to pay is going to be paid only to Texas, Oklahoma and aTm. What kind of fucked up deal is that? :spock:

AustinChief 06-15-2010 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6823565)
LMAO. LMAO.

Yeah, that played a role in Nebraska's invite. FTR, Nebraska isn't a turd, but this university ranks behind KU and MU.

oh no, I agree with you there... I was speaking in regards to Texas and Pac-10 schools... The Nebraska invite was obviously all about football.

Nebraska is a fine school but NOT elite in academics by any measure.

mikeyis4dcats. 06-15-2010 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 6823579)
So what their saying is that any penalty money that Nebraska and Colorado has to pay is going to be paid only to Texas, Oklahoma and aTm. What kind of fucked up deal is that? :spock:

this has only been disproven about 5 times in the last 3 pages.

Reaper16 06-15-2010 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823476)
Ok, so let me get the general bitching straight... 5 universities were about to be left homeless with no prospects and NO ONE was going to collect money from CU and NU for leaving...

instead, 5 universities (that had better offers) stayed in the conference in exchange for getting the penalty money from CU and NU and EVERYONE gets a higher cut of TV revenue...

Exactly HOW is that unfair?

Jesus, some of you guys have some serious university penis envy going on.

What were the other 5 schools suppossed to do? Stay and turn down better deals out of kindness?

Spoken like a true Texan.

AustinChief 06-15-2010 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 6823579)
So what their saying is that any penalty money that Nebraska and Colorado has to pay is going to be paid only to Texas, Oklahoma and aTm. What kind of fucked up deal is that? :spock:

It's a fair one... if those schools had left (as they intended) there would be NO penalty money paid to anyone. So, in a bid to get them to stay.. the 5 "homeless" schools agreed to give up that money... that they would never have seen anyway.

AustinChief 06-15-2010 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16 (Post 6823601)
Spoken like a true Texan.

I'm a Michigan fan from St. Joe... I am still failing to see any GROUNDS to bitch.

If anyone wants to bitch at a school.. bitch at NU for jumping ship and starting the whole firestorm in the first place.

AustinChief 06-15-2010 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 6823592)
this has only been disproven about 5 times in the last 3 pages.

Actually, I have yet to see any PROOF on any of this.. nor will we see any for days yet... but IF this is the case.. I fail to see how it's unfair.

RustShack 06-15-2010 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 6823592)
this has only been disproven about 5 times in the last 3 pages.

By who? Do they know more than Dan Beebe who said those three schools are the only ones getting it? You do know he said that after all the other sources said the schools are getting it right?

vailpass 06-15-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6823523)
Yea ... cuz finding out your university is a pathetic,worthless barnacle on the Texas football ship is something to be happy about.

Apparently the only reason why MU,KSU,KU,ISU have football programs is so that they can be potholes on the Texas highway and collect money to fund other sports.

You know how KU schedules Fort Hays State in basketball every year? They do it for an easy win and to give Fort Hays some added revenue. It's freaking athletic charity.

guess what ... KU/KSU/ISU = Fort Hays state in football

Hey!! Guess what MU? In a decision that EVERYONE said was all based on money and t.v. market etc. The Big 10 took a lesser t.v. market and less money by going with Nebraska over MU because you guys are pathetic on a national level.

Welcome to being a barnacle on the ass of the athletic world along with ISU/KU/KSU/Baylor.

grab some Texas cock and take a big swig ... get used to the taste.


ROFL

vailpass 06-15-2010 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6823528)
Watch what happens with the Big 12 BB tournament.

The what?

Sam Hall 06-15-2010 06:01 PM

I hope Nebraska goes to court over this exist penalty. Texas was no better in any of this.

alanm 06-15-2010 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 6822990)
and yet we still stand to make about as much as NU will in the Big 10, PLUS we don't have to have Mom sow new patches on our uniforms.

I read that Nebraska will make the same money in the 1st 2 yrs in the Big 10 as they would in the Big 12 and then full shares kick in. Also the Big 10 is picking up some of the penalty money for leaving early so the hit won't be as bad.

teedubya 06-15-2010 06:04 PM

6666!!! thread of the devil!

KChiefs1 06-15-2010 06:05 PM

http://www.columbiatribune.com/weblo...s-talk-big-12/

Quote:

Here are some of the highlights from Tuesday’s news conference at Mizzou Arena featuring Missouri Athletic Director Mike Alden, Chancellor Brady Deaton and UM System President Gary Forsee. We’ll have much more coverage in Wednesday’s Tribune:

● First things first, Deaton stated the Big Ten never extended an offer for Missouri to join its conference. MU officials explored the possibility and studied the numbers, Deaton said, but an offer never arrived. Later, Alden tried to trace the origin of the Big Ten speculation, which of course started when MU officials didn’t initially deny MU’s interest in changing conferences. Alden admitted as much and agreed it might have been the wrong approach.

“When this all started to bubble in December, I think our fans developed a thought that and an expectation that the Big Ten was a league that was going to invite Mizzou,” he said. ‘By us not coming out and reinforcing that message that we have not received an offer from the Big Ten or that we needed to only focus what we were doing in the Big 12, certainly I can understand how that fueled the desires and the angst of our fans. For those out there who thought about that, the reality is we did not receive an offer from the Big Ten Conference. When we heard about conference expansions, we did our due diligence and did all the things necessary to make sure we were moving forward … but at the end of the day the Big 12 Conference is where we’ve been and … where we continue to be.”

“The speculation out there needed to be talked about and needed to be directly refuted,” he added. “What happens with your fan base, and I understand this, they’re sitting around going, ‘Maybe, maybe.’ Then at the end it’s like, ‘Holy cow, what’s going on?’ That’s an unfortunate occurrence.”

● Alden’s and Deaton’s thoughts seemed to conflict with Commissioner Dan Beebe’s regarding the league revenue that will be withheld from Nebraska and Colorado … and, according to Beebe earlier in the day, conceded to Texas, Texas A&M and Oklahoma by the five schools who weren’t being pursued by other conferences: Baylor, Iowa State, Kansas, Kansas State and Missouri. All three MU officials seemed to be finessing non-answers to the question of whether the five schools agreed to concede those funds to the other three.

“Our understanding on that was … there were institutions in our league that had opportunities to go elsewhere," Alden said, "and doing that, mostly likely — you’d have to ask Dan about that — there were opportunities for them to perhaps generate more revenue share than they’re currently getting. So we wanted to make sure that wasn’t necessarily an issue for them. If there was a way we could assist, we were more than happy to be able to assist in that fashion with the league. But, again, in our projections it’s going to be a moot point. It’s not going to be necessary but we were willing to do that.” I’ll explore that topic more in Wednesday’s Tribune.

● There will be no changes to the revenue distribution model the Big 12 has been using for TV revenue, Alden said. “And that puts the onus on Mizzou to win more games,” Alden added. More important than winning games is scheduling attractive ones, and I can’t imagine a new conference schedule that will include Oklahoma and Texas every year will inspire Alden and Gary Pinkel to strengthen the nonconference slate. In fact, I’d be surprised if MU doesn’t go straight cupcake on the three noncon games. Arizona State better have a fat buyout in its two-year deal, especially if the nine-game Big 12 schedule goes into effect in 2011.

● Alden reiterated the point made earlier in the day at Texas and by Beebe that there is no new finalized television agreement, but the league has assured the remaining 10 schools that consultants project a new deal that will be more lucrative than the current agreements, with the potential to be the second-highest revenue generating league in the country, Deaton said.

● There will be no changes to the way the Big 12 bowls select their Big 12 participants, Alden said.

● Some of the North Division ADs met in Kansas City on Tuesday and they discussed conference scheduling issues, non-conference scheduling, exit fees and eliminating the North-South divisions. That's a distinction Alden is in favor of erasing. "The quicker we can get away from the North and South divisions, to say, 'We're the Big 12 Conference, it doesn't matter where we're at,' the better. I think this will help facilitate that. ... We choose to believe the league will be stronger."

● Alden does not expect the conference’s name to change. “Big 12. Big 12,” he said. “It’s a great brand and we’re going to keep moving with that.”
● I asked Alden that if the future of the Big 12 is so promising, does he believe Nebraska or Colorado will regret leaving? “I don’t know,” he said. “Those two institutions made decisions that they felt were in their best interest. To us, we think the Big 12 is clearly one of the strongest leagues in the country. They were valued members. Will they regret not being here? I don’t know. I have tremendous respect for Coach Osborne. Tremendous respect for him. … We think the Big 12 is as strong as there is in the country and we’re just proud to be a part of it.”

Frazod 06-15-2010 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6823523)
Yea ... cuz finding out your university is a pathetic,worthless barnacle on the Texas football ship is something to be happy about.

Apparently the only reason why MU,KSU,KU,ISU have football programs is so that they can be potholes on the Texas highway and collect money to fund other sports.

You know how KU schedules Fort Hays State in basketball every year? They do it for an easy win and to give Fort Hays some added revenue. It's freaking athletic charity.

guess what ... KU/KSU/ISU = Fort Hays state in football

Hey!! Guess what MU? In a decision that EVERYONE said was all based on money and t.v. market etc. The Big 10 took a lesser t.v. market and less money by going with Nebraska over MU because you guys are pathetic on a national level.

Welcome to being a barnacle on the ass of the athletic world along with ISU/KU/KSU/Baylor.

grab some Texas cock and take a big swig ... get used to the taste.

Well, at least they took our call, Mr. Greatest Basketball Team Evar! nlm

KChiefs1 06-15-2010 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823591)
oh no, I agree with you there... I was speaking in regards to Texas and Pac-10 schools... The Nebraska invite was obviously all about football.

Nebraska is a fine school but NOT elite in academics by any measure.

I don't understand what the Big Ten gets out of adding Nebraska. This is not like it was in the 90's when NU was a national title contender...hell NU is on the same level at MU in football right now.

Nebraska has their tradition going for them & that's it.

alanm 06-15-2010 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock (Post 6823528)
Watch what happens with the Big 12 BB tournament.

Some one will notice the contract was signed with invisible ink. So they'll just have to move it to Jerry world. :D

KChiefs1 06-15-2010 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz (Post 6823555)
Mr. Beebe the people of Kansas city are thankful that Texas allowed us to keep the Big 12 together /Kevin Kietzman

That was disgusting to listen to...I thought he was really going to go after him about Notre Dame but he eased off.

Why not go after Notre Dame now? The Big 12 would have the most powerful conference with both Texas & Notre Dame in it. Would just need to add BYU after that to complete a real Big 12.

mikeyis4dcats. 06-15-2010 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823609)
Actually, I have yet to see any PROOF on any of this.. nor will we see any for days yet... but IF this is the case.. I fail to see how it's unfair.

then look for my post about 3 pages back of the UT press conference. Powers explicitly says this rumor is not true, and that Texas is opposed to any unequal sharing of the penaly fees

alanm 06-15-2010 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823608)
I'm a Michigan fan from St. Joe... I am still failing to see any GROUNDS to bitch.

If anyone wants to bitch at a school.. bitch at NU for jumping ship and starting the whole firestorm in the first place.

If we want to discuss why Nebraska left confined to $$$ only as a reason look no farther than Texas unwilling to assign their media rights to the Big 12 as every other school was willing to do. :shake:

Frazod 06-15-2010 06:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6823651)
I don't understand what the Big Ten gets out of adding Nebraska. This is not like it was in the 90's when NU was a national title contender...hell NU is on the same level at MU in football right now.

Nebraska has their tradition going for them & that's it.

You get a better perspective on this when you don't live in Missouri anymore. Nebraska is a name people recognize and associate with football, even if they have no idea where the **** Nebraska is or will ever go there. Nebraska means football to people who don't know any better. Doesn't matter the they haven't been a contender for years. Nebraska = Football!

That's how they beat us - the ignorance of the general population. Stupid people have TVs and buy cars and McDonald's and viagra and shitty beer and will watch what they've been conditioned to watch.

mikeyis4dcats. 06-15-2010 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall (Post 6823634)
I hope Nebraska goes to court over this exist penalty. Texas was no better in any of this.

on what possible grounds? It is a legal contract with a termination clause very clear about the penalty.

alanm 06-15-2010 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6823651)
I don't understand what the Big Ten gets out of adding Nebraska. This is not like it was in the 90's when NU was a national title contender...hell NU is on the same level at MU in football right now.

Nebraska has their tradition going for them & that's it.

Nebraska has a national following. It isn't just about TV sets in Nebraska.

KChiefs1 06-15-2010 06:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6823669)
You get a better perspective on this when you don't live in Missouri anymore. Nebraska is a name people recognize and associate with football, even if they have no idea where the **** Nebraska is or will ever go there. Nebraska means football to people who don't know any better. Doesn't matter the they haven't been a contender for years. Nebraska = Football!

That's how they beat us - the ignorance of the general population. Stupid people have TVs and buy cars and McDonald's and viagra and shitty beer and will watch what they've been conditioned to watch.

I guess I need to get out more...when I think of Nebraska I think of shithole.

Frazod 06-15-2010 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6823686)
I guess I need to get out more...when I think of Nebraska I think of shithole.

Me too. That's because we've actually been there. LMAO

Titty Meat 06-15-2010 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6823686)
I guess I need to get out more...when I think of Nebraska I think of shithole.

And your profile says you live in Mid Missouri. Really theres no difference between middle Missouri and Nebraska.

Frazod 06-15-2010 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6823692)
And your profile says you live in Mid Missouri. Really theres no difference between middle Missouri and Nebraska.

I recently drove from extreme southeastern Nebraska to extreme northwestern Nebraska.

There's a giant ****ing difference.

alanm 06-15-2010 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 6823659)
That was disgusting to listen to...I thought he was really going to go after him about Notre Dame but he eased off.

Why not go after Notre Dame now? The Big 12 would have the most powerful conference with both Texas & Notre Dame in it. Would just need to add BYU after that to complete a real Big 12.

I've a feeling that the next 2 schools in the Big 10 will still be Missouri and Notre Dame. I just hope Alden didn't do something dumb to bind them for any kind of extended period.

Titty Meat 06-15-2010 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6823697)
I recently drove from extreme southeastern Nebraska to extreme northwestern Nebraska.

There's a giant ****ing difference.

Besides western Nebraska there is no difference between the rest of Nebraska and anywhere else in the midwest.

Sure-Oz 06-15-2010 06:30 PM

My buddy lived in Nebraska for a job, hated it....he eventually got a job back in denver. What is there fun to do in Nebraska besides go to a Husker game?

Titty Meat 06-15-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6823705)
My buddy lived in Nebraska for a job, hated it....he eventually got a job back in denver. What is there fun to do in Nebraska besides go to a Husker game?

If you don't live in Omaha or Lincoln probably nothing. I don't think it's much different here.

BWillie 06-15-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6823705)
My buddy lived in Nebraska for a job, hated it....he eventually got a job back in denver. What is there fun to do in Nebraska besides go to a Husker game?

To be honest w/ you, I think Omaha is a pretty similar metro area to KC.

Sure-Oz 06-15-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6823710)
If you don't live in Omaha or Lincoln probably nothing. I don't think it's much different here.

He lived in some town i've never heard of that he heard had rumors of vampires. ROFL He worked for a sports radio station.

Sure-Oz 06-15-2010 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BWillie007 (Post 6823714)
To be honest w/ you, I think Omaha is a pretty similar metro area to KC.

I'd probably go to some Omaha Royals games

Titty Meat 06-15-2010 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6823717)
He lived in some town i've never heard of that he heard had rumors of vampires. ROFL He worked for a sports radio station.

Vampires? ROFL

alanm 06-15-2010 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6823697)
I recently drove from extreme southeastern Nebraska to extreme northwestern Nebraska.

There's a giant ****ing difference.

You realize of course that I-80 was laid out on the Platte River Valley. Next time drive Hwy 2 across the state. Charles Kuralt had it listed as one of his favorite Hwy's. :thumb:

Sure-Oz 06-15-2010 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6823726)
Vampires? ROFL

Yeah, i'll have to ask him where he was living at...supposedly some local people said not to be out too late. ROFL

Frazod 06-15-2010 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6823703)
Besides western Nebraska there is no difference between the rest of Nebraska and anywhere else in the midwest.

Besides half the ****ing state, there's no difference at all! LMAO

Titty Meat 06-15-2010 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6823729)
Yeah, i'll have to ask him where he was living at...supposedly some local people said not to be out too late. ROFL

Now I want to check this out lol. Wonder if it was Blair Nebraska.

Frazod 06-15-2010 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz (Post 6823717)
He lived in some town i've never heard of that he heard had rumors of vampires. ROFL He worked for a sports radio station.

That's not vampires - it's just Nebraska, slowly sapping him of his will to live.

Sure-Oz 06-15-2010 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6823737)
Now I want to check this out lol. Wonder if it was Blair Nebraska.

I have no idea, i couldn't tell you cause it was probably 2 years ago he lived there. I just wonder if their the twilight pussy vampires or the ****ed up lost boys vampires

Sure-Oz 06-15-2010 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6823740)
That's not vampires - it's just Nebraska, slowly sapping him of his will to live.

LMAO

DeezNutz 06-15-2010 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823591)
oh no, I agree with you there... I was speaking in regards to Texas and Pac-10 schools... The Nebraska invite was obviously all about football.

Nebraska is a fine school but NOT elite in academics by any measure.

I hear you, man, and Texas is a great school. But even the Pac-10 expansion has nothing to do with academics.

If Texas went, the Pac-10 was going to take Texas Tech and OSU. Both are ****ing jokes.

Without Texas, the Pac-10 is likely going to take Utah. Again, a joke.

Titty Meat 06-15-2010 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6823762)
I hear you, man, and Texas is a great school. But even the Pac-10 expansion has nothing to do with academics.

If Texas went, the Pac-10 was going to take Texas Tech and OSU. Both are ****ing jokes.

Without Texas, the Pac-10 is likely going to take Utah. Again, a joke.

Utah a joke as in what? The football and basketball teams are solid.

Bearcat 06-15-2010 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6823669)
You get a better perspective on this when you don't live in Missouri anymore. Nebraska is a name people recognize and associate with football, even if they have no idea where the **** Nebraska is or will ever go there. Nebraska means football to people who don't know any better. Doesn't matter the they haven't been a contender for years. Nebraska = Football!

That's how they beat us - the ignorance of the general population. Stupid people have TVs and buy cars and McDonald's and viagra and shitty beer and will watch what they've been conditioned to watch.

Yeah, people are generally pretty oblivious, which is why a MLB player like Derek Jeter could miss the first half of the season and still be voted to the All Star game, or how apparently some guy in SC won an election because he was the first name on the ballot.... but that doesn't really have anything to do with Missouri and Nebraska, unless you think they should have only compared 2007 and 2008. Nebraska is a great fit for the Big 10, and details revenue that ranks in the top 20 of the country & those 3 NCs in the mid-90s & the BCS bowls in the last 10 years certainly doesn't hurt.

Pablo 06-15-2010 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6823765)
Utah a joke as in what? The football and basketball teams are solid.

Academics. He's talking about academic standards in relation to conference expansion; or lack thereof.

Titty Meat 06-15-2010 06:44 PM

http://collegeprowler.com/rankings/

ROFL Thats how they should rank the schools.

alanm 06-15-2010 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat (Post 6823767)
Yeah, people are generally pretty oblivious, which is why a MLB player like Derek Jeter could miss the first half of the season and still be voted to the All Star game, or how apparently some guy in SC won an election because he was the first name on the ballot.... but that doesn't really have anything to do with Missouri and Nebraska, unless you think they should have only compared 2007 and 2008. Nebraska is a great fit for the Big 10, and details revenue that ranks in the top 20 of the country & those 3 NCs in the mid-90s & the BCS bowls in the last 10 years certainly doesn't hurt.

According to Forbes magazine Nebraska is ranked 4th in revenue.

Bearcat 06-15-2010 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 6823772)
According to Forbes magazine Nebraska is ranked 4th in revenue.

Ah... I got it from a random link I probably found here, for 07-08.

http://www.sportsbusinessjournal.com/article/62825

HolyHandgernade 06-15-2010 06:49 PM

Quote:

Alden does not expect the conference’s name to change. “Big 12. Big 12,” he said. “It’s a great brand and we’re going to keep moving with that.”
I don't know, if you can get an OK from Marvel Comics, I kinda like:

The X Men Conference

You know, because X is the Roman numeral for 10.

Or, or, or The Big Square Root of 100 Conference....

OK, I'll shut up now. :doh!:

Buehler445 06-15-2010 06:49 PM

OK, so was there a resolution to this nonsense?

Titty Meat 06-15-2010 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alanm (Post 6823772)
According to Forbes magazine Nebraska is ranked 4th in revenue.

You think they move up this year?

old_geezer 06-15-2010 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolyHandgernade (Post 6823782)


I don't know, if you can get an OK from Marvel Comics, I kinda like:

The X Men Conference

You know, because X is the Roman numeral for 10.

Or, or, or The Big Square Root of 100 Conference....

OK, I'll shut up now. :doh!:

How about; Texas and the Seven Dwarfs ?

KChiefs1 06-15-2010 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6823740)
That's not vampires - it's just Nebraska, slowly sapping him of his will to live.

Reminds me of that Jack Nicholson movie About Schmidt.

KChiefs1 06-15-2010 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6823765)
Utah a joke as in what? The football and basketball teams are solid.

Utah easily moves into the top half of the Pac-12 in both sports.

WilliamTheIrish 06-15-2010 07:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief (Post 6823559)
For the record, I'm a Michigan fan.. but to answer your post...

Get better at football and academics and this fails to be an issue. Texas does have an unfair advantage in recruiting and funds but that didn't stop KState from having a great program during Snyder's first stint...

I seem to recall this same situation existing in the Big8 but the big bad guy was Nebraska... the same Nebraska that became a second class citizen in the Big 12 and now will be one in the Big 10.

And it hasn't stopped them from kicking UT's ass in every sport to this day.

WilliamTheIrish 06-15-2010 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hawkchief (Post 6819661)
I hope like hell this is right. Absolutely NO interest in being a pawn in Texas power play. I want KU to pick up their chips and rid itself of a disingenuous MU, a lame coat-tailing KSU and a conference where Texas holds all of the cards. On the the PAC 16 if possible - ASAP!

It's a shame you had no other options. You have the COMO ability to be wrong. You add the side dish of ignorance though.

DeezNutz 06-15-2010 07:58 PM

Is it possible to be a coat-tail to a coat-tail? At what point do you reach the floor?

I, on the other hand, am quite happy to be Texas's itchy jockstrap. Yep, we hold their balls, but at least they're never fully happy with us.

Frazod 06-15-2010 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6823952)
It's a shame you had no other options. You have the COMO ability to be wrong. You add the side dish of ignorance though.

Boy, you dug deep for that turd. He's not worth the trouble.

WilliamTheIrish 06-15-2010 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6823956)
Is it possible to be a coat-tail to a coat-tail? At what point do you reach the floor?

I, on the other hand, am quite happy to be Texas's itchy jockstrap. Yep, we hold their balls, but at least they're never fully happy with us.

I believe he'll be back. In three months. I hear there is an "We Had Options" banner ceremony. [Complete with two DVD set and they throw in some unused rehab equipment]

DeezNutz 06-15-2010 08:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6823968)
I believe he'll be back. In three months. I hear there is an "We Had Options" banner ceremony. [Complete with two DVD set and they throw in some unused rehab equipment]

I'm pissed that guys like us are even allowed to think about KU. Seriously, we're beneath them. My $5K is in the mail, just cause.

WilliamTheIrish 06-15-2010 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by frazod (Post 6823958)
Boy, you dug deep for that turd. He's not worth the trouble.

Wait for it.

Saulbadguy 06-15-2010 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish (Post 6823968)
I believe he'll be back. In three months. I hear there is an "We Had Options" banner ceremony. [Complete with two DVD set and they throw in some unused rehab equipment]

The "KU could have went to the Pac-10" phogtard talking point is picking up some steam, that's for sure.

Pablo 06-15-2010 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 6824079)
The "KU could have went to the Pac-10" phogtard talking point is picking up some steam, that's for sure.

u guyz juust mad cuz u no ur tracterz wood never half made it to cali.

WilliamTheIrish 06-15-2010 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy (Post 6824079)
The "KU could have went to the Pac-10" phogtard talking point is picking up some steam, that's for sure.

"They liked me. They really liked me".

DeezNutz 06-15-2010 08:47 PM

We would have gone if the KS legislature would have allowed it, so shut your worthless ****ing Wildcat mouths.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.